zfs discuss - Feb 2010 - [OT] excess zfs-discuss mailman digests

Hi. As sometimes list-owner''s aren''t monitored...
I signed up for digests.
On the mailman page it hints at once daily service.
I''m getting maybe 12 per day, didn''t count them.
Non-overlapping, various messages counts in each.
This is unexpected given the above hint.
Once a day would be nice :)
Thanks.

PS: Is there any way to get a copy of the list since inception
for local client perusal, not via some online web interface?

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:04 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com>
wrote:
> PS: Is there any way to get a copy of the list since inception
> for local client perusal, not via some online web interface?
You can get monthly .gz archives in mbox format from
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/.

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> writes:
> PS: Is there any way to get a copy of the list since inception for
> local client perusal, not via some online web interface?
I prefer to read mailing lists using a newsreader and the NNTP interface
at Gmane.  a newsreader tends to be better at threading etc. than a mail
client which is fed an mbox...  see http://gmane.org/about.php for more
information.

-- 
Kjetil T. Homme
Redpill Linpro AS - Changing the game

Thanks for the archive pointer, I completely overlooked it.
Replacing the obfuscated ''at''s allows mutt to read them :)
Doing some other lint checks... these lines in the gzip archives
could be adjusted by the list maintainer if so desired:

# Could be missing '' at ohsu.edu''
2006-May.txt.gz:From hakansom  Tue May 30 16:21:25 2006

# Could be ''^>From '' escaped
2006-August.txt.gz:From talking with the web console (Lockhart) folks,
2007-April.txt.gz:From what I saw, ZFS retried to write to this sector
2007-November.txt.gz:From time to time means several times a year in e
2008-December.txt.gz:From reading the list you might be able to do som
2008-November.txt.gz:From a user who cares about software freedom''s st
2008-September.txt.gz:From the PDF''s it sounds like async replication
2009-April.txt.gz:From a sysdmin perspective Nicilas is probably right
2009-January.txt.gz:From the rest of the thread I guess the mounts are
2009-November.txt.gz:From your description, it sounds like you are loo
2010-February.txt.gz:From the horse''s mouth:
2010-January.txt.gz:From my perspective, Sun really need to create a z
2010-January.txt.gz:From the perspective of the business, the contract
2010-January.txt.gz:From the perspective of MY business, I would much

The attachment dir is not producing proper Last-Modified: http headers.
So people mirroring/archiving that may end up repeatedly fetching it.