I feel tedious when I define a S4 class and the methods. For each
method, I have to call both setMethod and setGeneric (or both
setReplaceMethod and setGeneric). I would like a more compact grammar
so that I can reduce the key strokes. I'm wondering if there is a
better way available.
setClass(
Class='A',
representation=representation(
x='numeric'
)
)
setMethod(
f='initialize',
signature='A',
definition=function(.Object,x){
cat("~~~ A: initializator ~~~\n")
.Object<-callNextMethod(.Object,x=x)
return(.Object)
}
)
setGeneric('getx', function(object){
standardGeneric('getx')
}
)
setMethod('getx', 'A',
function(object){
return(object at x)
}
)
setGeneric('setx<-', function(.object,value){
standardGeneric('setx<-')
}
)
setReplaceMethod(f='setx', signature='A',
def=function(.object,value){
.object at x<-value
return(.object)
}
)
a=new(Class='A',x=10)
print(getx(a))
setx(a)<-5
print(getx(a))
mtmorgan at fhcrc.org
2009-Oct-27 04:56 UTC
[R] How to reduce key strokes when defining S4 classes?
Quoting Peng Yu <pengyu.ut at gmail.com>:> I feel tedious when I define a S4 class and the methods. For each > method, I have to call both setMethod and setGeneric (or both > setReplaceMethod and setGeneric). I would like a more compact grammar > so that I can reduce the key strokes. I'm wondering if there is a > better way available. > > setClass( > Class='A', > representation=representation( > x='numeric' > ) > ) > > setMethod( > f='initialize', > signature='A', > definition=function(.Object,x){ > cat("~~~ A: initializator ~~~\n") > .Object<-callNextMethod(.Object,x=x) > return(.Object) > } > ) > > setGeneric('getx', function(object){ > standardGeneric('getx') > } > ) > > setMethod('getx', 'A', > function(object){ > return(object at x) > } > )in some sense getx is redundant; x(obj) can only extract a value; more so with setx(obj) <- value and x(obj) <- value (illustrating partly that 'x' is a poor name for a slot).> > setGeneric('setx<-', function(.object,value){ > standardGeneric('setx<-') > } > ) > > setReplaceMethod(f='setx', signature='A', > def=function(.object,value){ > .object at x<-value > return(.object) > } > )one can create ad hoc getter / setter writers (e.g., in the Bioconductor GSEABase package), but in the long run I have found these to require more thought than the saved keystrokes are worth. You might be more clever / disciplined than I. It's tempting to write getters / setters as simple functions (setGeneric / setMethod is required because the defined 'generic' isn't really that generic, it's just an idiosyncratic accessor) but in the long run this also doesn't seem to work well. Martin> > a=new(Class='A',x=10) > print(getx(a)) > > setx(a)<-5 > print(getx(a)) > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >