Hi,
I wish to know if GNUGk can work with * running as a gateway with the Digium
FXO card.
Kindly share your experiences in case there are some issues which one must
know before going in for such a setup.
Also, I've been reading about the DialTone detection capability by the
hardware in different countries. What are the issues with it?
Thanks & Regards,
Deepak
----- Original Message -----
From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #2640 - 14 msgs
> Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Incoming SIP matching (James H. Thompson)
> 2. Re: Has Nufone gone belly-up (John Baker)
> 3. GSM phone to *? (Max Tulyev)
> 4. Re: Has Nufone gone belly-up (David Liu)
> 5. GSM modems (Steve Underwood)
> 6. Re: rc.local dont works (listas iPfone)
> 7. Need Europian vendor for Digium hardware. (Anton Tinchev)
> 8. Wildcard X100P usable in Germany? (Roger Schreiter)
> 9. RE: Need Europian vendor for Digium hardware. (Low, Adam)
> 10. RE: Asterisk Indications (Philipp von Klitzing)
> 11. He really doesn't care (Bill Michaelson)
> 12. RE: GSM modems (Florian Overkamp)
> 13. Re: GSM modems (Max Tulyev)
> 14. Re: Has Nufone gone belly-up (Vic Cross)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "James H. Thompson" <jht@lj.net>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Incoming SIP matching
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:52:19 -1000
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> I ran some tests and reviewed the source code.
> It appears that for incoming INVITE messages, Asterisk first checks for
> [name] entries that match the user portion of the SIP URI in the From:
header of the INVITE> message..
> i.e. if you are calling From sip:123@ab.com it looks for [123] in the
sip.conf file.> If this fails then it checks for an IP match.
> If the IP match fails then it looks in the extensions.conf file (in the
context set as default in> sip.conf) for a matching extension.
>
> If I've intereperted it correctly, it seems a strange way for it to
operate.>
> Adding some debug log messages about which sip.conf entry is being
selected would make figuring out> what is happening a lot easier.
>
>
> Jim
>
> James H. Thompson
> jht@lava.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas B. Clark" <digium@clark.durham.nc.us>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 3:01 AM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Incoming SIP matching
>
>
> > Incoming FWD calls from other FWD users, iaxtel, or via ipkall, need
to
> > have dtmfmode=rfc2833. However, incoming FWD calls from the dialup
> > access numbers (such as libretel) need to have dtmfmode=inband. To
> > solve this problem, I created a second FWD account and configured
> > sip.conf as follows, in order to match the incoming number to the
proper
> > dtmfmode:
> >
> > [fwd-rfc]
> > type=friend
> > secret=*****
> > host=dynamic
> > dtmfmode=rfc2833
> > username=76153
> > callerid="CLARK THOMAS B" <76153>
> >
> > [fwd-inband]
> > type=friend
> > secret=*****
> > host=dynamic
> > dtmfmode=inband
> > username=244006
> > callerid="CLARK THOMAS B" <244006>
> >
> > What I find is that, no matter what I change (for example,
host-dynamic
> > in order to prevent matching by IP address), I cannot make the
incoming
> > SIP calls match successfully. With the configuration above, all
incoming
> > calls use dtmfmode=rfc2833, but that could be because it's the
default.
> > Either entry works correctly alone (with the other commented out.)
> >
> > I found some discussion in the archives about incoming sip matching,
but
> > no patches.
> >
> > Is there a better way to handle the two types of incoming FWD calls?
If
> > not, is there something else I could change in order to make them
match
> > the correct section? Any ideas would be appreciated.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "John Baker" <johnb@listbrokers.com>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has Nufone gone belly-up
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:58:22 -0600
> Organization: List Brokers, Inc.
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Others on this list have shared their (positive) experiences with your
> company on this list. In fact the reason I attempted to contact you was
> because of this list.
>
> Are you saying that the Asterisk community should only hear one side of
the> nufone story? I differ. If there are good things to say about a
provider,> I want to hear them. Equally, if there are problems with a provider, I
want> to hear about them too. Therefore, no, I don't want to send a private
> email. I want others to judge for themselves whether or not nufone is the
> company for them. Thanks, but this thread remains public.
>
> Besides, you're digging your own grave here.
>
> What you (and alot of businesses) don't understand about complaints is
that> they generally don't come from people who don't want to do business
with
> you, but rather they come from people who do. They point out problems so
> that they CAN do business with you. That's why you need to listen and
> respond professionally, not defensively.
>
> For example, is it even slightly possible that you didn't return my
call?
> OK. We all make mistakes. Apologize and go on. My initial call meant
that> obviously at one point I was interested in doing business with you.
