Kalle, I am running Xen 3.2.0 with a custom 2.6.21 kernel. There are a few issues and it took me a lot of kernel reconfigs and builds to get it working. The reason I moved to the new kernel was that no patches were working for me to get support for the Intel 965GM family of display adapters. That being said, I came across a Mercurial repository that has Xen patched kernels with Dom0 support. http://hg.et.redhat.com/kernel-dev/ In that directory you will see that there are tons of kernels and options. The one that I am using is the ehabkost/linux.2.6.21-xen-3.1.0 kernel. The thing you have to ensure is that you look through every section during the configuration to find the Xen related options. The first option that is a must is under Processor Type and Features, make sure you check Enable Xen Compatible Kernel. This will open up a section called XEN in the kernel config menu. Go into the XEN config area and select Privileged Guest (Domain 0) Support. After that just tweak the kernel until it works with your system. Make sure that AHCI and all the main USB drivers are compiled as modules and it should work. NOTE: you will need to go through the regular Xen 3.2 install from source and build the 2.6.18.8 kernel that comes with that. Once that is done, download 2.6.21 xen patched kernel compile then change the line in GRUB. Let me know if this works for you. -Tait On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:45 +0200, Kalle wrote:> Hi, > > You are right about my over-angry attitude :) > > I know that XEN dosen''t suppoert newer kernel''s then 2.6.18, but i really > don''t care if that works. Actually im pretty happy for this kernel, it''s > stable and it''s working great on my production environment. > > I have setup two physical server''s what each has two DomU''s. (2xfront and > 2xnode.) That setup is 95% faulty tolerant and load-balanced. > > This project would be ready to production, but i can''t get OCFS2 work with > DRBD. There''s a bug in OCFS2 hertbeat. There''s patch available but it''s > only on 2.6.17 and 2.6.20. So I was thinking that it would be easier to > change kernel then modify those patches. > > If anyone has any experience working with DRBD + OCFS2 and Xenified kernel > please report :) If and when i get this project done I will make good > "Load-balanced and faulty tolerant LAMP environment using Xen and > Ultramonkey" > > But this problem is looking to be too hard for me to solve. > > So once again. If someone knows howto apply that ''OCFS2 add_bio patch'' to > Xenified 2.6.18 kernel i would be more then happy little admin. > Or howto to patch 2.6.20 with Dom0 support. > > Regard, > Kalle > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > > > Hi Kalle, > > > > I think you''re a bit over-angry. So I suggest taking a walk outside in some > > park to calm down and then come here again for questions. > > > > About documentation, I agree with you. It''s unfortunately a bit trial and > > error. > > > > About kernel, newer kernels than 2.6.18 are not supported by XEN. These are > > distribution specific. There''s no official patch for kernels above 2.6.18. > > So I suggest using 2.6.18 until Xen supports a higher version kernel. > > > > I agree with you in the sense that this kernel is pretty old now. But it > > works good for server deployments and it''s pretty stable, which is more > > wanted for virtualization goals than having some more hardware support and > > some other new features. > > > > Hope that Xen developers move to a newer kernel in the near future, or > > possibly integrate it upstream to all kernels somehow. > > > > DomU is currently supported above 2.6.23, but you won''t get fb or some other > > xen specific devices. Just vbd (disks) and network. > > > > For mercurial, I had no issues in my Ubuntu 7.10 system to download and > > build xen 3.2.0 along with the kernel. just make a "hg clone" to the > > mercurial repository address. Then when you say "make world" on your system > > (if your system has all packages necessary for compiling kernels and stuff), > > it will download the kernel 2.6.18 automatically, patch it automatically and > > start compiling. It may ask for one or more questions during the kernel > > configuration though. > > > > I had no issues whatsoever about this procedure, always went smoothly even > > in test builds. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Emre > > > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 12:11 PM, Kalle <kalle@addikti.net> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Firts of all i have to say that Xen is nice project and i propably can''t > >> live without it. > >> But that''s about all positive I have on my mind. > >> > >> Where are all recent documents? > >> Why does those document have to hide so badly that normal human can''t find > >> those. > >> Or is it like that there are no document''s and i have to try -> fail -> > >> try etc... > >> This is really starting to piss me off right now.. > >> > >> I want to compile newer kernel then 2.6.18 with dom0 support. > >> Im using Xen 3.2.0 what ships with absolutily outdated / crap > >> documentation. > >> I can''t find any information with google that is relevant. > >> All outdated and crap. > >> > >> The install of this version also lacks. > >> It has no idea howto download the kernel from mercurial. > >> I have tested that on Debian Etch And Debian Lenny. > >> I needed to manually download that kernel. > >> > >> > >> So to questions.. > >> > >> - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? > >> - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? > >> - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? > >> > >> No, im not interested to backporting some shitty Fedora kernel''s. > >> No, im not familiar to customize old patches to work newer kernel''s. > >> > >> Actually im not even so mad to Xen, just little. > >> Im actually really fucking pissed that this project is not supported good > >> enough in Debian. > >> I don''t want to change distro to something like Fedora or Ubuntu just to > >> get newer kernel. > >> There has to be way to port those patches to vanilla kernel, right? > >> I just want to find thise patches. > >> > >> And could someone please delete the whole wiki, because that information > >> is so outdated that no one does anything with that. > >> > >> Sorry my bad English and sorry about the way I present my thougs.. