Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2013-Dec-03 12:03 UTC
[PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64)
and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch.
Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1
size is 64b.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
---
xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 8 ++++++++
xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index 52d2403..74ab046 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -89,7 +89,11 @@ static void ctxt_switch_from(struct vcpu *p)
/* MMU */
p->arch.vbar = READ_SYSREG(VBAR_EL1);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
p->arch.ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1);
+#else
+ p->arch.ttbcr = READ_SYSREG64(TCR_EL1);
+#endif
p->arch.ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1);
p->arch.ttbr1 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR1_EL1);
if ( is_pv32_domain(p->domain) )
@@ -168,7 +172,11 @@ static void ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *n)
/* MMU */
WRITE_SYSREG(n->arch.vbar, VBAR_EL1);
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_32)
WRITE_SYSREG(n->arch.ttbcr, TCR_EL1);
+#else
+ WRITE_SYSREG64(n->arch.ttbcr, TCR_EL1);
+#endif
WRITE_SYSREG64(n->arch.ttbr0, TTBR0_EL1);
WRITE_SYSREG64(n->arch.ttbr1, TTBR1_EL1);
if ( is_pv32_domain(n->domain) )
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
@@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu
/* MMU */
register_t vbar;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
uint32_t ttbcr;
+#else
+ uint64_t ttbcr;
+#endif
uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1;
uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */
--
1.7.9.5
Ian Campbell
2013-Dec-03 13:47 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 17:33 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:> This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64) > and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch. > > Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1 > size is 64b.Thanks for tracking this down.> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>[...]> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu > > /* MMU */ > register_t vbar; > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 > uint32_t ttbcr; > +#else > + uint64_t ttbcr; > +#endifI think that actually only this hunk is required. Actually, the correct type to use is register_t (which is defined to be the "native" register size, 32- or 64-bit as appropriate). That avoids the ifdef. The READ/WRITE_SYSREG macros are also defined to deal in the "native" bit width so the other hunks are unnecessary. The SYSREG32/64 variants are for use with a register which is a fixed width independent of the platform. Thanks, Ian.
Ian Campbell
2013-Dec-03 15:40 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 13:47 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 17:33 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote: > > This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64) > > and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch. > > > > Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1 > > size is 64b. > > Thanks for tracking this down. > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> > [...] > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > > index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > > @@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu > > > > /* MMU */ > > register_t vbar; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 > > uint32_t ttbcr; > > +#else > > + uint64_t ttbcr; > > +#endif > > I think that actually only this hunk is required.Actually, it turns out there a few other places where ttbcr is incorrectly stored in a 32-bit variable. Including one which needed some careful consideration before it was safe to change. Here is what I came up with. -------------8<--------------- From 832544695c39a7d3f98e73381010eaab491982cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:13:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: TCR_EL1 is 64-bit on arm64 Storing it in a 32-bit variable in struct arch_vcpu caused breakage over context switch. There were also several other places which stored this as the 32-bit value. Update them all. The "struct vcpu_guest_context" case needs special consideration. This struct is in theory is exposed to guests, via the VCPUOP_initialise hypercall. However as discussed in http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-10/msg00912.html this isn''t really a guest visible interface since ARM uses PSCI for VCPU bringup (VCPUOP_initialise simply isn''t available) The other users of this interface are the domctls, which are not a stable API. Therefore while fixing the ttbcr size also surround the struct in ifdefs to restrict the struct to the hypervisor and the tools only (omitting the extra complexity of renaming as I suggested in the referenced thread) NB TCR_EL1 on arm64 is known as TTBCR on arm32, hence the apparent naming inconsistencies. Spotted-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> Cc: patches@linaro.org Cc: patches@apm.com --- xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 11 ++++++----- xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 +- xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c index 53eb0cf..b2725df 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static void inject_undef64_exception(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int instr_len) struct reg_ctxt { /* Guest-side state */ - uint32_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1; + uint32_t sctlr_el1; + register_t tcr_el1; uint64_t ttbr0_el1, ttbr1_el1; #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 uint32_t dfsr, ifsr; @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void show_registers_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, if ( guest_mode ) { printk(" SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); - printk(" TCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); + printk(" TCR: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); printk(" TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); printk(" TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); printk(" IFAR: %08"PRIx32", IFSR: %08"PRIx32"\n" @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static void show_registers_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, printk(" FAR_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->far); printk("\n"); printk(" SCTLR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); - printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); + printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); printk(" TTBR0_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); printk(" TTBR1_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); printk("\n"); @@ -1261,14 +1262,14 @@ static void do_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, void dump_guest_s1_walk(struct domain *d, vaddr_t addr) { - uint32_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG32(TCR_EL1); + register_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1); uint64_t ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1); paddr_t paddr; uint32_t offset; uint32_t *first = NULL, *second = NULL; printk("dom%d VA 0x%08"PRIvaddr"\n", d->domain_id, addr); - printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", ttbcr); + printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIregister"\n", ttbcr); printk(" TTBR0: 0x%016"PRIx64" = 0x%"PRIpaddr"\n", ttbr0, p2m_lookup(d, ttbr0 & PAGE_MASK)); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h index d5cae2e..8ebee3e 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu /* MMU */ register_t vbar; - uint32_t ttbcr; + register_t ttbcr; uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h index cb41ddc..475cb4a 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; typedef uint64_t xen_ulong_t; #define PRI_xen_ulong PRIx64 +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) struct vcpu_guest_context { #define _VGCF_online 0 #define VGCF_online (1<<_VGCF_online) @@ -285,11 +286,12 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { struct vcpu_guest_core_regs user_regs; /* Core CPU registers */ - uint32_t sctlr, ttbcr; - uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; + uint32_t sctlr; + uint64_t ttbcr, ttbr0, ttbr1; }; typedef struct vcpu_guest_context vcpu_guest_context_t; DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_context_t); +#endif struct arch_vcpu_info { }; -- 1.7.10.4
Julien Grall
2013-Dec-03 16:09 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On 12/03/2013 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 13:47 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 17:33 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote: >>> This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64) >>> and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch. >>> >>> Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1 >>> size is 64b. >> >> Thanks for tracking this down. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> >> [...] >>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>> index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644 >>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>> @@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu >>> >>> /* MMU */ >>> register_t vbar; >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 >>> uint32_t ttbcr; >>> +#else >>> + uint64_t ttbcr; >>> +#endif >> >> I think that actually only this hunk is required. > > Actually, it turns out there a few other places where ttbcr is > incorrectly stored in a 32-bit variable. Including one which needed some > careful consideration before it was safe to change. Here is what I came > up with. > > -------------8<--------------- > > From 832544695c39a7d3f98e73381010eaab491982cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:13:36 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: TCR_EL1 is 64-bit on arm64 > > Storing it in a 32-bit variable in struct arch_vcpu caused breakage over > context switch. > > There were also several other places which stored this as the 32-bit value. > Update them all. > > The "struct vcpu_guest_context" case needs special consideration. This struct > is in theory is exposed to guests, via the VCPUOP_initialise hypercall. > However as discussed in > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-10/msg00912.html this isn''t > really a guest visible interface since ARM uses PSCI for VCPU bringup > (VCPUOP_initialise simply isn''t available) The other users of this interface > are the domctls, which are not a stable API. Therefore while fixing the ttbcr > size also surround the struct in ifdefs to restrict the struct to the > hypervisor and the tools only (omitting the extra complexity of renaming as I > suggested in the referenced thread) > > NB TCR_EL1 on arm64 is known as TTBCR on arm32, hence the apparent naming > inconsistencies. > > Spotted-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> > Cc: patches@linaro.org > Cc: patches@apm.comAcked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>> --- > xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 11 ++++++----- > xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 +- > xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 6 ++++-- > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > index 53eb0cf..b2725df 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static void inject_undef64_exception(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int instr_len) > > struct reg_ctxt { > /* Guest-side state */ > - uint32_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1; > + uint32_t sctlr_el1; > + register_t tcr_el1; > uint64_t ttbr0_el1, ttbr1_el1; > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 > uint32_t dfsr, ifsr; > @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void show_registers_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > if ( guest_mode ) > { > printk(" SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); > - printk(" TCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > + printk(" TCR: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > printk(" TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); > printk(" TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); > printk(" IFAR: %08"PRIx32", IFSR: %08"PRIx32"\n" > @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static void show_registers_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > printk(" FAR_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->far); > printk("\n"); > printk(" SCTLR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); > - printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > + printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > printk(" TTBR0_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); > printk(" TTBR1_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); > printk("\n"); > @@ -1261,14 +1262,14 @@ static void do_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > > void dump_guest_s1_walk(struct domain *d, vaddr_t addr) > { > - uint32_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG32(TCR_EL1); > + register_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1); > uint64_t ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1); > paddr_t paddr; > uint32_t offset; > uint32_t *first = NULL, *second = NULL; > > printk("dom%d VA 0x%08"PRIvaddr"\n", d->domain_id, addr); > - printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", ttbcr); > + printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIregister"\n", ttbcr); > printk(" TTBR0: 0x%016"PRIx64" = 0x%"PRIpaddr"\n", > ttbr0, p2m_lookup(d, ttbr0 & PAGE_MASK)); > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > index d5cae2e..8ebee3e 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu > > /* MMU */ > register_t vbar; > - uint32_t ttbcr; > + register_t ttbcr; > uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; > > uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ > diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > index cb41ddc..475cb4a 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; > typedef uint64_t xen_ulong_t; > #define PRI_xen_ulong PRIx64 > > +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) > struct vcpu_guest_context { > #define _VGCF_online 0 > #define VGCF_online (1<<_VGCF_online) > @@ -285,11 +286,12 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { > > struct vcpu_guest_core_regs user_regs; /* Core CPU registers */ > > - uint32_t sctlr, ttbcr; > - uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; > + uint32_t sctlr; > + uint64_t ttbcr, ttbr0, ttbr1; > }; > typedef struct vcpu_guest_context vcpu_guest_context_t; > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_context_t); > +#endif > > struct arch_vcpu_info { > }; >-- Julien Grall
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2013-Dec-03 16:20 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On 3 December 2013 21:39, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> wrote:> On 12/03/2013 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 13:47 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 17:33 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote: >>>> This patch fixes size of ttbcr register (TCR_EL1 in case of AArch64) >>>> and it''s programming considering size in case of context switch. >>>> >>>> Currently ttbcr is defined as 32b register but for AArch64 TCR_EL1 >>>> size is 64b. >>> >>> Thanks for tracking this down. >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> >>> [...] >>>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>> index d5cae2e..2aa4443 100644 >>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >>>> @@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct arch_vcpu >>>> >>>> /* MMU */ >>>> register_t vbar; >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 >>>> uint32_t ttbcr; >>>> +#else >>>> + uint64_t ttbcr; >>>> +#endif >>> >>> I think that actually only this hunk is required. >> >> Actually, it turns out there a few other places where ttbcr is >> incorrectly stored in a 32-bit variable. Including one which needed some >> careful consideration before it was safe to change. Here is what I came >> up with. >> >> -------------8<--------------- >> >> From 832544695c39a7d3f98e73381010eaab491982cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> >> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:13:36 +0000 >> Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: TCR_EL1 is 64-bit on arm64 >> >> Storing it in a 32-bit variable in struct arch_vcpu caused breakage over >> context switch. >> >> There were also several other places which stored this as the 32-bit value. >> Update them all. >> >> The "struct vcpu_guest_context" case needs special consideration. This struct >> is in theory is exposed to guests, via the VCPUOP_initialise hypercall. >> However as discussed in >> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-10/msg00912.html this isn''t >> really a guest visible interface since ARM uses PSCI for VCPU bringup >> (VCPUOP_initialise simply isn''t available) The other users of this interface >> are the domctls, which are not a stable API. Therefore while fixing the ttbcr >> size also surround the struct in ifdefs to restrict the struct to the >> hypervisor and the tools only (omitting the extra complexity of renaming as I >> suggested in the referenced thread) >> >> NB TCR_EL1 on arm64 is known as TTBCR on arm32, hence the apparent naming >> inconsistencies. >> >> Spotted-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> >> Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> >> Cc: patches@linaro.org >> Cc: patches@apm.com > > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 11 ++++++----- >> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 +- >> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 6 ++++-- >> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >> index 53eb0cf..b2725df 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >> @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static