Albert Chin
2009-Sep-29 00:33 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Should usedbydataset be the same after zfs send/recv for a volume?
When transferring a volume between servers, is it expected that the usedbydataset property should be the same on both? If not, is it cause for concern? snv114# zfs list tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img 70.5G 939G 15.5G - snv114# zfs get usedbydataset tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img usedbydataset 15.5G - snv119# zfs list t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img 14.5G 2.42T 14.5G - snv119# zfs get usedbydataset t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img usedbydataset 14.5G - -- albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com)
Albert Chin
2009-Sep-29 00:41 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Should usedbydataset be the same after zfs send/recv for a volume?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 07:33:56PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:> When transferring a volume between servers, is it expected that the > usedbydataset property should be the same on both? If not, is it cause > for concern? > > snv114# zfs list tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img 70.5G 939G 15.5G - > snv114# zfs get usedbydataset tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img > NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE > tww/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img usedbydataset 15.5G - > > snv119# zfs list t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img 14.5G 2.42T 14.5G - > snv119# zfs get usedbydataset t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img > NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE > t/opt/vms/images/vios/near.img usedbydataset 14.5G -Don''t know if it matters but disks on both send/recv server are different, 300GB FCAL on the send, 750GB SATA on the recv. -- albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com)