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Kalle > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Xen-users mailing list > >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Emre Erenoglu > > erenoglu@gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, Firts of all i have to say that Xen is nice project and i propably can''t live without it. But that''s about all positive I have on my mind. Where are all recent documents? Why does those document have to hide so badly that normal human can''t find those. Or is it like that there are no document''s and i have to try -> fail -> try etc... This is really starting to piss me off right now.. I want to compile newer kernel then 2.6.18 with dom0 support. Im using Xen 3.2.0 what ships with absolutily outdated / crap documentation. I can''t find any information with google that is relevant. All outdated and crap. The install of this version also lacks. It has no idea howto download the kernel from mercurial. I have tested that on Debian Etch And Debian Lenny. I needed to manually download that kernel. So to questions.. - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? No, im not interested to backporting some shitty Fedora kernel''s. No, im not familiar to customize old patches to work newer kernel''s. Actually im not even so mad to Xen, just little. Im actually really fucking pissed that this project is not supported good enough in Debian. I don''t want to change distro to something like Fedora or Ubuntu just to get newer kernel. There has to be way to port those patches to vanilla kernel, right? I just want to find thise patches. And could someone please delete the whole wiki, because that information is so outdated that no one does anything with that. Sorry my bad English and sorry about the way I present my thougs.. Regards, Kalle _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi Kalle, I think you''re a bit over-angry. So I suggest taking a walk outside in some park to calm down and then come here again for questions. About documentation, I agree with you. It''s unfortunately a bit trial and error. About kernel, newer kernels than 2.6.18 are not supported by XEN. These are distribution specific. There''s no official patch for kernels above 2.6.18. So I suggest using 2.6.18 until Xen supports a higher version kernel. I agree with you in the sense that this kernel is pretty old now. But it works good for server deployments and it''s pretty stable, which is more wanted for virtualization goals than having some more hardware support and some other new features. Hope that Xen developers move to a newer kernel in the near future, or possibly integrate it upstream to all kernels somehow. DomU is currently supported above 2.6.23, but you won''t get fb or some other xen specific devices. Just vbd (disks) and network. For mercurial, I had no issues in my Ubuntu 7.10 system to download and build xen 3.2.0 along with the kernel. just make a "hg clone" to the mercurial repository address. Then when you say "make world" on your system (if your system has all packages necessary for compiling kernels and stuff), it will download the kernel 2.6.18 automatically, patch it automatically and start compiling. It may ask for one or more questions during the kernel configuration though. I had no issues whatsoever about this procedure, always went smoothly even in test builds. Best regards, Emre On Jan 24, 2008 12:11 PM, Kalle <kalle@addikti.net> wrote:> Hi, > > Firts of all i have to say that Xen is nice project and i propably can''t > live without it. > But that''s about all positive I have on my mind. > > Where are all recent documents? > Why does those document have to hide so badly that normal human can''t find > those. > Or is it like that there are no document''s and i have to try -> fail -> > try etc... > This is really starting to piss me off right now.. > > I want to compile newer kernel then 2.6.18 with dom0 support. > Im using Xen 3.2.0 what ships with absolutily outdated / crap > documentation. > I can''t find any information with google that is relevant. > All outdated and crap. > > The install of this version also lacks. > It has no idea howto download the kernel from mercurial. > I have tested that on Debian Etch And Debian Lenny. > I needed to manually download that kernel. > > > So to questions.. > > - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? > - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? > - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? > > No, im not interested to backporting some shitty Fedora kernel''s. > No, im not familiar to customize old patches to work newer kernel''s. > > Actually im not even so mad to Xen, just little. > Im actually really fucking pissed that this project is not