Molle Bestefich
2006-Jan-09 09:24 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Gordon Henderson wrote:> I was bitten with LVM some time back (maybe 18 months to 2 years) and then > I didn''t have time to track down the real cause, so resorted to just > doubling up on disk space (disk is cheap!) and running a nightly rsync to > create/update the snapshot (and you can make several days worth too with > some cleverness and not much more disk space), then dumping the snapshot > to tape... The 3-400GB volumes I have take less than an hour for the rsync > so it''s not a big impact in the middle of the night.Thanks for the tip :-). My current approach is to tar the entire filesystem to a "backup" partition and gzip it with the "--rsyncable" option. That way I can diff the backup tar''s and keep a whole load of backups online at a minimum of disk space. Doesn''t seem useful at first to have so many backups. But keep in mind that the less space each backup takes, the more often you can back up. With this approach I can backup every 24 hours which means less work is lost when I have to restore. Francois Barre:> Regarding snapshots, seems like XFS has some snapshot features (from > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/index.html : XFS supports filesystem > growth for mounted volumes, allows filesystem "freeze" and "thaw" > operations to support volume level snapshots, and provides an online > file defragmentation utility). > Did anyone play with this ? Could it be a good way to implement robust > and trustworthy snapshots ? > Anyway, I believe that snapshot logic shall live inside of filesystem > layer ; capability to have a filesystem freezed within a special > process, while other processes still modifying the fs could be great :Seeing as server virtualization is all the fuzz right now, what would be really cool IMHO would be a filesystem where one could make a block-by-block snapshot of the partition at _any_ point in time and have a consistent filesystem out of it, without doing any sort of freeze/unfreeze operations. This would allow you to do snapshotting and backup *outside* of your virtual machines, which is much more desirable than doing it from the inside. From the outside, your virtual machines can''t destroy the backup process, so you have guarantee that it gets done every time. And that your customers do not muck with it. You also have much better control of disk space usage. And you can make backups if the machine happens to be turned off. And consistent ones too, even if it has crashed. There''s probably other advantages I haven''t thought of :-). _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users