void inject_undef64_exception(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int instr_len) >> >> struct reg_ctxt { >> /* Guest-side state */ >> - uint32_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1; >> + uint32_t sctlr_el1; >> + register_t tcr_el1; >> uint64_t ttbr0_el1, ttbr1_el1; >> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 >> uint32_t dfsr, ifsr; >> @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void show_registers_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, >> if ( guest_mode ) >> { >> printk(" SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); >> - printk(" TCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); >> + printk(" TCR: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); >> printk(" TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); >> printk(" TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); >> printk(" IFAR: %08"PRIx32", IFSR: %08"PRIx32"\n" >> @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static void show_registers_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, >> printk(" FAR_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->far); >> printk("\n"); >> printk(" SCTLR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); >> - printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); >> + printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); >> printk(" TTBR0_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); >> printk(" TTBR1_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); >> printk("\n"); >> @@ -1261,14 +1262,14 @@ static void do_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, >> >> void dump_guest_s1_walk(struct domain *d, vaddr_t addr) >> { >> - uint32_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG32(TCR_EL1); >> + register_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1); >> uint64_t ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1); >> paddr_t paddr; >> uint32_t offset; >> uint32_t *first = NULL, *second = NULL; >> >> printk("dom%d VA 0x%08"PRIvaddr"\n", d->domain_id, addr); >> - printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", ttbcr); >> + printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIregister"\n", ttbcr); >> printk(" TTBR0: 0x%016"PRIx64" = 0x%"PRIpaddr"\n", >> ttbr0, p2m_lookup(d, ttbr0 & PAGE_MASK)); >> >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >> index d5cae2e..8ebee3e 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu >> >> /* MMU */ >> register_t vbar; >> - uint32_t ttbcr; >> + register_t ttbcr; >> uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; >> >> uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ >> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> index cb41ddc..475cb4a 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h >> @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; >> typedef uint64_t xen_ulong_t; >> #define PRI_xen_ulong PRIx64 >> >> +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) >> struct vcpu_guest_context { >> #define _VGCF_online 0 >> #define VGCF_online (1<<_VGCF_online) >> @@ -285,11 +286,12 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { >> >> struct vcpu_guest_core_regs user_regs; /* Core CPU registers */ >> >> - uint32_t sctlr, ttbcr; >> - uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; >> + uint32_t sctlr; >> + uint64_t ttbcr, ttbr0, ttbr1; >> }; >> typedef struct vcpu_guest_context vcpu_guest_context_t; >> DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_context_t); >> +#endif >> >> struct arch_vcpu_info { >> }; >> > > > -- > Julien GrallThanks for spotting other changes. Patch looks good for me. Thanks, Pranav
Ian Campbell
2013-Dec-03 17:27 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:50 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>> Thanks for spotting other changes. > Patch looks good for me.Thanks. May I translate that into an Acked-by? Actually my 64-bit userspace build test wasn''t actually building (just installing, oops!) so I missed out updating ./tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size and xenctx. v2 below. -------8<----------------- From f49eae50daf4c6be11abbb43c2a74e3643798044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:13:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: TCR_EL1 is 64-bit on arm64 Storing it in a 32-bit variable in struct arch_vcpu caused breakage over context switch. There were also several other places which stored this as the 32-bit value. Update them all. The "struct vcpu_guest_context" case needs special consideration. This struct is in theory is exposed to guests, via the VCPUOP_initialise hypercall. However as discussed in http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-10/msg00912.html this isn''t really a guest visible interface since ARM uses PSCI for VCPU bringup (VCPUOP_initialise simply isn''t available) The other users of this interface are the domctls, which are not a stable API. Therefore while fixing the ttbcr size also surround the struct in ifdefs to restrict the struct to the hypervisor and the tools only (omitting the extra complexity of renaming as I suggested in the referenced thread). NB TCR_EL1 on arm64 is known as TTBCR on arm32, hence the apparent naming inconsistencies. Spotted-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> Cc: patches@linaro.org Cc: patches@apm.com --- v2: Update foreign header reference sizes, fix xenctx. --- tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size | 2 +- tools/xentrace/xenctx.