supported good > enough in Debian. > I don''t want to change distro to something like Fedora or Ubuntu just to > get newer kernel. > There has to be way to port those patches to vanilla kernel, right? > I just want to find thise patches. > > And could someone please delete the whole wiki, because that information > is so outdated that no one does anything with that. > > Sorry my bad English and sorry about the way I present my thougs.. > > Regards, > Kalle > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >-- Emre Erenoglu erenoglu@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, You are right about my over-angry attitude :) I know that XEN dosen''t suppoert newer kernel''s then 2.6.18, but i really don''t care if that works. Actually im pretty happy for this kernel, it''s stable and it''s working great on my production environment. I have setup two physical server''s what each has two DomU''s. (2xfront and 2xnode.) That setup is 95% faulty tolerant and load-balanced. This project would be ready to production, but i can''t get OCFS2 work with DRBD. There''s a bug in OCFS2 hertbeat. There''s patch available but it''s only on 2.6.17 and 2.6.20. So I was thinking that it would be easier to change kernel then modify those patches. If anyone has any experience working with DRBD + OCFS2 and Xenified kernel please report :) If and when i get this project done I will make good "Load-balanced and faulty tolerant LAMP environment using Xen and Ultramonkey" But this problem is looking to be too hard for me to solve. So once again. If someone knows howto apply that ''OCFS2 add_bio patch'' to Xenified 2.6.18 kernel i would be more then happy little admin. Or howto to patch 2.6.20 with Dom0 support. Regard, Kalle On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Emre Erenoglu wrote:> Hi Kalle, > > I think you''re a bit over-angry. So I suggest taking a walk outside in some > park to calm down and then come here again for questions. > > About documentation, I agree with you. It''s unfortunately a bit trial and > error. > > About kernel, newer kernels than 2.6.18 are not supported by XEN. These are > distribution specific. There''s no official patch for kernels above 2.6.18. > So I suggest using 2.6.18 until Xen supports a higher version kernel. > > I agree with you in the sense that this kernel is pretty old now. But it > works good for server deployments and it''s pretty stable, which is more > wanted for virtualization goals than having some more hardware support and > some other new features. > > Hope that Xen developers move to a newer kernel in the near future, or > possibly integrate it upstream to all kernels somehow. > > DomU is currently supported above 2.6.23, but you won''t get fb or some other > xen specific devices. Just vbd (disks) and network. > > For mercurial, I had no issues in my Ubuntu 7.10 system to download and > build xen 3.2.0 along with the kernel. just make a "hg clone" to the > mercurial repository address. Then when you say "make world" on your system > (if your system has all packages necessary for compiling kernels and stuff), > it will download the kernel 2.6.18 automatically, patch it automatically and > start compiling. It may ask for one or more questions during the kernel > configuration though. > > I had no issues whatsoever about this procedure, always went smoothly even > in test builds. > > Best regards, > > Emre > > > On Jan 24, 2008 12:11 PM, Kalle <kalle@addikti.net> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Firts of all i have to say that Xen is nice project and i propably can''t >> live without it. >> But that''s about all positive I have on my mind. >> >> Where are all recent documents? >> Why does those document have to hide so badly that normal human can''t find >> those. >> Or is it like that there are no document''s and i have to try -> fail -> >> try etc... >> This is really starting to piss me off right now.. >> >> I want to compile newer kernel then 2.6.18 with dom0 support. >> Im using Xen 3.2.0 what ships with absolutily outdated / crap >> documentation. >> I can''t find any information with google that is relevant. >> All outdated and crap. >> >> The install of this version also lacks. >> It has no idea howto download the kernel from mercurial. >> I have tested that on Debian Etch And Debian Lenny. >> I needed to manually download that kernel. >> >> >> So to questions.. >> >> - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? >> - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? >> - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? >> >> No, im not interested to backporting some shitty Fedora kernel''s. >> No, im not familiar to customize old patches to work newer kernel''s. >> >> Actually im not even so mad to Xen, just little. >> Im actually really fucking pissed that this project is not supported good >> enough in Debian. >> I don''t want to change distro to something like Fedora or Ubuntu just to >> get newer kernel. >> There has to be way to port those patches to vanilla kernel, right? >> I just want to find thise patches. >> >> And could someone please delete the whole wiki, because that information >> is so outdated that no one does anything with that. >> >> Sorry my bad English and sorry about the way I present my thougs.. >> >> Regards, >> Kalle >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > > > -- > Emre Erenoglu > erenoglu@gmail.com >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Christian Tramnitz
2008-Jan-24 12:57 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Xen 3.2.0 -> Newer kernel and more..
