Phil Winterfield (winterfi)
2008-Aug-20 20:41 UTC
[Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
I have read through the wiki pages and other docs on what happens with
xen network startup (split driver model) and it seems clear enough, but
I am finding that the default configurations aren''t showing the xenbr0
and vif''s. According to what I have read, this should be done by
default when ''(network-script network-bridge)'' is excuted in
the xend
startup script. The ifconfig is shown below. Are there other steps
that are needed to get this default config to show up?
Thanks,
Phil
[root@localhost ios]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA
inet addr:192.168.102.94 Bcast:192.168.102.95
Mask:255.255.255.224
inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:92461 (90.2 KiB) TX bytes:56883 (55.5 KiB)
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB
inet addr:192.168.102.71 Bcast:192.168.102.95
Mask:255.255.255.224
inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:33 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:10710 (10.4 KiB) TX bytes:8079 (7.8 KiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:964 (964.0 b) TX bytes:964 (964.0 b)
peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA
inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:154616 (150.9 KiB) TX bytes:72105 (70.4 KiB)
Base address:0x2020 Memory:98820000-98840000
peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB
inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:302 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:95790 (93.5 KiB) TX bytes:48500 (47.3 KiB)
Base address:0x2000 Memory:98800000-98820000
[root@localhost ios]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
eth0 8000.00151746efca no peth0
eth1 8000.00151746efcb no peth1
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
The vifs will show up when you boot a domU. -Asim On 8/20/08, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote:> I have read through the wiki pages and other docs on what happens with > xen network startup (split driver model) and it seems clear enough, but > I am finding that the default configurations aren''t showing the xenbr0 > and vif''s. According to what I have read, this should be done by > default when ''(network-script network-bridge)'' is excuted in the xend > startup script. The ifconfig is shown below. Are there other steps > that are needed to get this default config to show up? > > > > Thanks, > > Phil > > > > [root@localhost ios]# ifconfig > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA > > inet addr:192.168.102.94 Bcast:192.168.102.95 > Mask:255.255.255.224 > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:92461 (90.2 KiB) TX bytes:56883 (55.5 KiB) > > > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB > > inet addr:192.168.102.71 Bcast:192.168.102.95 > Mask:255.255.255.224 > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:33 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:10710 (10.4 KiB) TX bytes:8079 (7.8 KiB) > > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:964 (964.0 b) TX bytes:964 (964.0 b) > > > > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:1358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > > RX bytes:154616 (150.9 KiB) TX bytes:72105 (70.4 KiB) > > Base address:0x2020 Memory:98820000-98840000 > > > > peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:302 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > > RX bytes:95790 (93.5 KiB) TX bytes:48500 (47.3 KiB) > > Base address:0x2000 Memory:98800000-98820000 > > > > [root@localhost ios]# brctl show > > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > > eth0 8000.00151746efca no peth0 > > eth1 8000.00151746efcb no peth1 > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Phil Winterfield (winterfi)
2008-Aug-20 21:24 UTC
RE: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
Does xenbr0 no longer get displayed? It doesn''t show up. Thanks> -----Original Message----- > From: Asim [mailto:linkasim@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:16 PM > To: Phil Winterfield (winterfi) > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs > > The vifs will show up when you boot a domU. > > -Asim > > On 8/20/08, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote: > > I have read through the wiki pages and other docs on what happenswith> > xen network startup (split driver model) and it seems clear enough,but> > I am finding that the default configurations aren''t showing thexenbr0> > and vif''s. According to what I have read, this should be done by > > default when ''(network-script network-bridge)'' is excuted in thexend> > startup script. The ifconfig is shown below. Are there other steps > > that are needed to get this default config to show up? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > [root@localhost ios]# ifconfig > > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA > > > > inet addr:192.168.102.94 Bcast:192.168.102.95 > > Mask:255.255.255.224 > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > > > RX bytes:92461 (90.2 KiB) TX bytes:56883 (55.5 KiB) > > > > > > > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB > > > > inet addr:192.168.102.71 Bcast:192.168.102.95 > > Mask:255.255.255.224 > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:33 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > > > RX bytes:10710 (10.4 KiB) TX bytes:8079 (7.8 KiB) > > > > > > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > > > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > > > > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > > > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > > > RX bytes:964 (964.0 b) TX bytes:964 (964.0 b) > > > > > > > > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:1358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > > > > RX bytes:154616 (150.9 KiB) TX bytes:72105 (70.4 KiB) > > > > Base address:0x2020 Memory:98820000-98840000 > > > > > > > > peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB > > > > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > > > RX packets:498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > > > TX packets:302 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > > > > RX bytes:95790 (93.5 KiB) TX bytes:48500 (47.3 KiB) > > > > Base address:0x2000 Memory:98800000-98820000 > > > > > > > > [root@localhost ios]# brctl show > > > > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > > > > eth0 8000.00151746efca no peth0 > > > > eth1 8000.00151746efcb no peth1 > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
