DIEDERIT@ing.boehringer-ingelheim.com
2005-Sep-12 08:11 UTC
[Xen-users] Iptabels problem NEWBIE!!!
Hi, i booted XEN succesfully.
Now i try to run ttylinux.
My ttylinux initial script looks like:
kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-xenU"
memory =64
nics = 1
ip = "148.191.106.100"
name = "ttylinux"
disk = [''file:/root/Desktop/ttylinux/ttylinux-xen,hda1,w
<file:/root/Desktop/ttylinux/ttylinux-xen,hda1,w> '']
root = "/dev/hda1 ro"
And while booting via xm create -c ttylinux the following error comes up adn
the systems stops booting (virtual system)
iptables v1.2.11: can''t initialize iptables table `filter'':
iptables who?
(do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
modprobe: could not parse modules.dep
iptables v1.2.11: can''t initialize iptables table `filter'':
iptables who?
(do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
modprobe: could not parse modules.dep
iptables v1.2.11: can''t initialize iptables table `filter'':
iptables who?
(do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
modprobe: could not parse modules.dep
iptables v1.2.11: can''t initialize iptables table `filter'':
iptables who?
(do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
done
The system is going down NOW !!
Sending SIGTERM to all processes.
Sending SIGKILL to all processes.
Please stand by while rebooting the system.
Restarting system.
How could i fix this error.
I''m using redhat server 3 as host!
Thomas Diederich
**************************************************
* Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG
* A Informationsverarbeitung / I*Net Solution Center
*
* Mail: diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com
<mailto:diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com>
* Phone: +49 (0)6132/77-98151
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> modprobe: could not parse modules.depYour modules.dep seems to be broken. Perhaps you could try loopback-mounting the filesystem you''re using for ttylinux, chrooting into it, and running depmod 2.6.11-xenU. HTH, Daniel -- Though I''m deep inside a storm it won''t defeat me, Floating free. Look out here comes trouble, Maybe I''m just pushing through a dream, But strange how things feel quite real to me. http://surreal.istic.org/ That which will guide the lost child back to her mother''s arms... EXILE. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
DIEDERIT@ing.boehringer-ingelheim.com
2005-Sep-12 11:35 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Iptabels problem NEWBIE!!!
No that won''t help. I fixed it, but it recomes when i Boot... Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:17 +0100 From: Daniel Hulme <dh286@cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Iptabels problem NEWBIE!!! To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Message-ID: <20050912111717.3a1fe39f@dh286.pem.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> modprobe: could not parse modules.depYour modules.dep seems to be broken. Perhaps you could try loopback-mounting the filesystem you''re using for ttylinux, chrooting into it, and running depmod 2.6.11-xenU. HTH, Daniel -- Though I''m deep inside a storm it won''t defeat me, Floating free. Look out here comes trouble, Maybe I''m just pushing through a dream, But strange how things feel quite real to me. http://surreal.istic.org/ That which will guide the lost child back to her mother''s arms... EXILE. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/attachments/20050912/a356 49b0/attachment.pgp ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:22:51 +0100 From: Daniel Hulme <dh286@cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen startup To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Message-ID: <20050912112251.2a0cce0e@dh286.pem.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-xen0 root=/dev/hda7 \ > ro hdc=ide-cd hdd=ide-cd vga=extended console=tty0This should be console=tty, I think. HTH, Daniel -- "And what if I assign a hundred programmers to it?" The master programmer shrugged. "Then the design will never be completed," he said. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22pgp+singing%22 <-- childish but funny http://surreal.istic.org/ <-- It''s like a DEATH CIRCUS! | keyid 885b170d -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/attachments/20050912/911c 3fbf/attachment.pgp ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users End of Xen-users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 42 **************************************** _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Monday 12 September 2005 13:35, DIEDERIT@ing.boehringer-ingelheim.com wrote:> No that won''t help. > I fixed it, but it recomes when i Boot...Did you compile your domU kernel with IP-Tables support? If yes, did you comile iptables statically or as modules? If you compiled iptables as modules, did you install the domU modules inside the domU filesystem? (domU kernel goes into dom0 filesystem, domU modules inside domU) can you modprobe other modules inside domU? Maybe try building your domU kernel statically (without modules support), much less can go wrong then. /Ernst _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> Hi, i booted XEN succesfully. > Now i try to run ttylinux. > My ttylinux initial script looks like:Hi,> kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-xenU" > memory =64 > nics = 1 > ip = "148.191.106.100" > name = "ttylinux" > disk = [''file:/root/Desktop/ttylinux/ttylinux-xen,hda1,w > <file:/root/Desktop/ttylinux/ttylinux-xen,hda1,w> ''] > root = "/dev/hda1 ro" > > And while booting via xm create -c ttylinux the following error comes up > adn > the systems stops booting (virtual system) > > iptables v1.2.11: can''t initialize iptables table `filter'': iptables who? > (do you need to insmod?) > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. > modprobe: could not parse modules.depOn Debian (Xen0 and XenU), i MUST install module-init-tools. Perhaps is the same on RedHat :( http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=module-init-tools&version=stable&arch=i386 Regards Franck -- http://www.linuxpourtous.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Since upgrading to the Fedora xen-2-20050823 and associated
kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 packages , I am getting funny reading from
top, both on dom0 and domU. Basically, top is reading load of 1.00 when
machine is basically idle.