> So once again. If someone knows howto apply that ''OCFS2 add_bio patch'' > to Xenified 2.6.18 kernel i would be more then happy little admin. > Or howto to patch 2.6.20 with Dom0 support.Gentoo has a 2.6.20 xenified Dom0 kernel which is running fine for me for a couple weeks... Best regards, Christian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, Thanks man. I actually get that OCFS2 to work with my 2.6.18.8-xen but it was bit of a challenge. My cluster is now up and running and need lot''s of testing. But im pretty sure that OCFS2 it''s not the one im looking for, because it looks to be pretty damn slow at least on my setup. Regards, Kalle On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Christian Tramnitz wrote:>> So once again. If someone knows howto apply that ''OCFS2 add_bio patch'' to >> Xenified 2.6.18 kernel i would be more then happy little admin. >> Or howto to patch 2.6.20 with Dom0 support. > > Gentoo has a 2.6.20 xenified Dom0 kernel which is running fine for me for a > couple weeks... > > > Best regards, > Christian > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Holm Kapschitzki
2008-Jan-24 14:07 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.2.0 -> Newer kernel and more..
Emre Erenoglu schrieb:> About kernel, newer kernels than 2.6.18 are not supported by XEN. These > are distribution specific. There''s no official patch for kernels above > 2.6.18. So I suggest using 2.6.18 until Xen supports a higher version > kernel. >Sorry, I doesnt unserstand nothing at all. I asked in the list how to use a newer kernel (xen-patched) with xen 3.1. So the answer was - Its just a kernel - no problem. For example: Gentoo hast a 2.6.20-6 xen patched kernel. So my question again: Its is possible to use this kernel under etch with xen 3.1? So it is ok to compile the gentoo kernel in etch und load this kernel with grub for dom0 after installing xen 3.1 out of the sources? greetings Holm _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Holm Kapschitzki
2008-Jan-24 14:14 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.2.0 -> Newer kernel and more..
Kalle schrieb:> > - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? > - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? > - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? >whats about this link? http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ I ll see linux-image-2.6.23-1-xen-686_2.6.23-3~snapshot.10051_i386.deb You have tried this under etch? Or its not possible cause of dependencies. So compiling out of the sources? greetings Holm _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, That kernel only works on unprivileged domain (DomU) Newest "working" kernel is from Ubuntu (2.6.22) but console hangs when it mount the filesystem. I have tryed both console=tty0 and console=xvc0 Regards, Kalle On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Holm Kapschitzki wrote:> Kalle schrieb: > >> >> - Is there somewhere Xen patches for newer then 2.6.18 kernel? If where? >> - What is the "support" in main kernel line for Xen? Only DomU? >> - And again -> Where is those god damn patches for vanilla kernel? >> > > whats about this link? > > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ > > I ll see linux-image-2.6.23-1-xen-686_2.6.23-3~snapshot.10051_i386.deb > > You have tried this under etch? Or its not possible cause of dependencies. So > compiling out of the sources? > > greetings Holm > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, Thanks for reply. On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Tom Brown wrote:> > > AFAIK, any network filesytem is going to be "slow" as compared to afilesystem on an exclusively used virtual block device. Mount root and the rest of the> operating system on some sort of dedicated block device and only used ashared network filesytem for the parts of the system that _need_ to be accessed from> multiple servers.Of course. I should explain little better. - Both Dom0''s are Intel Core 2. - Xen build from sources (3.2.0) - LVM2. DomU''s uses ext3 for root (/) partition and OCFS2 for /www and then of course swap partition. Inside /www is Apache and PHP compiled from sources. Of course some changes to apache for .pid and so on... I have tested DRBD & OCFS2 two ways. - DRBD & OCFS2 in Dom0 -> /dev/drbd0 shared to DomU as normal vbd. - DRBD % OCFS2 in DomU. !!! HOX !!! "tests" i mention below is only "tests". Everyone know''s that those are not best way to make test. I make better test tomorrow when go work. 1) Writing speed is actually good if writing zero to one file. Like ''dd if=/dev/zero of=./foobar.bin bs=4096 count=40000'' -> Write speed ~60Mb/sek But when change input to /dev/urandom speed dropped -> ~5.7Mb/sek 2) Downloaded apache-2.2.9.tar.gz to /www. Extracting works good enought, but nothing compared to normal ext3 vbd. But when delete ./httpd-2.2.9 which is around 30Mb it takes over 60sec before operation is done!!! How can deleting be slower then "inserting" ?? Im gonna make lot''s of more testing tomorrow.