fyleow
2009-Jul-29 02:25 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Failing device in a replicated configuration....on a non replicated pool??
I was greeted by this today. The Sun Message ID page says this should happen when there were errors in a replicated configuration. Clearly there''s only one drive here. If there are unrecoverable errors how can my applications not be affected since there''s no mirror or parity to recover from? # zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using ''zpool clear'' or replace the device with ''zpool replace''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: scrub completed after 0h3m with 0 errors on Wed Jul 29 18:52:20 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c9d0s0 ONLINE 6 0 2 errors: No known data errors -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Bob Friesenhahn
2009-Jul-29 02:43 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Failing device in a replicated configuration....on a non replicated pool??
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, fyleow wrote:> I was greeted by this today. The Sun Message ID page says this > should happen when there were errors in a replicated configuration. > Clearly there''s only one drive here. If there are unrecoverable > errors how can my applications not be affected since there''s no > mirror or parity to recover from?Metadata is stored redundantly so some metadata could become corrupted and recovered via the redundant copy. In recent zfs you can set copies=2 to store user data redundantly on one drive. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/