Noah Silverman wrote:> Hello,
>
> I working on a model to predict probabilities.
>
> I don't really care about binary prediction accuracy.
>
> I do really care about the accuracy of my probability predictions.
>
> Frank was nice enough to point me to the val.prob function from the
> Design library. It looks very promising for my needs.
>
> I've put together some tests and run the val.prob analysis. It
produces
> some very informative graphs along with a bunch of performance measures.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not sure which measure, if any, is the
"best" one.
> I'm comparing hundreds of different models/parameter combinations/etc.
> So Ideally I'd like a single value or two as the "performance
measure"
> for each one. That way I can pick the "best" model from all my
> experiments.
>
> As mentioned above, I'm mainly interested in the accuracy of my
> probability predictions.
>
> Does anyone have an opinion about which measure I should look at??
> (I see Dxy, C, R2, D, U, Briar, Emax, Eavg, etc.)
>
> Thanks!!
>
> -N
It all depends on the goal, i.e., the relative value you place on
absolute accuracy vs. discrimination ability. The Brier score combines
both and other than interpretability has many advantages.
Frank
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine
Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University