top - 09:32:12 up 2 days, 22:52, 2 users, load average: 1.00,
1.00, 1.00
Tasks: 56 total, 2 running, 54 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 96.0% id, 3.3% wa, 0.0% hi,
0.0% si
Mem: 91476k total, 89220k used, 2256k free, 19024k buffers
Swap: 1572856k total, 548k used, 1572308k free, 18676k cached
Here are some details about the system.
dom0 kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4xenU #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 21:25:28
EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 1
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.70GHz
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 1694.498
cache size : 128 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : yes
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 3381.65
In my experience, the previous Xen, running the 1398 FC4 Xen kernels did
not have this behavior? Any ideas on what can be done to get my
''real''
load averages back?
--
Michael J. Baysek
Systems Analyst
Carnegie Mellon University
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 09:43 -0400, Michael J. Baysek wrote:> Since upgrading to the Fedora xen-2-20050823 and associated > kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 packages , I am getting funny reading from > top, both on dom0 and domU. Basically, top is reading load of 1.00 when > machine is basically idle. > > top - 09:32:12 up 2 days, 22:52, 2 users, load average: 1.00, > 1.00, 1.00 > Tasks: 56 total, 2 running, 54 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 96.0% id, 3.3% wa, 0.0% hi, > 0.0% si > Mem: 91476k total, 89220k used, 2256k free, 19024k buffers > Swap: 1572856k total, 548k used, 1572308k free, 18676k cached > > > Here are some details about the system. > > dom0 kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4xenU #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 21:25:28 > EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > > # cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 1 > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.70GHz > stepping : 3 > cpu MHz : 1694.498 > cache size : 128 KB > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : yes > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat > pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm > bogomips : 3381.65 > > > > In my experience, the previous Xen, running the 1398 FC4 Xen kernels did > not have this behavior? Any ideas on what can be done to get my ''real'' > load averages back? >You have an SMP kernel but are running what I am guessing is a UP Celeron. Ted _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I noticed this too, but I did not install any SMP kernel packages at all.
# rpm -qa | grep kernel | sort
kernel-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-devel-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
kernel-devel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-devel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4_lvm_md_fix.agoode
kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-xen0-devel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-xen0-devel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-xenU-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-xenU-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4_lvm_md_fix.agoode
kernel-xenU-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
And you might have noticed that I typod the kernel for dom0 in the
original post. Obviously, it is not a xenU kernel in dom0. But it does
still say SMP.
Linux 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4xen0 #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 21:13:28 EDT 2005 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 09:43 -0400, Michael J. Baysek wrote:
>
>
>>Since upgrading to the Fedora xen-2-20050823 and associated
>>kernel-xen0-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 packages , I am getting funny reading from
>>top, both on dom0 and domU. Basically, top is reading load of 1.00 when
>>machine is basically idle.
>>
>> top - 09:32:12 up 2 days, 22:52, 2 users, load average: 1.00,
>> 1.00, 1.00
>> Tasks: 56 total, 2 running, 54 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>> Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 96.0% id, 3.3% wa, 0.0% hi,
>> 0.0% si
>> Mem: 91476k total, 89220k used, 2256k free, 19024k
buffers
>> Swap: 1572856k total, 548k used, 1572308k free, 18676k
cached
>>
>>
>>Here are some details about the system.
>>
>> dom0 kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4xenU #1 SMP Fri Aug 26 21:25:28
>> EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>> # cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family : 15
>> model : 1
>> model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.70GHz
>> stepping : 3
>> cpu MHz : 1694.498
>> cache size : 128 KB
>> fdiv_bug : no
>> hlt_bug : yes
>> f00f_bug : no
>> coma_bug : no
>> fpu : yes
>> fpu_exception : yes
>> cpuid level : 2
>> wp : yes
>> flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat
>> pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
>> bogomips : 3381.65
>>
>>
>>
>>In my experience, the previous Xen, running the 1398 FC4 Xen kernels did
>>not have this behavior? Any ideas on what can be done to get my
''real''
>>load averages back?
>>
>>
>>
>You have an SMP kernel but are running what I am guessing is a UP
>Celeron.
