search for: bleed

I think I found one of my setup problems. I followed instructions at: http://atrpms.net/install.html And now I see that the information shown there to put into yum.conf (that I put into yum.repo.d/atrpms.repo) is only for FC, not for RL5 (thus Centos 5). What do I use in my atrmps.repo to get it to access the RL5 directories?

Lookin for anyone who has experienced an issue similar to this. It's quite baffling as I'm unable to locate much help when it comes to debugging such an audio oddity. I'm currently running Asterisk 1.2.18 with a T1/E1 PRI. To cause the audio bleed (is audio bleed actually what I should even call this?): I create a meetme conference and have a few people call in to it. Once established I then use another phone and dial out a non-conference extension. As soon as Asterisk picks up the call for routing - the audio from the meetme application su...

...>> >> Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want >> to >> use the latest version of Zend. They are proposing using this package >> [2] >> but I never heard of this repo. For me it sound like an example of the difference between "bleeding edge" and "enterprise" systems. The first is what developers most often like, the second is what humble sysadmins prefer as they have to keep something developed long ago running for as long as possible - and without crashed, daemons dying etc (== "bleeding" which always...

...ing problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/opt/bleeding/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Mar 24 02:53:27 2009 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Configured Monitor" (**) | |-->Device...

...While all has been well since then, I am watching the KDE4 release schedule and noting that I don't think KDE4 is going to be done, ie polished and ready to use until late spring, 2009. I've also noted the Fedora is going to abandon support for F8 before Christmas. As F9 contains a very bleeding edge version of KDE4, I am loathe to upgrade to it. Thus I am shopping for a new OS to solve this problem and the problem of continually being a beta tester if one is an up to date Fedora user. With Fedora it seems that one just gets a new installation working nicely when support for it is d...

...g C++ mangled function. I know there''s an argument that this is useful to list the location of USDT probes through out the code, but that''s what the source is for :) This is particularly ugly in C++ due to the mangled names, but is equally problematic in C code as well, we are bleeding Unstable interfaces :( Some examples: $ dtrace -ln "moz*:::" ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME 128 mozilla3516 libxul.so __1cKnsDocShellLEndPageLoad6M...

...C5.5-updates/primary_db | 911 kB 00:01 addons | 951 B 00:00 atrpms | 2.6 kB 00:00 atrpms/primary_db | 1.3 MB 00:02 atrpms-bleeding | 2.9 kB 00:00 atrpms-bleeding/primary_db | 26 kB 00:00 atrpms-bleeding-debuginfo | 2.6 kB 00:00 atrpms-bleeding-debuginfo/primary_db | 6.6 kB 00:00 atrpms-bleeding-sour...

...ew unwanted entry in the AD hierarchy at the same level as "office.example.com", instead of using the existing AD entry that is under that node. Thanks for the link http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Maybe I'll give 18.04 or Debian 10 another try to see if it works now. Should I jump on the bleeding edge with Samba 4.11 and Bind9 (version?) (I don't see any mention of the bugzilla bug getting addressed.) What versions of these would you recommend? (fyi I am also planning to add dhcpd to this server to eventually phase out my old Windows Servers.)

...I've never used the (Intel) fakeraid. Why would I? > > If you don't require Centos, you could go for Fedora instead. Fedora has btrfs > as default file system now which has software raid built-in, and Fedora can have > advantages over Centos. > There are advantages in a bleeding edge one can find useful. There is some bleeding too, plausible, so don?t be surprised. Valeri > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I've tried to use Nouveau several times, with several operative systems (Ubuntu, Mint, Trisquel). Seemingly, the versions of Nouveau are too old, since my screen is detected as being smaller than it is. All in all, I tried to follow the instructions to build from scratch (in order to have the really latest version), and failed. Would somebody mind to create a script to download the sources,

R Community, I have a stupid little barplot I am trying to construct (Windows XP, R.11.1, 32-bit). Whenever I run it my bars run below the horizontal axis. Can anyone (1) reproduce this and (2) offer a solution? Rather simplistic code follows (I am new to the community)> Thanks for your help! Greg Gilbert =================== CUT HERE ===================

I have been following the patches on nvme support on the list and was wondering: If I wanted to build a vm host to be on the bleeding edge for nvme and spdk fun in libvirt, which linux distro -- fedora/ubuntu/centos/etc -- should I pick?

