Hi,
I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the FUSE project.
I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0.
the fuse/examples/hello test works.
Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS
ltspfs# ./configure
checking fuse.h usability... no
checking fuse.h presence... no
checking for fuse.h... no
and config.log says
configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability
configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
In file included from /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23,
from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9,
from conftest.c:65:
/usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error Please add
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags!
so I thought
/configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is
already done in the config script.
I''m at a loss. :(
Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here?
and if so,
Any instructions to install it on a debain testing?
Thanks in advance.
Chris.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Chris Fanning wrote:> Hi, > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the FUSE project. > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS > ltspfs# ./configure > checking fuse.h usability... no > checking fuse.h presence... no > checking for fuse.h... no >I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not present (have you installed the fuse development package?). Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, fuse is more than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. You''ll need to compile fuse against Xen. FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any problems with it in Debian. Regards, Anthony Liguori> and config.log says > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 > In file included from /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > from conftest.c:65: > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error Please add > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > so I thought > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > already done in the config script. > > I''m at a loss. :( > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? >Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation.> and if so, > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > Thanks in advance. > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> (have you installed the fuse development package?).I installed it from source> > checking fuse.h usability... no > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > checking for fuse.h... no > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not presentIt does seem that fuse.h and family are found. compile.log says:> > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error Please add > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags!and /usr/local/include/fuse/fue_common.h incluse this code. /* This interface uses 64 bit off_t */ #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64 #error Please add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! #endif what does that mean? Chris. On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:> Chris Fanning wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the FUSE project. > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS > > ltspfs# ./configure > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > checking for fuse.h... no > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not present > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, fuse is more > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. You''ll > need to compile fuse against Xen. > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any problems > with it in Debian. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > and config.log says > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 > > In file included from /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > from conftest.c:65: > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error Please add > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > so I thought > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > already done in the config script. > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > and if so, > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Chris. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Fanning > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:19 > To: Anthony Liguori > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > I installed it from source > > > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > > checking for fuse.h... no > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not present > > It does seem that fuse.h and family are found. > compile.log says: > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > Please add > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > and /usr/local/include/fuse/fue_common.h incluse this code. > > /* This interface uses 64 bit off_t */ > #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64 > #error Please add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > #endif > > what does that mean?It means just what it says: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 should be the value set in the build environment. For some reason, it appears that it''s not [or the compiler is utterly broken - but that''s unlikely]. Adding it as you suggested originaly may well help - or it may not. I don''t know enough about the fuse project to say for sure - but it''s almost certainly not to do with which version of glibc that you''re using. And I would examine why it says there''s no fuse.h in the configuration output - if you say that you''ve installed the fuse devel package, fuse.h should be found. Try something like "find / -name fuse.h -print" and see if it lists it - if not, you''re missing something important, I would think. -- Mats> > Chris. > > > On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Chris Fanning wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the > FUSE project. > > > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS ltspfs# ./configure > checking > > > fuse.h usability... no checking fuse.h presence... no > checking for > > > fuse.h... no > > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is > not present > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, > fuse is more > > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. > > You''ll need to compile fuse against Xen. > > > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any > > problems with it in Debian. > > > > Regards, > > > > Anthony Liguori > > > and config.log says > > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 In file > included from > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > > from conftest.c:65: > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > Please add > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > so I thought > > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > > already done in the config script. > > > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > > and if so, > > > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > Chris. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