Instead> of insulting me, you could have inquired whether that interest was still
> there. How easy would it have been to have apologized and then opened up
a> dialog about the advantages that nufone has to offer over voicepulse? You
> would have:
>
> 1) Looked like a businessman instead of a grouch
>
> 2) Possibly brought me back over to your side
>
> 3) At the very least, gotten exposure for nufone to all the Asterisk users
> who are reading this thread (and are almost certainly potential nufone
> customers)
>
> I was looking for a response like that. Smart. Professional. I was
> looking for a response that said, "Hey, I was a bit upset, I'm
human. I'm
> sorry. Let's go forward."
>
> Instead, I'm chastised again, this time for not conversing with you via
> private email. Incredible.
>
> It's your turn. Whatever your response is, it's got to be more
professional> than this one. With your request for private email, you make it look like
> you want no one at Asterisk to hear about the negatives of dealing with
> nufone. I think we're past that. Read the threads that talk about
your
> company. We in the Asterisk community want to know who nufone is.
We're
> crying for info. Now's your chance.
>
> Tell us.
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy McNamara" <jj@nufone.net>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 12:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has Nufone gone belly-up
>
>
> > John Baker wrote:
> >
> > >You're right, Jeremy. I made up the whole thing. I went out
of my way
> to
> > >concoct a story about how I wanted to do business with you, but
was
> unable
> > >to figure out how on your website, so I called and left a message
and
> didn't
> > >get a return. Yeah, whatever.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > You could have simply decided not to add fire to this flame war and
> > mentioned the fact that we never called you back in a private email to
> > me directly. You would have met with a much friendlier response.
> >
> >
> > Jeremy McNamara
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@nline.ru>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:50:18 +0300
> Organization: Nline
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] GSM phone to *?
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi!
>
> I want to connect my old mobile phone (Nokia 5110) to * through soundcard
and> COM port, and use it as personal gate to GSM network.
>
>
> Is there a schema how to connect mic and tel from mobile's handsfree
connector> to line in and line out of soundcard? Can * do external program (gnokii)
to> dial a number? Or I have to write drivers?
>
>
> I'll write detailed howto if this works ;)
>
>
> --
> WBR,
> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "David Liu" <dtliu@scu.edu>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has Nufone gone belly-up
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:11:03 -0800
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi John,
>
> You are doing NuFone good by giving such indepth guidence on how to
operate> a business. Like the Chinese saying, you are putting money into
NuFone's
> pocket...they really should thank you for you making a point here on your
> complaints. For most of people, they just drop it and move on.
Eventually,> the businesses are gone. At least now NuFone can look back and do
something> about their service before it is too late. (i.e. customers are gone...)
>
> By the way, Happy Chinese New Year everybody!
>
> David
> -users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:19:11 +0800
> From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] GSM modems
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am interested in interfacing a GSM modem to *. I've seen a few
> comments about doing this, but I'm not clear whether people have
> actually made it work. I've used GSM modems for various data jobs,
> mostly high volume SMS (no, not nasty marketing stuff - high volume
> solicited SMS :-) ) . These only have analogue ports for voice. Does
> anyone know of units with digital voice interfaces?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "listas iPfone" <listas@ipfone.com.br>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] rc.local dont works
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:33:24 -0200
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Ok!
>
> Thanks
>
> miklos
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten Wemheuer" <kwem@gmx.de>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 9:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] rc.local dont works
>
>
> > Hi Miklos,
> >
> > listas iPfone wrote:
> > > Hi ! thanks for the answer..
> > >
> > > I use rh9...
> >
> > Sorry, I am familiar with Linux From Scratch, Debian and Gentoo but
not
> > with RH.
> >
> > >
> > > > I think with an interrupt problem, any startup will fail,
may it be
> > > > manual or automatic during startup.
> > >
> > > but.. you think that there is a problem in the interrupts at all?
i
> don?t
> > > understand.
> >
> > Sorry, that was a little bit irritating from me. English is not my
> > mother tongue. I mean, if it is an interrupt problem, there would be
no
> > difference in the results. So, I think it is NOT an interrupt problem.
> >
> > HTH & HAND
> > Karsten
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:52:03 +0100
> From: Anton Tinchev <atl@unixsol.org>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Need Europian vendor for Digium hardware.
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Must accepts wire transfers and ships to Sofia.
> Thanks
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:53:40 +0100
> From: Roger Schreiter <roger@planinternet.de>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcard X100P usable in Germany?
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi,
>
> can I use the X100P in Germany? (I assume I have to exchange some
> wires.)
