Just got a bunch of change notification emails on my report of a zfs send/receive segfault. I can''t find this online anywhere though, so I can''t check a couple of things. Strange thing though is that although it just changed ownership and then state today in the system, the history records entered seem to show most of the actual changes were a year ago. And given the description of the problem (pointer-handling error in strong processing when a directory path didn''t end with a slash, if I read it correctly), there was an easy workaround all this time, too. Damn. Can anybody who can see the CR online figure out what release build the fix was / will be in? Speaking of what build I should upgrade to :-). -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b at dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
On 3/02/10 09:31 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:> Just got a bunch of change notification emails on my report of a zfs > send/receive segfault. I can''t find this online anywhere though, so I > can''t check a couple of things. > > Strange thing though is that although it just changed ownership and then > state today in the system, the history records entered seem to show most > of the actual changes were a year ago. And given the description of the > problem (pointer-handling error in strong processing when a directory path > didn''t end with a slash, if I read it correctly), there was an easy > workaround all this time, too. Damn. > > Can anybody who can see the CR online figure out what release build the > fix was / will be in? Speaking of what build I should upgrade to :-).closed as duplicate of 6696858 zfs receive of incremental replication stream can dereference NULL pointer and crash which was fixed in snv_122. James C. McPherson -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
On Tue, February 2, 2010 17:34, James C. McPherson wrote:> On 3/02/10 09:31 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >> >> Can anybody who can see the CR online figure out what release build the >> fix was / will be in? Speaking of what build I should upgrade to :-). > > closed as duplicate of > > > 6696858 zfs receive of incremental replication stream can dereference NULL > pointer and crash > > which was fixed in snv_122.Excellent! Since all the builds I''m currently considering are greater than that. This has been mucking up my backup procedure (making me do full backups instead of incrementals) for a year, meaning I haven''t done enough of them. -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b at dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info