Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM processing on the cards, with multiple interfaces? The QuickNet Internet LineJack meets the description I believe, but it only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have more than one FXS? Thanks. __ Dana Olson Disclaimer: The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050120/59921033/attachment.htm
Sorry. I don't know what I'm smoking today. We need T1 interfaces... :P So let me rephrase the question: Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM processing on the cards, with multiple T1 interfaces? The QuickNet Internet LineJack seems to meet the description I believe, but it only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have multiple T1 ports? Thanks. __ Dana Olson HelpDesk Technician TELESPECTRUM, INC. 1-800-704-9111 -----Original Message----- From: Olson, Dana Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 12:54 PM To: Asterisk Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: VoIP-to-TDM processing on-card? Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM processing on the cards, with multiple interfaces? The QuickNet Internet LineJack meets the description I believe, but it only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have more than one FXS? Thanks. __ Dana Olson Disclaimer: The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050120/e8ed96ed/attachment.htm
First, TURN OFF HTML. On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 12:53 -0500, Olson, Dana wrote:> Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM > processing on the cards, with multiple interfaces?Hmm, haven't seen any cards with an ethernet and a TDM interface. You must mean a card that does the TDM and codec translation for the computer. Did you have a look at the asterisk supported hardware list? Wouldn't that seem like a very pertinent place to look?> The QuickNet Internet LineJack meets the description I believe, but it > only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have more than > one FXS?If you want people to obey your disclaimer, you need to read it and see how it applies to a known publicly archived mailing list. If your employer requires that disclaimer, change email addresses for use with the list or risk looking incredibly stupid every time you decide to participate on the list.> > ______________________________________________________________________ > Disclaimer: The information transmitted in this message is intended > only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance > upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended > recipient of this message is prohibited. If you receive this message > in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > system. > ______________________________________________________________________-- Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com>
Olson, Dana wrote:> Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM processing > on the cards, with multiple interfaces? > > > > The QuickNet Internet LineJack meets the description I believe, but it > only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have more than > one FXS?It's been a long time since I've seen someone post a question to the mailing list like this. I turnip could do more research than you did. Try http://www.asteriskpbx.org/index.php?menu=hardware Try http://www.digium.com/
I did look there. If you read my follow up, I screwed up the original question. What I want is a card with multiple T1 ports that do the processing on the card, and not on the system CPU. Is there a mailing list for Asterisk where people treat each other in a civil manner? __ Dana Olson -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:08 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP-to-TDM processing on-card? Olson, Dana wrote:> Are there any cards that work with * that do the VoIP-to-TDM processing > on the cards, with multiple interfaces? > > > > The QuickNet Internet LineJack meets the description I believe, but it > only has a single FXS or FXO. Are there any cards that have more than > one FXS?It's been a long time since I've seen someone post a question to the mailing list like this. I turnip could do more research than you did. Try http://www.asteriskpbx.org/index.php?menu=hardware Try http://www.digium.com/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Disclaimer: The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system.
Olson, Dana wrote:> I did look there. If you read my follow up, I screwed up the original question. What I want is a card with multiple T1 ports that do the processing on the card, and not on the system CPU. > > Is there a mailing list for Asterisk where people treat each other in a civil manner? > __ > Dana Olson<snip>>Check out the following link - proclaims to work with Asterisk http://www.sangoma.com/products/p_voice-data.htm -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
Steve, thanks for that post, very useful and constructive. Thanks ;-)> <snip> > > > Check out the following link - proclaims to work with Asterisk > > http://www.sangoma.com/products/p_voice-data.htm > > -- > > "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, > deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) > > "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty > decreases." (Thomas Jefferson) > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Actually, I do care, and I did search Google (albeit quickly) and I did look on the hardware list as well as the VoIP wiki. Maybe one of the cards listed there does what I need, but it wasn't listed like the QuickNet cards are. I thought perhaps the feature list on the site would be consistent, but apparently not. The fact that the hardware list on the Asterisk site does not include the Sangoma cards shows that it's not a complete list of supported hardware. I don't understand what was so bad about my question. I thought it was direct and to the point, but apparently I left a lot of guesswork? A few people managed to actually answer my question - how did they do it? I usually turn off HTML, and I apologize for that. I am writing from my work account, and Outlook seems to reset it, depending on what computer I sit at. I agree that it's annoying. I'm sorry about the disclaimer, it is automatically added to any email that goes outside of our Exchange server. I'll get a new email account to use, as suggested by Steven. I won't email from this account again after this. I agree that it's annoying, but I fail to see how this makes me "lazy." And to Timothy, who just wrote back to my original question, the reason I don't want the TE cards is that the processing is done on the system CPU and not on the card itself. I already have one of the TE cards though, and will make due if it comes to that. Anyhow, thanks to those who could see past the petty details, and sorry for pissing off those who can't. -- Dana ---Original Message--- I think of that person (no, not me) as akin to RMS. Very smart, rather annoying at times, and usually RIGHT. Steve fails to realize that most people don't care how readable their messages are, don't care to learn how to ask good questions, don't care about HTML posting, or anything else that used to make mailing lists and usenet work. They post and expect magical fairies to read their mind and send back an answer. Then they get upset when nobody wants to scroll thru 4 pages of footers and stuff that doesn't apply to their message. These people are lazy and should NOT be rewarded. Disclaimer: The information transmitted in this message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system.