search for: insignific

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "insignific".

Did you mean: signific
2011 Nov 01
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build > with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) > on my Linux quad core box. Whatever improvement can be achieved on this > seems pretty insignifant. Oh, it's significant. When I build the Cray compiler with only non-LLVM stuff changed,
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > >> A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build >> with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) >> on my Linux quad core box. Whatever improvement can be achieved on this >> seems pretty insignifant. > > Oh,
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >>> 1. It generates really slow build systems. >> >> In my Linux box, last time I checked (long time ago) the cmake build was >> a bit faster than the Makefiles. But this is a tricky terrain, because >> they are not identical, not on the features supported (and some have an >> impact on build-time) nor
2011 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> There are several major problems with CMake IMO: >> >> 1. It generates really slow build systems. > > In my Linux box, last time I checked (long time ago) the cmake build was > a bit faster than the Makefiles. But this is a tricky terrain, because >
2011 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: >> >>> A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build >>> with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) >>> on my Linux
2011 Nov 01
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: >> >>> A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build >>> with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) >>> on my Linux quad core box. Whatever
2011 Oct 28
19
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Hi all, As you might have inferred, I'm in the process of working on some changes to the way LLVM builds. I have outlined a rough proposal below, unless there are any major objections I will probably start committing stuff next week. This message may be verbose, if you want the executive summary, skip to 'What This Means For Jane "LLVM Developer" Doe' at the bottom.