I believe concerns like this should go to you?
Bev.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [zfs-discuss] zfs discussion forum bug
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrew <andrewee2@yahoo.com>
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I started three new threads recently,
"Feature proposal: differential pools"
"Feature proposal: trashcan via auto-snapshot with every txg commit"
"Flushing synchronous writes to mirrors"
Matthew Ahrens and Henk Langeveld both replied to my first thread by
sending their messages to both me and to zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org,
and Matt did likewise for my second thread. All of those reply messages
had "references" headers. All of messages made it to me personally,
and
to the zfs-discuss mailing list. But none of the replies ever made it to
the forum at
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=80&start=0
Jeff Bonwick replied to my third thread by sending to me and to
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, but the message did not have a
"references"
header. The message made it to me, to the mailing list, and to the forum
as well.
I post via the forum, not via the mailing list. The only pattern I can
see is that maybe the forum software doesn''t like replies from the
mailing list to threads originated via the forum.
I recall having seen this message omission bug before. To whom should I
report it?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
