Cathryn Mitchell Reid
2007-Jan-10 16:24 UTC
Resending with headers....Fwd: Re: [zfs-discuss] Proposal: zfs create
Derek, Sorry, I should have sent you one with the headers Thanks for the assistance. Cathryn --- Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com> wrote:> From Bill Sommerfeld Tue Aug 15 15:12:47 2006 > X-Apparently-To: catmit60@yahoo.com via > 206.190.38.92; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:12:55 -0700 > X-Originating-IP: [72.5.123.71] > Return-Path: <zfs-discuss-bounces@opensolaris.org> > Authentication-Results: mta291.mail.re4.yahoo.com > from=sun.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) > Received: from 72.5.123.71 (EHLO > mail.opensolaris.org) (72.5.123.71) > by mta291.mail.re4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 15 > Aug 2006 15:12:54 -0700 > Received: from oss-mail1.opensolaris.org (oss-mail1 > [72.5.123.71]) > by mail.opensolaris.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id > 4CA7B43E80; > Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:13:05 -0700 (PDT) > X-Original-To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Delivered-To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com > (brmea-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.98.31]) > by mail.opensolaris.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id > 7034043E7A > for <zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 > 15:13:02 -0700 (PDT) > Received: from eastmail1bur.East.Sun.COM > ([129.148.9.49]) > by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with > ESMTP id > k7FMCmpm009338 > for <zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 > 16:12:49 -0600 (MDT) > Received: from thunk.east.sun.com > (thunk.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.66]) > by eastmail1bur.East.Sun.COM > (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with > ESMTP id k7FMCmG6006142; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:12:48 > -0400 (EDT) > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by thunk.east.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with > ESMTP id k7FMCmtD025851; > Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:12:48 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Proposal: zfs create -o > From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com> > To: Eric Schrock <eric.schrock@sun.com> > In-Reply-To: <20060815194706.GA20982@eng.sun.com> > References: <20060811164633.GA24548@eng.sun.com> > <1155668270.24747.13.camel@thunk> > <20060815194706.GA20982@eng.sun.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:12:47 -0400 > Message-Id: <1155679967.24747.66.camel@thunk> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > X-BeenThere: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 > Precedence: list > List-Id: zfs-discuss.opensolaris.org > List-Unsubscribe: ><http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss>,> > ><mailto:zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org?subject=unsubscribe>> List-Archive: > <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss> > List-Post: <mailto:zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org> > List-Help: ><mailto:zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org?subject=help>> List-Subscribe: ><http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss>,> ><mailto:zfs-discuss-request@opensolaris.org?subject=subscribe>> Sender: zfs-discuss-bounces@opensolaris.org > Errors-To: zfs-discuss-bounces@opensolaris.org > Content-Length: 906 > > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:47 -0700, Eric Schrock > wrote: > > > The copy-on-write nature of ZFS makes this > extremely difficult, > > particularly w.r.t. to snapshots. That''s not to > say it can''t be solved, > > only that it won''t be solved in the near term > (i.e. within the next > > year). The timeframe for ZFS crypto support is > much shorter, and this > > requirement is entirely reasonable for an initial > implementation. > > So, maybe we''re doing these projects in the wrong > order, then -- my > experience with implementing systems using > cryptography is that unless > you design, implement, *and* test algorithm and key > agility from the > beginning, you will have to throw away a lot more > than you originally > expected to when you try to add it in later. > > - Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss>__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com