What''s the problem whith xen 3.1? Does it run not stable? Does sombody use xen 3.1 productive? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Yes, here it runs stable. Marco Am Do, 30.08.2007, 09:09, schrieb Frank:> What''s the problem whith xen 3.1? Does it run not stable? Does sombody > use xen 3.1 productive?_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
We also find it to be stable, and fast. -- -- Tom Mornini, Co-CEO -- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting -- Support, Scalability, Reliability -- (866) 518-YARD (9273) x201 On Aug 30, 2007, at 12:09 AM, Frank wrote:> What''s the problem whith xen 3.1? Does it run not stable? Does > sombody use xen 3.1 productive? > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> What''s the problem whith xen 3.1? Does it run not stable? Does sombody > use xen 3.1 productive?It''s intended as a stable release. The xen-3.1-testing.hg tree contains 3.1 plus some fixes that have been backported subsequestly. I believe RedHat are intending to roll 3.1 into a future update to RHEL5. Cheers, Mark -- Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat? And no pedals! Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard? Dave: Skateboards have wheels. Mark: My wheel has a wheel! _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users