John Hannfield
2007-May-04 11:00 UTC
[Xen-users] Bug 339 - peth1: received packet with own address as source address
Hello, I have two xen servers on the same subnet, and I''m seeing these messages logged every minute to /var/log/messages peth1: received packet with own address as source address It''s in bugzilla as bug 339 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 It seems to be due to both machines using the same hardware address for dom0 peth1. So I have implemented the patch by Cyrus Katrak and changed one machine to FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:FF However it still occurs. There could be a (unkown to me) dom0 server on the network with this MAC address, so my question is: Can I just assign any MAC address I want to peth1 ? Like one of the private range that I use for my guests? Or does it have to be FE:FF:FF:FF:xx:xx ? -- John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Cyrus Katrak
2007-May-04 14:43 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Bug 339 - peth1: received packet with own address as source address
After implementing the patch, you must edit the line that says: macid="F0" on ONE of the dom0''s. E.G: on Your first dom0 use: macid="F0" on your second dom0 use: macid="F1" You mentioned the possiblity of an unkown dom0 on the network. I believe you can use any MAC you want, but changing macid="F0" to some other 2-hex digit ID should provide you with enough options. Please let me know if this works -Cyrus On 5/4/07, John Hannfield <hal9020@gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, > > I have two xen servers on the same subnet, and I''m seeing these messages > logged every minute to /var/log/messages > > peth1: received packet with own address as source address > > It''s in bugzilla as bug 339 > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 > > It seems to be due to both machines using the same hardware address > for dom0 peth1. So I have implemented the patch by Cyrus Katrak > and changed one machine to > > FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:FF > > However it still occurs. There could be a (unkown to me) dom0 server > on the network with this MAC address, so my question is: > Can I just assign any MAC address I want to peth1 ? > Like one of the private range that I use for my guests? > Or does it have to be FE:FF:FF:FF:xx:xx ? > > -- > > John >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
John Hannfield
2007-May-04 16:10 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Bug 339 - peth1: received packet with own address as source address
Hi Cyrus,> on Your first dom0 use: macid="F0" > on your second dom0 use: macid="F1"Well I left the first one at the default, and patched the second box. Ifconfig shows my mac addresses as: box1 peth0 HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF box2 peth0 HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:00 Actually, grepping ifconfig for HWaddr, is interesting: guest1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF guest2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E5:27:BA peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:00 vif0.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:00 xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:00 It shows that peth0, vif0.0 and the bridge all share this MAC address. Is that correct I wonder? It''s similar on the other box. box1 runs xen 3.0.3 and is not showing any "received packet with own address" in it''s logs. They only show up on box2, which is running 3.0.5-rc4 patched with the code to change the mac address. I will try changing it again, but I suspected there is not another machine on the network with this mac address (FE:FF:FF:FF:F0:00 ) and that there is something else wrong! John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
John Hannfield
2007-May-04 18:58 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Bug 339 - peth1: received packet with own address as source address
For what it is worth, I have tried changing the macid to several other hex digits, restarted the box2, but I am still getting the "recieved packet with own address" errors. peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 vif0.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 May 4 19:54:40 box2 kernel: peth0: received packet with own address as source address May 4 19:54:40 box2 kernel: peth0: received packet with own address as source address It can''t be another dom0 on the network with my random chosen MAC address. Are there any other causes of this problem? John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Lockenvitz, Jan \(EXT\)
2007-May-07 06:00 UTC
AW: [Xen-users] Re: Bug 339 - peth1: received packet with own addressas source address
Hi, we had similar problems half a year a go. As far as I can remember it was only on our IBM Servers. We installed the available BIOS and NIC Firmware updates and the problem was solved! Normaly you shouldn''t even see this MAC on the LAN because in ifconfig it is set to NOARP. regards, Jan> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] Im Auftrag von > John Hannfield > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 20:58 > An: Cyrus Katrak > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Betreff: [Xen-users] Re: Bug 339 - peth1: received packet > with own addressas source address > > For what it is worth, I have tried changing the macid to several > other hex digits, > restarted the box2, but I am still getting the "recieved packet with > own address" > errors. > > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 > vif0.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 > xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:A7:00 > > May 4 19:54:40 box2 kernel: peth0: received packet with own address > as source address > May 4 19:54:40 box2 kernel: peth0: received packet with own address > as source address > > It can''t be another dom0 on the network with my random chosen > MAC address. > Are there any other causes of this problem? > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users