J S
2009-Mar-24 13:48 UTC
[R] Do we have to control for block in block designs if it is insignificant?
I am wondering if in a block experimental design (ex. triple square lattice), the block effect was not significant, is it all right not to include the block effect in an empirical model (even though the sampling was done from different blocks)? Or we are forced to control for the block effect in block designs anyway? Thanks, Julia _________________________________________________________________ Internet Explorer 8 – Now Available. Faster, safer, easier. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Liaw, Andy
2009-Mar-24 14:55 UTC
[R] Do we have to control for block in block designs if it is insignificant?
The short answer is "no" (meaning to leave the blocks in the model). As Frank Harrell said, you've spent your degrees of freedom. Go home and be happy. Best, Andy From: J S> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:49 AM > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] Do we have to control for block in block designs > if it is insignificant? > > > > > > I am wondering if in a block experimental design (ex. triple > square lattice), the block effect was not significant, is it > all right not to include the block effect in an empirical > model (even though the sampling was done from different > blocks)? Or we are forced to control for the block effect in > block designs anyway? > > Thanks, > Julia > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Internet Explorer 8 - Now Available. Faster, safer, easier. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachme...{{dropped:12}}
Reasonably Related Threads
- Tukey, planned contrasts or t-test without ANOVA? What is correct?
- [WISH / PATCH] possibility to split string literals across multiple lines
- Correlation matrix removing insignificant R values
- nproc parameter in efpFunctional
- update fit (removing insignificant variables)