search for: neutrality

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 943 matches for "neutrality".

2012 Aug 13
4
if else elseif for data frames
Hi all, It seems like I cannot use normal 'if' for data frames. What would be the best way to do the following. if data$col1='high' data$col2='H' else if data$col1='Neutral' data$col2='N' else if data$col='low' data$col2='L' else #chuch a warning? Note that col2 was not an existing column and was newly assigned for this
2009 Jul 23
11
Problem with named_scope
Here are my scopes: default_scope :order => ''posted_on DESC'', :conditions => { :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :positive, :conditions => { :rating => ''positive'', :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :neutral, :conditions => { :rating => ''neutral'', :status =>
2010 Aug 05
3
Plotting range of values in barplot()
Hello, I am attempting to create a bar plot that contains a range of possible response values on the x-axis of 1 to 5 and contains barplots for the number of responses even in the event that there are 0 responses. For example, I have a data set that contains values of 2, 3, 4, and 5 but I would also like my graph to show that there are no 1's. I have attached the resulting graph. The
2012 Jun 13
2
adjust space between horizontal legend text in a barplot
Hi All, I produced a barplot and made a horizontal legend below the graph. Because the results are from a survey, there are three levels, namely strongly disagree/disagree, neutral and strongly agree/agree. > rownames(survey)[1] "Strongly disagree/disagree" "Neutral" "Strongly agree/agree" As in the output above, there is a large space
2010 Dec 08
3
[POTS/BRI] Neutral comparisons of PCI vs. box?
Hello I need to find a recent and neutral comparison of the major products available to connect an Asterisk server to the telephone network, whether ISDN (BRI) or PSTN, and through a PCI card or some external box. I'm told there are less issues (echo, stability) with external boxes compared to PCI cards. Apparently, the main brands are Digium, Sangoma, Rhino Equipment, Patton, and
2008 Mar 06
0
Net Neutrality
What do we want "NET NEUTRALITY" When do we want it? "NOW AND FOREVER" This video should be compulsory viewing for everyone in public office not just here in the USA but globally so this public resource cant be stolen from you !! http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/net-neutrality.html <http://deanc...
2008 Dec 15
7
MS Visio 2003 - Wine 1.1.10 - Ubuntu 8.04
I would like to install (and work) with Visio 2003 using Ubuntu 8.04 and Wine 1.1.10. I have tried to install using setup.exe and the setup app started all looked ok then right at the end of the install it crashed with a "cannot find the wscript.exe" I tried to start Visio and as if i couldn't work this out Visio didn't start. I started to look at the forums to see if someone
2008 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] Architecture Dependency of LLVM bitcode (was Re: compile linux kernel)
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:03 -0400, Sherief N. Farouk wrote: > Why not add types with explicit endianess?... The issues with architecture dependency are far broader than byte order. LLVM in its current form is simply not intended to be machine neutral. Quite the contrary: it is heavily machine dependent!
2011 Mar 25
0
"Neutral" sources that attest to the success of the R project?
Hello everyone, The "R (programming language)" article in Wikipedia was nominated as a "Engineering and technology good article" but did *not* meet the good article criteria at the time (2010). The reviewer at the time made two interesting comments about the article: - Sources are almost all (except for one NYT article) online wiki-type sources. These may be
2008 Sep 29
3
[LLVMdev] Architecture Dependency of LLVM bitcode (was Re: compile linux kernel)
> hton and ntoh intrinsics. These are needed to allow target code to > deal with endianness in a target independent way. (Ok, you could > potentially write code that detected endiannes at runtime and chose > multiversioned code based on that, but that is ugly and optimization > prohibiting). > Why not add types with explicit endianess? A trick I use for reading binary files
2006 Aug 11
2
[PATCH][XEN] Use a union to pack the dual-short combos in an endian neutral way.
The first to members of a grant entry are updated as a combined pair. The following union patch uses a union so updated can happen in an endian neutral fashion. Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> diff -r 1f611b58729f xen/common/grant_table.c --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c Wed Aug 09 18:53:00 2006 -0400 +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c Fri Aug 11 12:29:48 2006 -0400 @@ -32,6
2005 Jul 06
1
dyn.load in linux: missing libraries?
Hi, I've just about got myself transferred from windowsXP to Linux (Mepis 3.3.1-1). I've got R 2.1.1, emacs, and ess running from the debian repositories. Of course, there is a hitch. I have a bit of C code in one of my personal functions. I have, apparently without problem, been able to compile it using R CMD SHLIB, but when I try to dyn.load it I get the following error: >
2007 Jul 24
1
Nested list depth limit?
I'm trying to convert the following text into an ordered list, but when it hits the fourth level nested list, the list items aren't converted into <li>'s. Is there a limit to how far you can nest a list? * COURT INFORMATION * Opinions &amp; Orders * Administrative Orders * Opinion Search * Supreme Court * Superior Court *
2013 Apr 25
1
problem with geom_point in ggplot using a different column
I want to draw boxplot where the geom_points are displayed based on "ERBB2.MUT" subset and they should be displayed in the right box (based both on the "ERBB2.2064" field and "ERBB2_Status"). However, given my command I currently only see "red" points corresponding to "MUT" subset in one straight line corresponding to only "ERBB2.2064"
2009 Apr 19
3
[LLVMdev] glibc 2.10 featuring new elf trick
Hello, Michael > IMO, fat binaries should go away and be replaced by LLVM bitcode, with > code generation performed by the OS at load time. This would have many > advantages: the compatibility with all current and future > architectures would be guaranteed, Unfortunately no, the IR obtained from languages like C, C++, etc is not target neutral. -- With best regards, Anton
2013 Jul 12
0
Wine release 1.6-rc5
The Wine development release 1.6-rc5 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Bug fixes only, we are in code freeze. The source is available from the following locations: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.6-rc5.tar.bz2 http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/wine/source/1.6/wine-1.6-rc5.tar.bz2 Binary packages for various distributions will be available
2010 Nov 07
1
creating a scale (factor) based on a continuous variable nested within levels of factor
Hello R-helpers I hope that my subject line is not detering anyone from helping me out:) I have been stuck of a few hours now, and I don't seem to pinpoint where the problem is. I have a data.frame which is structured as follow: str(hDatPretty) 'data.frame': 1665 obs. of ?8 variables: $ time ? ?: num ?0 1.02 2.05 3.07 4.09 ... $ hr ? ? ?: num ?62.4 63.6 64.6 65.5 66.2 ... $ emg ? ?
2012 Dec 21
2
how to recode an ordered factor
Dear R helpers, I'm trying to recode an ordered factor to reverse its scale, but I can't figure out how to make it. I am using the Recode function provided by the Car package. I've created an ordered variable: data$o.var1 <- ordered(data$var1, levels=c(1,2,3,4), labels =c("very satisfied", "fairly satisfied", "not very satisfied", "not at all
2012 Oct 02
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
Hal, Andrey, Alexey, >From the LLVM design viewpoint, there is a fundamental problem with both Hal's approach and the Intel approach: both are quite language-specific. OpenMP is a particular parallel language, with particular constructs (e.g., parallel regions) and semantics. LLVM is a language-neutral IR and infrastructure and OpenMP-specific concepts should not creep into it. I've
2010 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > >> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This > >> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type > in > >> LLVM? > > I think in its current