>
>Ted
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-users mailing list
>Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
--
Mike Baysek
Systems Analyst
Auton Lab, NSH 3123
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Monday 12 September 2005 20:50, Michael J. Baysek wrote:> I noticed this too, but I did not install any SMP kernel packages at all.Could you check the output of "cat /proc/interrupts"? Maybe some interrupt is constantly firing, causing the high load? /Ernst _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On UML this problem is solved. http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ But I don´t know how xen works. here is the patch for uml http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.12-bs11/broken-out/patches/uml-load-ave-1.patch Itamar Reis Peixoto +55 (34) 3238 3845 e-mail : itamar@ispbrasil.com.br _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Does this look normal?
In dom0:
# uptime
16:09:06 up 3 days, 5:29, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
1: 8 Phys-irq i8042
8: 1 Phys-irq rtc
12: 101 Phys-irq i8042
14: 4749202 Phys-irq ide0
15: 2245884 Phys-irq ide1
18: 9925462 Phys-irq uhci_hcd:usb2, peth0
19: 0 Phys-irq uhci_hcd:usb1
256: 24 Dynamic-irq ctrl-if
257: 12848359 Dynamic-irq timer0
258: 0 Dynamic-irq console
259: 0 Dynamic-irq net-be-dbg
260: 6868 Dynamic-irq xenbus
261: 197255 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
262: 1134427 Dynamic-irq vif6.0
263: 297313 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
264: 1748710 Dynamic-irq vif5.0
265: 1032262 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
266: 3805480 Dynamic-irq vif4.0
267: 36943 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
268: 198732 Dynamic-irq vif8.0
NMI: 0
LOC: 0
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
In domU:
# uptime
16:09:59 up 2 days, 18:29, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.02, 1.00
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
256: 1194 Dynamic-irq ctrl-if
257: 6574362 Dynamic-irq timer0
258: 0 Dynamic-irq resched0
259: 0 Dynamic-irq callfunc0
260: 39 Dynamic-irq xenbus
261: 179092 Dynamic-irq blkif
262: 1051829 Dynamic-irq eth0
NMI: 0
ERR: 0
Ernst Bachmann wrote:
>On Monday 12 September 2005 20:50, Michael J. Baysek wrote:
>
>
>>I noticed this too, but I did not install any SMP kernel packages at
all.
>>
>>
>
>Could you check the output of "cat /proc/interrupts"?
>Maybe some interrupt is constantly firing, causing the high load?
>
>/Ernst
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-users mailing list
>Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
--
Mike Baysek
Systems Analyst
Auton Lab, NSH 3123
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Do the http://people.redhat.com/riel/ packages fix the load average problem? Also do they introduce any other problems? When I updated to the 1447 RPMs my domU I had running mailman stopped delivering mail in a timely way, and I had to move it back to user-mode-linux to get it running again. Michael J. Baysek wrote:> Does this look normal? > > In dom0: > > # uptime > 16:09:06 up 3 days, 5:29, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 > > # cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 > 1: 8 Phys-irq i8042 > 8: 1 Phys-irq rtc > 12: 101 Phys-irq i8042 > 14: 4749202 Phys-irq ide0 > 15: 2245884 Phys-irq ide1 > 18: 9925462 Phys-irq uhci_hcd:usb2, peth0 > 19: 0 Phys-irq uhci_hcd:usb1 > 256: 24 Dynamic-irq ctrl-if > 257: 12848359 Dynamic-irq timer0 > 258: 0 Dynamic-irq console > 259: 0 Dynamic-irq net-be-dbg > 260: 6868 Dynamic-irq xenbus > 261: 197255 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend > 262: 1134427 Dynamic-irq vif6.0 > 263: 297313 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend > 264: 1748710 Dynamic-irq vif5.0 > 265: 1032262 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend > 266: 3805480 Dynamic-irq vif4.0 > 267: 36943 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend > 268: 198732 Dynamic-irq vif8.0 > NMI: 0 > LOC: 0 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > In domU: > > # uptime > 16:09:59 up 2 days, 18:29, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.02, 1.00 > > # cat /proc/interrupts > > CPU0 > 256: 1194 Dynamic-irq ctrl-if > 257: 6574362 Dynamic-irq timer0 > 258: 0 Dynamic-irq resched0 > 259: 0 Dynamic-irq callfunc0 > 260: 39 Dynamic-irq xenbus > 261: 179092 Dynamic-irq blkif > 262: 1051829 Dynamic-irq eth0 > NMI: 0 > ERR: 0 > > > Ernst Bachmann wrote: > >> On Monday 12 September 2005 20:50, Michael J. Baysek wrote: >> >> >>> I noticed this too, but I did not install any SMP kernel packages at >>> all. >>> >> >> >> Could you check the output of "cat /proc/interrupts"? >> Maybe some interrupt is constantly firing, causing the high load? >> >> /Ernst >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> >> >> > >-- Mike Baysek Systems Analyst Auton Lab, NSH 3123 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users