tim.conway@philips.com
2002-Jul-19 12:36 UTC
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
I think this is more a philosophical issue. Some people want all applications to be like windows. "Are you sure you want to delete this file" <YES> "really"<yes>"it might make something stop working<yes>"permission denied". Unix assumes you know what you're doing. If you don't, tough. There's no reason you can't make a "secure" rsync. You can use it, give it away, sell it, rename it - whatever you want, within the limits of the GPL. You can fork the project. Heck, maybe you can even bleed all the resources from this one into yours. I'd consider that a pretty good indication that your way is better. Then, everybody who needed to syncronize files preserving SUID attributes would have to keep a list of them all on the source, and add them back on on the destination in postprocessing, or else they could hack the source to preserve suid. Maybe they could petition your project to add a "--preserve-suid" option (instead of the more sensible "--strip-suid" option to add to this project. Tim Conway tim.conway@philips.com 303.682.4917 office, 3039210301 cell Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D Longmont, CO 80501 Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM perl -e 'print pack(nnnnnnnnnnnn, 19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970), ".\n" ' "There are some who call me.... Tim?"
Reasonably Related Threads
- strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
- strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
- suid files and bsd - correction
- non-interactive ssh connections (was Re: RSYNC ISSUE)
- No subject