Bill Michaelson
2008-Dec-03 14:45 UTC
[asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5
From: Doug <Doug at NaTel.net>>"Net Neutrality" is great in principle. But ISP's need to >somehow control those few percentage of users who suck down >a huge majority of the bandwidth. It's dollars and cents.There is a rational solution for the traffic management issue. It just needs to be aligned with the pricing model. I would like to see a tiered offering. If packet carriers would respect, say, DSCP tags, and ISPs would cap traffic (by bandwidth and/or aggregate transfer per period) in different ways based on priority tags, we could have a palatable solution for all. Let the bulk users camp out at the fixed price all-you-can-eat packet buffet all they want - at the bulk priority. If the chafing dishes are occasionally empty, well, too bad. Let them select one of the higher priorities for the metered or limited traffic. Then the ISPs could advertise unlimited offerings on a best effort basis, and caveat emptor. Applications that require more reliability (predictability) will not suffer. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3234 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081203/2493f6e3/attachment.bin
Seemingly Similar Threads
- asterisk-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 61
- Regression Modeling Strategies Workshop by Frank Harrell in Southern California
- Howto calculate R^2 from an anconva glm
- Oplock problem in 2.0.7 locks up Samba completely
- render :collection calling partial with phantom object?