Hugh Saunders
2008-May-30 14:07 UTC
[zfs-discuss] [osol-help] >1TB ZFS thin provisioned partition prevents Opensolaris from booting.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Akhilesh Mritunjai <mritun+opensolaris at gmail.com> wrote:> I think it''s right. You''d have to move to a 64 bit kernel. Any reasons to stick to a 32 bit > kernel ?My reason would be lack of 64bit hardware :( Is this an iscsi specific limitation? or will any multi-TB pool have problems on 32bit hardware? If so whats the upper bound to pool size on 32bit? -- Hugh Saunders
Joe Little
2008-May-30 15:49 UTC
[zfs-discuss] [osol-help] >1TB ZFS thin provisioned partition prevents Opensolaris from booting.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Hugh Saunders <hugh at mjr.org> wrote:> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Akhilesh Mritunjai > <mritun+opensolaris at gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it''s right. You''d have to move to a 64 bit kernel. Any reasons to stick to a 32 bit >> kernel ? > > My reason would be lack of 64bit hardware :( > Is this an iscsi specific limitation? or will any multi-TB pool have > problems on 32bit hardware? > If so whats the upper bound to pool size on 32bit? >I''ve noticed its only a problem of per-LUN sizes on 32bit Solaris clients trying to import them into ZFS. You can build a ZFS volume of any* size as long as the underlying LUNs are less than 1.4TB each I believe. Or so I''ve seen by experimentation. * is because the total pool size and the the per-LUN size was simply something that worked for me, but in the end, I did go w/ 64-bit processors as the memory crunch that ZFS has makes 32bit unusable for any heavy use beyond .5TB of disk, again by observation.> -- > Hugh Saunders > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >