At home I have an old ultra-60 running attached to a scsi shoebox with 6x18GB disks. I created the zpool as raidZ with one hot spare. Recently, one of the non hot spare disks failed and now zpool commands hang. Also, I/O to the pool just hangs for periods of time. I''m using release 0807 with latest patches as of around January. Is this fixed in a later patch? What can I do to fix this? I don''t have another disk to replace the failed one with. Thanks. --Les This message posted from opensolaris.org
J. Les Bemont wrote:> At home I have an old ultra-60 running attached to a scsi shoebox with 6x18GB disks. I created the zpool as raidZ with one hot spare. Recently, one of the non hot spare disks failed and now zpool commands hang. Also, I/O to the pool just hangs for periods of time. I''m using release 0807 with latest patches as of around January. Is this fixed in a later patch? What can I do to fix this? I don''t have another disk to replace the failed one with. >It is patiently waiting. Try physically removing the bad disk, which will fail faster. More sophisticated fault management has been implemented in SXCE/OpenSolaris and should arrive in Solaris 10 update 6. -- richard
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Richard Elling <Richard.Elling at sun.com> wrote:> J. Les Bemont wrote: > > At home I have an old ultra-60 running attached to a scsi shoebox with > 6x18GB disks. I created the zpool as raidZ with one hot spare. Recently, > one of the non hot spare disks failed and now zpool commands hang. Also, > I/O to the pool just hangs for periods of time. I''m using release 0807 with > latest patches as of around January. Is this fixed in a later patch? What > can I do to fix this? I don''t have another disk to replace the failed one > with. > > > > It is patiently waiting. Try physically removing the bad disk, which > will fail faster. More sophisticated fault management has been > implemented in SXCE/OpenSolaris and should arrive in Solaris 10 > update 6. > -- richard > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >Is there a way to tell zfs to manually fail it vs. physically removing the drive? Having access to physically remove a disk isn''t always possible :) --Tim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20080528/0db0cf45/attachment.html>
Tim wrote:> > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Richard Elling > <Richard.Elling at sun.com <mailto:Richard.Elling at sun.com>> wrote: > > J. Les Bemont wrote: > > At home I have an old ultra-60 running attached to a scsi > shoebox with 6x18GB disks. I created the zpool as raidZ with one > hot spare. Recently, one of the non hot spare disks failed and > now zpool commands hang. Also, I/O to the pool just hangs for > periods of time. I''m using release 0807 with latest patches as of > around January. Is this fixed in a later patch? What can I do to > fix this? I don''t have another disk to replace the failed one with. > > > > It is patiently waiting. Try physically removing the bad disk, which > will fail faster. More sophisticated fault management has been > implemented in SXCE/OpenSolaris and should arrive in Solaris 10 > update 6. > -- richard > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org <mailto:zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > > > > Is there a way to tell zfs to manually fail it vs. physically removing > the drive? Having access to physically remove a disk isn''t always > possible :)zpool offline -- richard