As evident from your brctl command - your bridges are called eth0 and eth1 and they are being displayed. Did past versions of Xen call them as xenbr0 - I don''t know but the point is - it(xenbr0) is not relevant here. -Asim On 8/20/08, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote:> Does xenbr0 no longer get displayed? It doesn''t show up. > > Thanks > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Asim [mailto:linkasim@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:16 PM >> To: Phil Winterfield (winterfi) >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs >> >> The vifs will show up when you boot a domU. >> >> -Asim >> >> On 8/20/08, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote: >> > I have read through the wiki pages and other docs on what happens > with >> > xen network startup (split driver model) and it seems clear enough, > but >> > I am finding that the default configurations aren''t showing the > xenbr0 >> > and vif''s. According to what I have read, this should be done by >> > default when ''(network-script network-bridge)'' is excuted in the > xend >> > startup script. The ifconfig is shown below. Are there other steps >> > that are needed to get this default config to show up? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Phil >> > >> > >> > >> > [root@localhost ios]# ifconfig >> > >> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA >> > >> > inet addr:192.168.102.94 Bcast:192.168.102.95 >> > Mask:255.255.255.224 >> > >> > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link >> > >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> > >> > RX packets:715 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> > >> > TX packets:347 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> > >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> > >> > RX bytes:92461 (90.2 KiB) TX bytes:56883 (55.5 KiB) >> > >> > >> > >> > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB >> > >> > inet addr:192.168.102.71 Bcast:192.168.102.95 >> > Mask:255.255.255.224 >> > >> > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link >> > >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> > >> > RX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> > >> > TX packets:33 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> > >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> > >> > RX bytes:10710 (10.4 KiB) TX bytes:8079 (7.8 KiB) >> > >> > >> > >> > lo Link encap:Local Loopback >> > >> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 >> > >> > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host >> > >> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 >> > >> > RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> > >> > TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> > >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> > >> > RX bytes:964 (964.0 b) TX bytes:964 (964.0 b) >> > >> > >> > >> > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CA >> > >> > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efca/64 Scope:Link >> > >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> > >> > RX packets:1358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> > >> > TX packets:424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> > >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 >> > >> > RX bytes:154616 (150.9 KiB) TX bytes:72105 (70.4 KiB) >> > >> > Base address:0x2020 Memory:98820000-98840000 >> > >> > >> > >> > peth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:46:EF:CB >> > >> > inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fe46:efcb/64 Scope:Link >> > >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> > >> > RX packets:498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> > >> > TX packets:302 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> > >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 >> > >> > RX bytes:95790 (93.5 KiB) TX bytes:48500 (47.3 KiB) >> > >> > Base address:0x2000 Memory:98800000-98820000 >> > >> > >> > >> > [root@localhost ios]# brctl show >> > >> > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> > >> > eth0 8000.00151746efca no peth0 >> > >> > eth1 8000.00151746efcb no peth1 >> > >> > >> > >> > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Todd Deshane
2008-Aug-21 02:36 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote:> Does xenbr0 no longer get displayed? It doesn''t show up.As of Xen 3.2, the bridges are no longer xenbr* and instead are eth* Cheers, Todd -- Todd Deshane http://todddeshane.net check out our book: http://runningxen.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Artur Linhart - Linux communication
2008-Aug-27 15:46 UTC
RE: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
Hello, are there any other conditions what to define in xen 3.2.1 in the comparison with Xen 3.1.0? My problem is, the bridge is not working till I do not define the corresponding eth device and the IP addresses for it in /etc/network/interfaces. My DomUs are not accessible through the network till I did not define the corresponding eth device in the config file and till the Dom0''s eth is not accessible throught the IP protocol... In xen 3.1.0 it was much more better - I defined the network bridges independently on the vast if the Dom0 "knows" the IP network connected to the physical interfaces... Or do I some mystake and have there some misconfiguration? Re there any new schemes according to the bridges? Can I use the old-style bridging, where it is not necessary to define the corresponding eth device in Dom0 to get DomU working on the interface? Cheers, Archie -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Todd Deshane Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 4:36 AM To: Phil Winterfield (winterfi) Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Asim Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Phil Winterfield (winterfi) <winterfi@cisco.com> wrote:> Does xenbr0 no longer get displayed? It doesn''t show up.As of Xen 3.2, the bridges are no longer xenbr* and instead are eth* Cheers, Todd -- Todd Deshane http://todddeshane.net check out our book: http://runningxen.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com __________ Informace od NOD32 3373 (20080821) __________ Tato zprava byla proverena antivirovym systemem NOD32. http://www.nod32.cz _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Todd Deshane
2008-Aug-27 19:09 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
Hello, On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Artur Linhart - Linux communication <AL.LINUX@bcpraha.com> wrote:> Hello, > > are there any other conditions what to define in xen 3.2.1 in the > comparison with Xen 3.1.0? My problem is, the bridge is not working till I > do not define the corresponding eth device and the IP addresses for it in > /etc/network/interfaces. My DomUs are not accessible through the network > till I did not define the corresponding eth device in the config file and > till the Dom0''s eth is not accessible throught the IP protocol... >It sounds like you are using Ubuntu, the issue here is likely that you have network manager installed and it doesn''t define the network devices in /etc/network/interfaces.> In xen 3.1.0 it was much more better - I defined the network bridges > independently on the vast if the Dom0 "knows" the IP network connected to > the physical interfaces... >This is probably an issue of Xen on <your distro> not being network manager aware.> Or do I some mystake and have there some misconfiguration? Re there any new > schemes according to the bridges? Can I use the old-style bridging, where it > is not necessary to define the corresponding eth device in Dom0 to get DomU > working on the interface? >You can define your own bridges and that will work fine, but you have to make sure all your configurations are updated (i.e. guest configs and if you specify anything in the xend config, etc.) Hope that helps, Cheers, Todd -- Todd Deshane http://todddeshane.net check out our book: http://runningxen.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Artur Linhart - Linux communication
2008-Aug-28 08:00 UTC
RE: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
Hello,
Thank You for response ;-)
I work with Debian Etch.
