Hi: I''ve a Xen installation setup with LVM and I''m wondering wich one gives better performance: HVM domU or paravirtualized one? Thanks in advance! -- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." ---------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.saghul.net/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Saúl Ibarra wrote:> Hi: > > I''ve a Xen installation setup with LVM and I''m wondering wich one > gives better performance: HVM domU or paravirtualized one? > > Thanks in advance! >Paravirtualized (PV) will have better performance. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Saúl Ibarra wrote:> Hi: > > I''ve a Xen installation setup with LVM and I''m wondering wich one > gives better performance: HVM domU or paravirtualized one? >Obviously paravirtualized. But if you are required to run HVM, then you can install paravirtualized drivers on HVMs which would bring you to a near paravirtualized performance. --Sadique> Thanks in advance! > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users