http://dovecot.org/test/
Possibly fixes the mail-cache-transaction assert.
Passdb and userdb configuration changed. New format is:
passdb sql {
args = /etc/dovecot-sql.conf
}
passdb pam?{
}
userdb passwd {
}
The above would first try to authenticate from SQL database, if it
failed because user wasn't found, or password was wrong, it would then
try PAM. The same is done for userdbs.
I'll probably do some other configuration file changes still before
v1.0. I'm also thinking about having a separate config process which
can read the actual configuration from files or sql.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050308/fa9426b8/attachment-0001.bin>
Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/test/ > > Possibly fixes the mail-cache-transaction assert. >Show of hands: How many people are running the 1.0-test series in a production environment and how many users are you supporting? I'm trying to decide on 0.99.x or 1.0.x for the new server I am building. I've set the Reply-To to my own address; I'll post a summary based on the responses I get (to keep the noise down on the list). TIA John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748
Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/test/ > > Possibly fixes the mail-cache-transaction assert. > > Passdb and userdb configuration changed. New format is: > > passdb sql { > args = /etc/dovecot-sql.conf > } > passdb pam { > } > userdb passwd { > } > > The above would first try to authenticate from SQL database, if it > failed because user wasn't found, or password was wrong, it would then > try PAM. The same is done for userdbs. > > I'll probably do some other configuration file changes still before > v1.0. I'm also thinking about having a separate config process which can > read the actual configuration from files or sql.When do you suspect 1.0 will be out? Are the above fixes backported to 1.0-stable? // Tom