My point is, why have I to define the IP address in Dom0 if I want to use
the bridge for the DomU? I do not want the Dom0 has also the IP address on
that interface, which receives the traffic for DomU - mainly from security
and configuration effort reasons.
I do not understand why if my bridge is cofigured properly:
wonderland:/# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
eth0 8000.001517708dbc no peth0
eth1 8000.001517708dbd no peth1
vif4.0
eth2 8000.000423e45f5a no peth2
eth4 8000.000c42072d75 no peth4
eth5 8000.000c42072d74 no peth5
eth6 8000.000c42072d77 no peth6
wonderland:/#
and on eth1 the vif4.0 exists on peth1, why there comes no traffic through?
In the DomU if I ping something, i just get always the "destination host
unreachable" error, the DomU also cannot be pinged from outside...
In iptables I have in forward chain following line
ACCEPT 0 -- anywhere anywhere PHYSDEV match
--physdev-in vif4.0
What looks to be also correct for me...
Also in ifconfig the part relevant for this case looks good I think...
So, where can be the problem? Why have I to define the IP addres in Dom0 to
get it working?
With regards, Archie
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Deshane [mailto:deshantm@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:09 PM
To: Artur Linhart - Linux communication
Cc: Phil Winterfield (winterfi); xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Asim
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Artur Linhart - Linux communication
<AL.LINUX@bcpraha.com> wrote:> Hello,
>
> are there any other conditions what to define in xen 3.2.1 in the
> comparison with Xen 3.1.0? My problem is, the bridge is not working till I
> do not define the corresponding eth device and the IP addresses for it in
> /etc/network/interfaces. My DomUs are not accessible through the network
> till I did not define the corresponding eth device in the config file and
> till the Dom0''s eth is not accessible throught the IP protocol...
>
It sounds like you are using Ubuntu, the issue here is likely that you have
network manager installed and it doesn''t define the network devices in
/etc/network/interfaces.
> In xen 3.1.0 it was much more better - I defined the network bridges
> independently on the vast if the Dom0 "knows" the IP network
connected to
> the physical interfaces...
>
This is probably an issue of Xen on <your distro> not being network
manager
aware.
> Or do I some mystake and have there some misconfiguration? Re there any
new> schemes according to the bridges? Can I use the old-style bridging, where
it> is not necessary to define the corresponding eth device in Dom0 to get
DomU> working on the interface?
>
You can define your own bridges and that will work fine, but you have
to make sure
all your configurations are updated (i.e. guest configs and if you
specify anything in
the xend config, etc.)
Hope that helps,
Cheers,
Todd
--
Todd Deshane
http://todddeshane.net
check out our book: http://runningxen.com
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway.
http://www.astaro.com
__________ Informace od NOD32 3394 (20080827) __________
Tato zprava byla proverena antivirovym systemem NOD32.
http://www.nod32.cz
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Todd Deshane
2008-Aug-28 13:47 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Artur Linhart - Linux communication <AL.LINUX@bcpraha.com> wrote:> Hello, > > Thank You for response ;-) > > I work with Debian Etch. >One question I still have, is the network-manager packages installed?> My point is, why have I to define the IP address in Dom0 if I want to use > the bridge for the DomU? I do not want the Dom0 has also the IP address on > that interface, which receives the traffic for DomU - mainly from security > and configuration effort reasons. >So you are asking for a bridge that doesn''t have an external address, and further, you want the domU to get an address through that bridge right? I don''t know if it is possible or not, but you could do a simple test to see add the following to your /etc/network/interfaces auto br0 bridge_ports eth0 bridge_fd 9 bridge_hello 2 bridge_maxage 12 bridge_stp offi eth0 can be replaced with any eth* that you want to use as your bridge port. Then configure a test domU to use bridge=br0 as its vif option. If the domU can get an address and get out, then you are successful, If it can''t then my best guess is that it probably won''t work (or there is another way that I don''t know about) Hope that helps, Cheers, Todd _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users