ok. I edited /usr/local/incluse/fuse/fuse_common.h and added #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 now it makes ok. no warnings. I''ll have a look about to see if this has any nasty secondary effects. thanks all. Chris. On 2/14/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@amd.com> wrote:> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Fanning > > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:19 > > To: Anthony Liguori > > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > I installed it from source > > > > > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > > > checking for fuse.h... no > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not present > > > > It does seem that fuse.h and family are found. > > compile.log says: > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > Please add > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > and /usr/local/include/fuse/fue_common.h incluse this code. > > > > /* This interface uses 64 bit off_t */ > > #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64 > > #error Please add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > #endif > > > > what does that mean? > > It means just what it says: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 should be the value set > in the build environment. For some reason, it appears that it''s not [or > the compiler is utterly broken - but that''s unlikely]. Adding it as you > suggested originaly may well help - or it may not. I don''t know enough > about the fuse project to say for sure - but it''s almost certainly not > to do with which version of glibc that you''re using. > > And I would examine why it says there''s no fuse.h in the configuration > output - if you say that you''ve installed the fuse devel package, fuse.h > should be found. Try something like "find / -name fuse.h -print" and see > if it lists it - if not, you''re missing something important, I would > think. > > -- > Mats > > > > Chris. > > > > > > On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Chris Fanning wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the > > FUSE project. > > > > > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS ltspfs# ./configure > > checking > > > > fuse.h usability... no checking fuse.h presence... no > > checking for > > > > fuse.h... no > > > > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is > > not present > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > > > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, > > fuse is more > > > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. > > > You''ll need to compile fuse against Xen. > > > > > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any > > > problems with it in Debian. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Anthony Liguori > > > > and config.log says > > > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 In file > > included from > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > > > from conftest.c:65: > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > Please add > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > > > so I thought > > > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > > > already done in the config script. > > > > > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > > > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > > > and if so, > > > > > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Fanning > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:33 > To: Petersson, Mats > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > ok. I edited /usr/local/incluse/fuse/fuse_common.h > and added > #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > > now it makes ok. no warnings. > I''ll have a look about to see if this has any nasty secondary effects.It would most likely be VERY apparent if that''s the case... Either kernel oops or complete disaster in the user-mode file-system. -- Mats> > thanks all. > Chris. > > On 2/14/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@amd.com> wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Chris > > > Fanning > > > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:19 > > > To: Anthony Liguori > > > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > > > > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > I installed it from source > > > > > > > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > > > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > > > > checking for fuse.h... no > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not > > > > present > > > > > > It does seem that fuse.h and family are found. > > > compile.log says: > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > > Please add > > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > and /usr/local/include/fuse/fue_common.h incluse this code. > > > > > > /* This interface uses 64 bit off_t */ #if > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64 > > > #error Please add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > #endif > > > > > > what does that mean? > > > > It means just what it says: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 should be > the value > > set in the build environment. For some reason, it appears that it''s > > not [or the compiler is utterly broken - but that''s > unlikely]. Adding > > it as you suggested originaly may well help - or it may > not. I don''t > > know enough about the fuse project to say for sure - but > it''s almost > > certainly not to do with which version of glibc that you''re using. > > > > And I would examine why it says there''s no fuse.h in the > configuration > > output - if you say that you''ve installed the fuse devel package, > > fuse.h should be found. Try something like "find / -name fuse.h > > -print" and see if it lists it - if not, you''re missing something > > important, I would think. > > > > -- > > Mats > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Chris Fanning wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the > > > FUSE project. > > > > > > > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > > > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > > > > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS ltspfs# ./configure > > > checking > > > > > fuse.h usability... no checking fuse.h presence... no > > > checking for > > > > > fuse.h... no > > > > > > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is > > > not present > > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > > > > > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, > > > fuse is more > > > > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. > > > > You''ll need to compile fuse against Xen. > > > > > > > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any > > > > problems with it in Debian. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Anthony Liguori > > > > > and config.log says > > > > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > > > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 In file > > > included from > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > > > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > > > > from conftest.c:65: > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > > Please add > > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > > > > > so I thought > > > > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > > > > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > > > > already done in the config script. > > > > > > > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > > > > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > > > > > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > > > > and if so, > > > > > > > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> It would most likely be VERY apparent if that''s the case... Either > kernel oops or complete disaster in the user-mode file-system.yes. but unfortunatley, my knowledge is limited turning this into a trail-and-error adventure. On the other hand, if I do get this working, it will all be changed when the xen kernel moves up from 2.6.12 because fuse is now included. Chris. On 2/14/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@amd.com> wrote:> > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Fanning > > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:33 > > To: Petersson, Mats > > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > > > ok. I edited /usr/local/incluse/fuse/fuse_common.h > > and added > > #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > > > > now it makes ok. no warnings. > > I''ll have a look about to see if this has any nasty secondary effects. > > It would most likely be VERY apparent if that''s the case... Either > kernel oops or complete disaster in the user-mode file-system. > > -- > Mats > > > > thanks all. > > Chris. > > > > On 2/14/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@amd.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Chris > > > > Fanning > > > > Sent: 14 February 2006 15:19 > > > > To: Anthony Liguori > > > > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] might XenSpecificGlibc help me? > > > > > > > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > > I installed it from source > > > > > > > > > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > > > > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > > > > > checking for fuse.h... no > > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not > > > > > present > > > > > > > > It does seem that fuse.h and family are found. > > > > compile.log says: > > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > > > Please add > > > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > > > and /usr/local/include/fuse/fue_common.h incluse this code. > > > > > > > > /* This interface uses 64 bit off_t */ #if > > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64 > > > > #error Please add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > what does that mean? > > > > > > It means just what it says: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 should be > > the value > > > set in the build environment. For some reason, it appears that it''s > > > not [or the compiler is utterly broken - but that''s > > unlikely]. Adding > > > it as you suggested originaly may well help - or it may > > not. I don''t > > > know enough about the fuse project to say for sure - but > > it''s almost > > > certainly not to do with which version of glibc that you''re using. > > > > > > And I would examine why it says there''s no fuse.h in the > > configuration > > > output - if you say that you''ve installed the fuse devel package, > > > fuse.h should be found. Try something like "find / -name fuse.h > > > -print" and see if it lists it - if not, you''re missing something > > > important, I would think. > > > > > > -- > > > Mats > > > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Chris Fanning wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the > > > > FUSE project. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > > > > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS ltspfs# ./configure > > > > checking > > > > > > fuse.h usability... no checking fuse.h presence... no > > > > checking for > > > > > > fuse.h... no > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is > > > > not present > > > > > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > > > > > > > > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, > > > > fuse is more > > > > > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. > > > > > You''ll need to compile fuse against Xen. > > > > > > > > > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any > > > > > problems with it in Debian. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Anthony Liguori > > > > > > and config.log says > > > > > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > > > > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 In file > > > > included from > > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > > > > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > > > > > from conftest.c:65: > > > > > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error > > > > Please add > > > > > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > > > > > > > > > so I thought > > > > > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > > > > > > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > > > > > already done in the config script. > > > > > > > > > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > > > > > > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > > > > > > > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > > > > > and if so, > > > > > > > > > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xen-users mailing list > > > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any problems > with it in Debian.Tell me more! I have two doubts/questions: 1. that fuse.h may not be your case because I have the problem when installing ltspfs and my not recommendable fuse_common.h fix.> #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 642. From what I can gather, fuse is statically linked to glibc because I get that "mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.disabled" warning again now. How did you do this with ubuntu Anthony? Chris. On 2/14/06, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:> Chris Fanning wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I''m trying to compile a fs -LTSPFS- that is based on the FUSE project. > > > > I have compiled and installed FUSE on dom0. > > the fuse/examples/hello test works. > > > > Now, when I attempt to compile LTSPFS > > ltspfs# ./configure > > checking fuse.h usability... no > > checking fuse.h presence... no > > checking for fuse.h... no > > > I think this is a pretty clear indication that fuse.h is not present > (have you installed the fuse development package?). > > Moreover, depending on which version of Xen you''re using, fuse is more > than likely not present and not a compile option in the kernel. You''ll > need to compile fuse against Xen. > > FWIW, I''ve done this before it Ubuntu so you shouldn''t have any problems > with it in Debian. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > and config.log says > > configure:3827: checking fuse.h usability > > configure:3839: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 > > In file included from /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse.h:23, > > from /usr/local/include/fuse.h:9, > > from conftest.c:65: > > /usr/local/include/fuse/fuse_common.h:30:2: error: #error Please add > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to your compile flags! > > > > so I thought > > /configure CFLAGS=-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > > but the author of the ltspfs says that -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > > already done in the config script. > > > > I''m at a loss. :( > > > > Might XenSpecificGlibc help me here? > > > Nope. The Xen glibc is only for performance with TLS emulation. > > and if so, > > > > Any instructions to install it on a debain testing? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Chris. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users