Any news on this bug? We are trying to implement write acceleration, but can''t deploy to production with this issue still not fixed. If anyone has an estimate (e.g., would it be part of 10.02?) i would very much appreciate to know. Thanks, Moshe -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Moshe Vainer <mvainer at doyenz.com> wrote:> Any news on this bug? We are trying to implement write acceleration, but > can''t deploy to production with this issue still not fixed. If anyone has an > estimate (e.g., would it be part of 10.02?) i would very much appreciate to > know. > > Thanks, > Moshe > > >http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6574286 It says right there it was fixed in b125, which would mean it will be included in the next opensolaris release. -- --Tim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20091130/5201e7a0/attachment.html>
Pablo Méndez Hernández
2009-Nov-30 20:35 UTC
[zfs-discuss] CR# 6574286, remove slog device
Hi Moshe: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 20:30, Moshe Vainer <mvainer at doyenz.com> wrote:> Any news on this bug? We are trying to implement write acceleration, but can''t deploy to production with this issue still not fixed. If anyone has an estimate (e.g., would it be part of 10.02?) i would very much appreciate to know.According to: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6574286 the bug was fixed in snv_125, so it will be in 10.03. Cheers. -- Pablo M?ndez Hern?ndez
I am sorry, i think i confused the matters a bit. I meant the bug that prevents importing with slog device missing, 6733267. I am aware that one can remove a slog device, but if you lose your rpool and the device goes missing while you rebuild, you will lose your pool in its entirety. Not a situation to be tolerated in production. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Moshe, Just so we are clear on the Solaris release info: CR# 6574286 is fixed in the Solaris Nevada release, build 125, as described here: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6574286 This CR has not yet integrated into a Solaris 10 release. Thanks, Cindy On 11/30/09 13:30, Moshe Vainer wrote:> Any news on this bug? We are trying to implement write acceleration, but can''t deploy to production with this issue still not fixed. If anyone has an estimate (e.g., would it be part of 10.02?) i would very much appreciate to know. > > Thanks, > Moshe
Thanks Pablo. I think I confused the matters - i meant to respond to the issue in bug #6733267, and somehow landed on that one... -----Original Message----- From: Pablo M?ndez Hern?ndez [mailto:pablomh at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:35 PM To: Moshe Vainer Cc: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CR# 6574286, remove slog device Hi Moshe: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 20:30, Moshe Vainer <mvainer at doyenz.com> wrote:> Any news on this bug? We are trying to implement write acceleration, but can''t deploy to production with this issue still not fixed. If anyone has an estimate (e.g., would it be part of 10.02?) i would very much appreciate to know.According to: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6574286 the bug was fixed in snv_125, so it will be in 10.03. Cheers. -- Pablo M?ndez Hern?ndez
I was responding to this: "Now I have an exported file system that I cant import because of the log device but the disks are all there. Except the original log device which failed." Which actually means bug #6733267, not the one about slog removal. You can remove now (b125) but only if the pool doesn''t need importing. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Moshe Vainer wrote:> I am sorry, i think i confused the matters a bit. I meant the bug that prevents importing with slog device missing, 6733267. > I am aware that one can remove a slog device, but if you lose your rpool and the device goes missing while you rebuild, you will lose your pool in its entirety. Not a situation to be tolerated in production.Expect the fix for this issue this month. Thanks, George
George, thank you very much! This is great news. -----Original Message----- From: George.Wilson at Sun.COM [mailto:George.Wilson at Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 9:04 PM To: Moshe Vainer Cc: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CR# 6574286, remove slog device Moshe Vainer wrote:> I am sorry, i think i confused the matters a bit. I meant the bug that prevents importing with slog device missing, 6733267. > I am aware that one can remove a slog device, but if you lose your rpool and the device goes missing while you rebuild, you will lose your pool in its entirety. Not a situation to be tolerated in production.Expect the fix for this issue this month. Thanks, George
Hi George. Any news on this? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Did the fix for 6733267 make it to 134a (2010.05)? It isn''t marked fixed, and i couldn''t find it anywhere in the changelogs. Does that mean we''ll have to wait for 2010.11 (or whatever v+2 is named)? Thanks, Moshe -- This message posted from opensolaris.org