> If all you are trying to get is migration capabilities, then usesomething like AOE or iSCSI instead. Yea. Im aware bought of those. It just that im trying todo "Two node load-balanced high-availability LAMP environment" Im certainly aware that i need third machine for backups and that this would be much easier with some kind of storage backend.> (Best to use an initrd so that you can actually have the domU look afterthe details... which will go with it if it gets migrated) Im sorry, but can You explain this little better? Regards, Kalle On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Tom Brown wrote:> > > AFAIK, any network filesytem is going to be "slow" as compared to a > filesystem on an exclusively used virtual block device. Mount root and the > rest of the operating system on some sort of dedicated block device and only > used a shared network filesytem for the parts of the system that _need_ to be > accessed from multiple servers. > > If all you are trying to get is migration capabilities, then use something > like AOE or iSCSI instead. > > (Best to use an initrd so that you can actually have the domU look after the > details... which will go with it if it gets migrated) > > -Tom > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Kalle wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks man. >> >> I actually get that OCFS2 to work with my 2.6.18.8-xen but it was bit of a >> challenge. >> >> My cluster is now up and running and need lot''s of testing. >> But im pretty sure that OCFS2 it''s not the one im looking for, because it >> looks to be pretty damn slow at least on my setup. >> >> Regards, >> Kalle >> >> >> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Christian Tramnitz wrote: >> >>> > So once again. If someone knows howto apply that ''OCFS2 add_bio patch'' >>> > to Xenified 2.6.18 kernel i would be more then happy little admin. >>> > Or howto to patch 2.6.20 with Dom0 support. >>> >>> Gentoo has a 2.6.20 xenified Dom0 kernel which is running fine for me for >>> a couple weeks... >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > tbrown@BareMetal.com | Courage is doing what you''re afraid to do. > http://BareMetal.com/ | There can be no courage unless you''re scared. > | - Eddie Rickenbacker >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Holm Kapschitzki schrieb:> Emre Erenoglu schrieb: > >> About kernel, newer kernels than 2.6.18 are not supported by XEN. >> These are distribution specific. There''s no official patch for kernels >> above 2.6.18. So I suggest using 2.6.18 until Xen supports a higher >> version kernel. >> > > Sorry, I doesnt unserstand nothing at all. I asked in the list how to > use a newer kernel (xen-patched) with xen 3.1. So the answer was - Its > just a kernel - no problem.Basically, yes. If you don''t mind to spend a view hours/days/weeks to rework the patches ;)> For example: Gentoo hast a 2.6.20-6 xen patched kernel. So my question > again: > > Its is possible to use this kernel under etch with xen 3.1? So it is ok > to compile the gentoo kernel in etch und load this kernel with grub for > dom0 after installing xen 3.1 out of the sources?Speaking for the xen part of this question, yes, you are able to use any xenified kernel you want as dom0, if - it contains dom0 patches (not only linux upstream domU basic support) - uses the same model as your hypervisor (i386/i386pae/x86_64) - has support (or compatibility enabled) for your hypervisor version I would expect more incompatibilities with the different distro flavours (e.g. multilib lib vs. lib64, udev, /proc, sysfs, ...). The question i would like to ask is: What is your primary goal with a higher version number? Well, the 2.6.18.8 lacks support for a few brand-new chipsets, but my experiences shows me this kernel working rock-solid. (E.g. compared to self-made "oldconfig" 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 with reworked ubuntu dom0 patches.) cheers, Stephan _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2.6.18.8 didn''t work for me on ubuntu 7.1 (server/amd64) but the solution is easy: cd /usr/src && wget http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/3.2.0/xen-3.2.0.tar.gz && tar -xzf xen-3.2.0.tar.gz && cd xen-3.2.0 make all && make install aptitude install linux-image-xen reboot and enjoy xen with a 2.6.22-14-xen ubuntu xen-kernel which runs fine.> Well, the 2.6.18.8 lacks support for a few brand-new chipsets, but my experiences > shows me this kernel working rock-solid._______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users