similar to: Best performance measure?

Dear Sir or Madam? I am a doctor of urology,and I am engaged in developing a nomogram of bladder cancer. May I ask for your help on below issue? I set up a dataset which include 317 cases. I got the Binary Logistic Regression model by SPSS.And then I try to reconstruct the model ?lrm(RECU~Complication+T.Num+T.Grade+Year+TS)? by R-Project,and try to internal validate the model through

Hi, I'm developing an experiment with logistic regression. I've come across the lrm function in the Design library. While I understand and can use the basic functionality, there are a ton of options that go beyond my knowledge. I've carefully read the help page for lrm, but don't understand many of the arguments and optional return values. (penalty, penalty.matrix,

Hi, I am trying to construct a logistic regression model from my data (104 patients and 25 events). I build a full model consisting of five predictors with the use of penalization by rms package (lrm, pentrace etc) because of events per variable issue. Then, I tried to approximate the full model by step-down technique predicting L from all of the componet variables using ordinary least squares

Dear List: Below is the validation output of a fitted ordinal logistic model using the bootstrap in the rms package. My interpretation is that most of the corrected indices indicate little overfitting, however the slope seems to indicate that the model is too optimistic. Given that most of the corrected indices seem reasonable, would it be appropriate to use this model on future data if the

lrm does some binning to make the calculations faster. The exact calculation is obtained by running f <- lrm(...) rcorr.cens(predict(f), DA), which results in: C Index Dxy S.D. n missing 0.96814404 0.93628809 0.03808336 32.00000000 0.00000000 uncensored Relevant Pairs Concordant Uncertain 32.00000000

Dear All, I have just estimated this model: ----------------------------------------------------------- Logistic Regression Model lrm(formula = Y ~ X16, x = T, y = T) Model Likelihood Discrimination Rank Discrim. Ratio Test Indexes Indexes Obs 82 LR chi2 5.58 R2 0.088 C 0.607 0

Dear, When fitting the following model knots <- 5 lrm.NDWI <- lrm(m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI,knots) I obtain the following result: Logistic Regression Model lrm(formula = m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI, knots)) Frequencies of Responses 0 1 666 35 Obs Max Deriv Model L.R. d.f. P C Dxy Gamma Tau-a R2 Brier 701 5e-07 34.49

Hi, I am trying to run a simple logistic regression using lrm() to calculate a odds ratio. I found a confusing output when I use summary() on the fit object which gave some OR that is totally different from simply taking exp(coefficient), see below: > dat<-read.table("dat.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=NULL) > d<-datadist(dat) > options(datadist='d')

Hi List, I don't understand why 'lrm' doesn't recognize the '~.' formula. I'm pretty sure it was working before. Please see below: I'm using R2.3.0, WinXP, Design 2.0-12 thanks, ...Tao > dat <- data.frame(y=factor(rep(1:2,each=50)), x1=rnorm(100), x2=rnorm(100), x3=rnorm(100)) > lrm(y~., data=dat, x=T, y=T) Error in terms.formula(formula, specials =

Dear R-help, This is an example in the {Hmisc} manual under rcorr.cens function: > set.seed(1) > x <- round(rnorm(200)) > y <- rnorm(200) > round(rcorr.cens(x, y, outx=F),4) C Index Dxy S.D. n missing uncensored Relevant Pairs Concordant Uncertain 0.4831 -0.0338 0.0462 200.0000

Hi, I've come across a strange error when using the lrm.fit function and the subsequent predict function. The model is created very quickly and can be verified by printing it on the console. Everything looks good. (In fact, the performance measures are rather nice.) Then, I want to use the model to predict some values. I get the following error: "fit was not created by a Design

Dear all, I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have successfully fitted a logistic regression model using the "glm" function as shown below. library(rms) gusto <-

Dear list, I am running some linear regressions through lapply, >lapply(c('EMAX','EC50','KOUT','GAMMA'),function(x)confint(lm(get(x)~RR0,dataset2))) I got results like [[1]] 2.5 % 97.5 % (Intercept) 0.6595789212 0.8821691261 RR0 -0.0001801771 0.0001489083 [[2]] 2.5 % 97.5 % (Intercept) -63.83694930

Colleagues, I am fitting an Emax model using nls. The code is: START <- list(EMAX=INITEMAX, EFFECT=INITEFFECT, C50=INITC50) CONTROL <- list(maxiter=1000, warnOnly=T) #FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT * XVAR^GAMMA / (XVAR^GAMMA + C50^GAMMA)) ## alternate version of formula FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT / (1 + (C50/XVAR)^GAMMA)) FIT <-

Dear list, I'm currently trying to use the rms package to get predicted ordinal responses from a conditional ratio model. As you will see below, my model seems to fit well to the data, however, I'm having trouble getting predicted mean (or fitted) ordinal response values using the predict function. I have a feeling I'm missing something simple, however I haven't been able to

I've noticed that glm and lrm give extremely different results if you attempt to fit a saturated model to a dataset with zero cells. Consider, for instance the data from, Agresti's Death Penalty example [0]. The crosstab table is: , , PENALTY = NO VIC DEF BLACK WHITE BLACK 97 52 WHITE 9 132 , , PENALTY = YES VIC DEF BLACK WHITE BLACK 6 11

Hi I am having some problems running a covariate analysis with my colleage using R with the NonMem program we are using for a graduate school project. R and NonMem run fine without adding in the covariates, but the program is giving us a problem when the covariate analysis is added. We think the problem is with the R code to run the covariate data analysis. We have the control stream, R code

Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix server by doing the following but the configure script fails with "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- # gunzip samba-latest.tar.gz # tar -xvf samba-latest.tar # cd samba-4.2.0 # ./configure ... ... Checking for blksize_t : ok Checking for blkcnt_t

Greetings: I'm running R-1.9.1 on Fedora Core 2 Linux. I tested a proportional odds logistic regression with MASS's polr and Design's lrm. Parameter estimates between the 2 are consistent, but the standard errors are quite different, and the conclusions from the t and Wald tests are dramatically different. I cranked the "abstol" argument up quite a bit in the polr

Hello R Community, I'm continuing to work through logistic regression (thanks for all the help on score test) and have come up against a new opposition. I'm trying to compute Somers Dyx as some suggest this is the preferred method to Somers Dxy (Demaris, 1992). I have searchered the [R] archieves to no avail for a function or code to compute Dyx (not Dxy). The overview of Hmisc has