> It would be operated inside a internal PTSN network, so my question
> is mainly technical, not about permission.
>
>
> Roger.
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Low, Adam" <ALow@Prioritytelecom.com>
> To: "'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com'"
<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Need Europian vendor for Digium hardware.
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:58:03 +0100
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=resellers#Europe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anton Tinchev [mailto:atl@unixsol.org]
> Sent: 26 January 2004 11:52
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Need Europian vendor for Digium hardware.
>
>
> Must accepts wire transfers and ships to Sofia.
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> ********* DISCLAIMER *********
>
> This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure and may include proprietary information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender
and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not
the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or
disclose the contents to any other person>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:12:20 +0100
> From: Philipp von Klitzing <klitzing@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Indications
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Organization: AEGEE
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi!
>
> > You'll find the Australian tone specs here
> > http://www.acif.org.au/ACIF/files/S002_2001.pdf
>
> The document below claims 425*25 for Australian dialtone.
>
>
http://www.teltone.com/prodmanuals/TLE%20Telephone%20Line%20Emulator,%20Rev%
20L.pdf>
> Cheers, Philipp
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 05:36:14 -0500
> From: Bill Michaelson <bill@cosi.com>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] He really doesn't care
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
>
> --------------090107040305070903040308
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I'm new to this all, and had never heard of NuFone until someone raised
> the question of whether they were in trouble. This was a net positive
> for NuFone because it made me a aware of their existence. The next
> question in my mind was about their service, which I had to evaluate
> based on second hand information provided by others' comments, which
> were varied.
>
> Then I got first hand info, and this sums it up well...
>
>
> Our network and services speak for themselves. If they don't like my
> attitude after they publicly flame us they can find another provider, I
> really don't care.
>
>
> Jeremy McNamara
>
>
>
>
> --------------090107040305070903040308
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
> <title></title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <pre wrap=""><!----></pre>
> I'm new to this all, and had never heard of NuFone until someone raised
the> question of whether they were in trouble. This was a net positive
for NuFone> because it made me a aware of their existence. The next question
in
my mind> was about their service, which I had to evaluate based on second hand
information> provided by others' comments, which were varied.<br>
> <br>
> Then I got first hand info, and this sums it up well...
> <pre wrap="">
>
> Our network and services speak for themselves. If they don't like my
> attitude after they publicly flame us they can find another provider, I
> really don't care.
>
>
> Jeremy McNamara
>
> </pre>
> <pre wrap=""><font face="Helvetica, Arial,
sans-serif"></font>
> </pre>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> --------------090107040305070903040308--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> From: "Florian Overkamp" <florian@obsimref.com>
> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] GSM modems
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:38:30 +0100
> Organization: ObSimRef BV
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> Hi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I am interested in interfacing a GSM modem to *. I've seen a few
> > comments about doing this, but I'm not clear whether people have
> > actually made it work. I've used GSM modems for various data jobs,
> > mostly high volume SMS (no, not nasty marketing stuff - high volume
> > solicited SMS :-) ) . These only have analogue ports for voice. Does
> > anyone know of units with digital voice interfaces?
>
> No idea about that, but there are devices that connect a GSM to an FXO/FXS
> port (I have a Siemens Homestation connected to my X100P at home ;-) or
even> PRI...
>
> Florian
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> From: Max Tulyev <maxtul@nline.ru>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] GSM modems
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:03:07 +0300
> Organization: Nline
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> =F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 26 =F1=CE=D7=C1=D2=D8 2004 13:38
Flo> rian Overkamp =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC:>
>
> > No idea about that, but there are devices that connect a GSM to an
FXO/FXS> > port (I have a Siemens Homestation connected to my X100P at home ;-)
or
> > even PRI...
>
>
> I do not want to spend $1k, I just want to make home gate ;)
>
>
> So only question is a simple electronic schema to make ability to connect
l> ow=20> resistance end to high resistance (mic to line in and vice version).
> Anything other seems to be working.
>
>
> =2D-=20
> WBR,
> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:09:32 +1000
> From: Vic Cross <vicc@veejoe.com.au>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has Nufone gone belly-up
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
>
> > Our network and services speak for themselves. If they don't
like my
> > attitude after they publicly flame us they can find another provider,
I
> > really don't care.
>
> And I don't care about your network, your services, or your
contributions
> to Asterisk. Your behaviour in this matter is like that of a toddler in a
> sandpit, throwing sand back at the other kids then screaming "they
started
> it".
>
> Grow up. Your prospective customers have.
>
> echo nufone.net >> killfile
>
> --
> Vic Cross
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> End of Asterisk-Users Digest