...LLVM's higher CMake > requirement is already the most demanding CMake version of all Zig's > dependencies. Making it any higher than it already is is strictly worse. > > Why is newer CMake needed? What is LLVM's build process doing that is so > complicated that it needs bleeding edge CMake? CMake wasn't really designed to accurately represent all of the things that LLVM does in its build process. Here is a list of a few things LLVM projects do in CMake that we've had to implement hacks to work around in the past: (1) LLVM builds a DSL compiler then uses that c...

...dates and so we expected to have high > reliability. I used to work for Tandem. I understand that kind of environment. > Those saying how easy it was to obtain the latest CMake have > apparently not been faced with the absolute need for solid > up-time. Installing hack-me-now, buggy, bleeding-edge software > was severely discouraged. But in the LLVM environment, I can see > where that is not a strong necessity. However I think you are creating a false dichotomy. I have no real insight into Ubuntu's methodology, but as a user, what I observe is that Ubuntu LTS is NOT a coll...

Hey guys, It has occurred to me that a lot of people need some of the fixes I make to Ferret ASAP and don''t like having to wait to long for the gem. On the other hand, it is a bit of a pain to download and install from subversion because then you need to uninstall when the next gem comes out. So I thought I may as well put some instructions out as to how you can build your own Ferret gem

...where, it often seems, everything in Centos > originates from. > > You will benefit from your own mailing list/web forum. Your attitude and > concerns are not unique. > > I stopped using Fedora because as soon as it was stable it was end of life and I was forced to install a new bleeding edge unstable version. I do not like bleeding edge for most things, I use mate in CentOS because GNOME 3 is not to my liking, for example, and makes me feel like I am fighting the desktop instead of using the desktop. I do not know if LibreSSL will ever be part of Fedora or CentOS because F...

...vg), 20.0ms (min) Page duration: 1000.0ms (max), 989.6ms (avg), 480.0ms (min) Total data length: 247227 bytes (overhead: 1.89%) Playback length: 0m:49.471s Average bitrate: 39.98 kb/s, w/o overhead: 39.22 kb/s Logical stream 1 ended Is this bleedover expected? I found an older copy of opus-tools (0.1.6, libopus 1.0.2) and it does not appear to have the bleedover between channels, so I think this was introduced in 1.0.3 or 1.1. Kevin O'Connor Interactive Intelligence, Inc.

Hello shorewall-users, now that I''ve got v1.4 problems solved I''d just like to ask a general question. Are there any real benefits to upgrading if v1.4 does what I want ? I''m not a fan of bleeding-edge in production and I don''t go for "v2 must be better than v1 because it''s newer" Tom, if you have a few minutes, what''s new in 2.0 that I don''t get in 1.4.1 thanks for all comments, Graham -- Graham K. Dodd Director of Operations Falk &am...

...t gc-24.de> wrote: > [...] > > If you don't require Centos, you could go for Fedora instead. Fedora has btrfs > > as default file system now which has software raid built-in, and Fedora can have > > advantages over Centos. > > > > There are advantages in a bleeding edge one can find useful. There is some bleeding too, plausible, so don?t be surprised. There is bleeding with Centos 7, too, and Centos 8 is probably no different. One can always be surprised. I'm not so much referring to bleeding but advantages like packages being available in Fedora tha...

...talled, there are fonts in the drive_c/windows/Fonts directory & the .reg file is pointing to one which is in there. Everything was working fine until I updated my graphics so the pretty Ubuntu effects would work properly, a summery of what i did is: This will enable repository which contains bleeding-edge mesa & Xorg drivers which are continually updated (via the xorg-edgers PPA), enable UXA acceleration, create a workaround for the MTRR bug and install kernel 2.6.30.3. This configuration is not necessarily the fastest (in fact, the Optimal configuration is fastest for my hardware), and...