Hi, I''m new to Xen and I''ve set up a few domUs using Debian (I suspect there may be a problem there, see at end). To begin with everything worked OK, I rebooted domUs without any problems, but twice now when I try when I try to restart or shutdown a domain, the xm command locks up. # xm list Error: Device 0 not connected Usage: xm list [options] [Domain, ...] List information about all/some domains. -l, --long Output all VM details in SXP --label Include security labels First time this happened was when I shutdown -r from inside a domU, the domU never restarted, I rebooted the dom0, everything came up OK. Then I created a new domU for testing and did an xm shutdown without ever logging in, it happened again. The domUs I did not shut down continue to work, and xentop continues to work, though it displays Found interface vif4.0 but domain 4 does not exist. Found interface vbd-4-2050 but domain 4 does not exist. Found interface vbd-4-2049 but domain 4 does not exist. vbd-4-2050 is VBD. vbd-4-2049 is VBD. vbd-3-2050 is VBD. vbd-3-2049 is VBD. vbd-2-2050 is VBD. vbd-2-2049 is VBD. vbd-1-2050 is VBD. vbd-1-2049 is VBD. where 4 references the domU I shut down. Since the domU I shut down had disappeared drom xentop, I tried starting it again with xm create. When I tried with more memory allotted in the cfg file (my original problem was that I wanted more than 128MB RAM) I got Error: The privileged domain did not balloon! (logs saying [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:133) Balloon: 131852 KiB free; 0 to scrub; need 262144; retries: 20. [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:06 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1373 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:06 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1373 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:10 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:10 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:15 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:15 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1372 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:19 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting dom0 target to 1373 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:19 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to 1373 MiB. [2008-02-01 16:56:21 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:202) Domain construction failed ) When I tried with the same amount RAM as previously, I got Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. (logs saying [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:933) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:143) Waiting for devices vif. [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:149) Waiting for 0. [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:464) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vif/6/0/hotplug-status. [2008-02-01 18:02:03 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1449) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=6 [2008-02-01 18:02:03 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1457) XendDomainInfo.destroyDomain(6) ) I had previously upgraded the dom0 from the original etch to lenny, which did not go so well because the tls library reappeared, and I got scared because I couldn''t find the xen kernels for lenny, so I''m still running the etch kernels. It is possible that the xen-tools come from lenny. Could this be the problem? If so should I try pushing forward to lenny (does Xen even work on default lenny without recompiling Xen from scratch?) or should I start over with a clean etch ? If that version mismatch isn''t it, then I''m at a loss how to debug further, perl debug isn''t my forte. Thanks for any help. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Feb 1, 2008 12:16 PM, Code Monkey <have.an.email@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > I''m new to Xen and I''ve set up a few domUs using Debian (I suspect > there may be a problem there, see at end). > > To begin with everything worked OK, I rebooted domUs without any > problems, but twice now when I try when I try to restart or shutdown a > domain, the xm command locks up. > > # xm list > Error: Device 0 not connected > Usage: xm list [options] [Domain, ...] > > List information about all/some domains. > -l, --long Output all VM details in SXP > --label Include security labels > > First time this happened was when I shutdown -r from inside a domU, > the domU never restarted, I rebooted the dom0, everything came up OK. > Then I created a new domU for testing and did an xm shutdown without > ever logging in, it happened again. > > The domUs I did not shut down continue to work, and xentop continues > to work, though it displays > > Found interface vif4.0 but domain 4 does not exist. > Found interface vbd-4-2050 but domain 4 does not exist. > Found interface vbd-4-2049 but domain 4 does not exist. > vbd-4-2050 is VBD. > vbd-4-2049 is VBD. > vbd-3-2050 is VBD. > vbd-3-2049 is VBD. > vbd-2-2050 is VBD. > vbd-2-2049 is VBD. > vbd-1-2050 is VBD. > vbd-1-2049 is VBD. > > where 4 references the domU I shut down. > > Since the domU I shut down had disappeared drom xentop, I tried > starting it again with xm create. When I tried with more memory > allotted in the cfg file (my original problem was that I wanted more > than 128MB RAM) I got > > Error: The privileged domain did not balloon! > > (logs saying > > [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:133) Balloon: 131852 > KiB free; 0 to scrub; need 262144; retries: 20. > [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:00 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:06 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1373 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:06 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1373 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:10 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:10 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:15 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:15 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1372 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:19 xend 2254] DEBUG (balloon:148) Balloon: setting > dom0 target to 1373 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:19 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1014) Setting memory target of domain Domain-0 (0) to > 1373 MiB. > [2008-02-01 16:56:21 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] ERROR > (XendDomainInfo:202) Domain construction failed > ) > > When I tried with the same amount RAM as previously, I got > > Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. > > (logs saying > [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:933) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch > [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:143) Waiting for > devices vif. > [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:149) Waiting for 0. > [2008-02-01 18:00:23 xend 2254] DEBUG (DevController:464) > hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vif/6/0/hotplug-status. > [2008-02-01 18:02:03 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1449) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=6 > [2008-02-01 18:02:03 xend.XendDomainInfo 2254] DEBUG > (XendDomainInfo:1457) XendDomainInfo.destroyDomain(6) > ) > > > I had previously upgraded the dom0 from the original etch to lenny, > which did not go so well because the tls library reappeared, and I got > scared because I couldn''t find the xen kernels for lenny, so I''m still > running the etch kernels. It is possible that the xen-tools come from > lenny. Could this be the problem? If so should I try pushing forward > to lenny (does Xen even work on default lenny without recompiling Xen > from scratch?) or should I start over with a clean etch ? If that > version mismatch isn''t it, then I''m at a loss how to debug further, > perl debug isn''t my forte. >There does need to be a (close) match between the xen tools (not the xen-tools package), but xm, xend, etc. (i think this is in the xen-utils package typically...) need to be compatible to the dom0 and xen hypervisor version. I am not sure how close the match has to be, but it used to be the case that they had to be the same. I am not sure which setup to recommend. It depends on what you are trying to do. If you don''t need newer kernel support going with the etch packages should be fine. If you need newer kernel support then do an upgrade carefully and keep better track of what you have installed etc. Best of luck, Todd> > Thanks for any help. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Feb 2, 2008 4:13 AM, Todd Deshane <deshantm@gmail.com> wrote:> If you don''t need newer kernel support going with the etch packages > should be fine. If you need newer kernel support then do an upgrade > carefully and keep better track of what you have installed etc.Can I run xen on lenny with the default packages ? Etch has kernels named xen and xen-vserver, lenny has only vserver, and when I tried to find info about that I only found people having problems with lenny. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Feb 2, 2008 10:15 AM, Code Monkey <have.an.email@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 2, 2008 4:13 AM, Todd Deshane <deshantm@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you don''t need newer kernel support going with the etch packages > > should be fine. If you need newer kernel support then do an upgrade > > carefully and keep better track of what you have installed etc. > > Can I run xen on lenny with the default packages ? Etch has kernels > named xen and xen-vserver, lenny has only vserver, and when I tried > to find info about that I only found people having problems with lenny. >lenny is testing, so some problems happen from time to time. Usually things can be figured out, fixed or at least worked around. If you are willing to work through potential roblems give it a shot. Otherwise stick with the stable packages and let others work out the problems. It all depends on your willingness to try things and work through potential problems. Best of luck, Todd> > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Bug#636552: xen-hypervisor-4.1-i386: Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
- Problems installing windows 2003 std and x64 as guest
- xen xm list: DomUs blocked
- FC5 and Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
- Windows 2003 Server Installation Problem in Centos 5 Xen 3.0.3-25.0.4.