Hi, I notices there are some trap.c related messages in xm dmesg when I run a paravirtualised domU. They look like this: N) Freed 96kB init memory. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000404 from 00000040:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000408 from 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000040c from 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000410 from 00000000:00000008 to ffffffff:ffffffff. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000414 from 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000401 from 10000000:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000040d from 00200000:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000411 from 00000000:00000011 to 00000000:00000000. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000415 from 10000000:00000e0f to 00000000:00000000. (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000008b from 000000b6:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. Should I worry about it? Is it normal? Thanks for any help! -- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." ---------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.saghul.net/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Help anyone? Thanks!! On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Saúl Ibarra <saghul@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > I notices there are some trap.c related messages in xm dmesg when I > run a paravirtualised domU. They look like this: > > N) Freed 96kB init memory. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000404 from > 00000040:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000408 from > 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000040c from > 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000410 from > 00000000:00000008 to ffffffff:ffffffff. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000414 from > 00000000:00000001 to ffffffff:ffffffff. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000401 from > 10000000:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000040d from > 00200000:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000411 from > 00000000:00000011 to 00000000:00000000. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000415 from > 10000000:00000e0f to 00000000:00000000. > (XEN) traps.c:1946:d1 Domain attempted WRMSR 0000008b from > 000000b6:00000000 to 00000000:00000000. > > > Should I worry about it? Is it normal? Thanks for any help! > > > > -- > Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.saghul.net/ >-- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." ---------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.saghul.net/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
The messages seem to be related to the MCE instructions, so the workaround is to add ''nomce'' to the extra section of the configuration file. -- Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes." ---------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.saghul.net/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users