Neal Probert
2006-Apr-03 12:41 UTC
[Xen-users] Vif network interfaces dropped tx packets, rsyncd problems
If I do an ifconfig from Dom0, I see that the vif#.# interfaces have
dropped tx packets. The DomU machines look fine. Running Debian Sarge
testing, Xen 3.0.1 testing on amd64.
Rsyncd still doesn''t work on Dom0, which is essential to our BackupPC
process.
Apr 3 01:10:56 localhost rsyncd[14762]: connect from archive
(152.160.178.30)
Apr 3 01:10:56 localhost rsyncd[14762]: rsync on . from
backuppc@archive (152.1
60.178.30)
Apr 3 01:11:28 localhost rsyncd[14762]: rsync: writefd_unbuffered
failed to wri
te 4 bytes: phase "send_file_entry" [sender]: Broken pipe (32)
Apr 3 01:11:28 localhost rsyncd[14762]: rsync error: error in rsync
protocol da
ta stream (code 12) at io.c(1126) [sender]
Btw, I''ve heard comments that Xen stable really isn''t
"stable". Imho,
Xen really isn''t ready for primetime production use just yet.
I''ve been
at it for 3 weeks and I still can''t resolve the issues to my
satisfaction and have the confidence to be running Xen.
Suggestions?
Thanks.
--
*** ProbeStar Technical Systems, LLC. ***
Software Engineering and Application Development
==// Neal W. Probert (President) / Email: nprobert@probestar.com //
=// Web: www.probestar.com / Phone: 734-834-7805 //// Fax:
/ Cell: 734-834-7805 //=
"Technology is a gift of God. After the gift of life it is perhaps
the greatest of God''s gifts. It is the mother of civilizations, of
arts and of sciences"
--- Freeman Dyson Infinite in all directions
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Matt Ayres
2006-Apr-03 14:25 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Vif network interfaces dropped tx packets, rsyncd problems
Neal Probert wrote:> If I do an ifconfig from Dom0, I see that the vif#.# interfaces have > dropped tx packets. The DomU machines look fine. Running Debian Sarge > testing, Xen 3.0.1 testing on amd64. >This may sound weird to you, but try running -unstable. 3.0.1 is definitely not what you want to be running right now. There have been many changes to the network interface code since 3.0.1 and -unstable will be tagged as 3.0.2 shortly (at least I hope so). Under the current development model you are much better testing under -unstable so bugs such as this can be fixed -- your bug may already be fixed and the developers can better provide patches. By testing under -unstable it''ll help you to know what code is good to run on your production servers. Thank you, Matt Ayres _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users