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 11 ++++++----- xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 +- xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 6 ++++-- 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size b/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size index b3347b4..60ee262 100644 --- a/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size +++ b/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ start_info | - - 1112 1168 trap_info | - - 8 16 cpu_user_regs | - - 68 200 vcpu_guest_core_regs | 304 304 - - -vcpu_guest_context | 336 336 2800 5168 +vcpu_guest_context | 344 344 2800 5168 arch_vcpu_info | 0 0 24 16 vcpu_time_info | 32 32 32 32 vcpu_info | 48 48 64 64 diff --git a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c index ba502fd..7275a00 100644 --- a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c +++ b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void print_ctx(vcpu_guest_context_any_t *ctx_any) #endif printf("SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctx->sctlr); - printf("TTBCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctx->ttbcr); + printf("TTBCR: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbcr); printf("TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbr0); printf("TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbr1); } diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c index 8144b2b..458128e 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static void inject_undef64_exception(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int instr_len) struct reg_ctxt { /* Guest-side state */ - uint32_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1; + uint32_t sctlr_el1; + register_t tcr_el1; uint64_t ttbr0_el1, ttbr1_el1; #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 uint32_t dfsr, ifsr; @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void show_registers_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, if ( guest_mode ) { printk(" SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); - printk(" TCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); + printk(" TCR: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); printk(" TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); printk(" TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); printk(" IFAR: %08"PRIx32", IFSR: %08"PRIx32"\n" @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static void show_registers_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, printk(" FAR_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->far); printk("\n"); printk(" SCTLR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); - printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); + printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); printk(" TTBR0_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); printk(" TTBR1_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); printk("\n"); @@ -1257,14 +1258,14 @@ static void do_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, void dump_guest_s1_walk(struct domain *d, vaddr_t addr) { - uint32_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG32(TCR_EL1); + register_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1); uint64_t ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1); paddr_t paddr; uint32_t offset; uint32_t *first = NULL, *second = NULL; printk("dom%d VA 0x%08"PRIvaddr"\n", d->domain_id, addr); - printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", ttbcr); + printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIregister"\n", ttbcr); printk(" TTBR0: 0x%016"PRIx64" = 0x%"PRIpaddr"\n", ttbr0, p2m_lookup(d, ttbr0 & PAGE_MASK)); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h index d5cae2e..8ebee3e 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu /* MMU */ register_t vbar; - uint32_t ttbcr; + register_t ttbcr; uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h index cb41ddc..475cb4a 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; typedef uint64_t xen_ulong_t; #define PRI_xen_ulong PRIx64 +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) struct vcpu_guest_context { #define _VGCF_online 0 #define VGCF_online (1<<_VGCF_online) @@ -285,11 +286,12 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { struct vcpu_guest_core_regs user_regs; /* Core CPU registers */ - uint32_t sctlr, ttbcr; - uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; + uint32_t sctlr; + uint64_t ttbcr, ttbr0, ttbr1; }; typedef struct vcpu_guest_context vcpu_guest_context_t; DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_context_t); +#endif struct arch_vcpu_info { }; -- 1.7.10.4
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2013-Dec-03 17:44 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:50 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote: >> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > >> Thanks for spotting other changes. >> Patch looks good for me. > > Thanks. May I translate that into an Acked-by?Yes, i missed adding acked by in last mail :) Acked-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>> > Actually my 64-bit userspace build test wasn''t actually building (just > installing, oops!) so I missed out > updating ./tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size and xenctx. v2 > below. > > -------8<----------------- > > From f49eae50daf4c6be11abbb43c2a74e3643798044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:13:36 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: TCR_EL1 is 64-bit on arm64 > > Storing it in a 32-bit variable in struct arch_vcpu caused breakage over > context switch. > > There were also several other places which stored this as the 32-bit value. > Update them all. > > The "struct vcpu_guest_context" case needs special consideration. This struct > is in theory is exposed to guests, via the VCPUOP_initialise hypercall. > However as discussed in > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-10/msg00912.html this isn''t > really a guest visible interface since ARM uses PSCI for VCPU bringup > (VCPUOP_initialise simply isn''t available) The other users of this interface > are the domctls, which are not a stable API. Therefore while fixing the ttbcr > size also surround the struct in ifdefs to restrict the struct to the > hypervisor and the tools only (omitting the extra complexity of renaming as I > suggested in the referenced thread). > > NB TCR_EL1 on arm64 is known as TTBCR on arm32, hence the apparent naming > inconsistencies. > > Spotted-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org> > Cc: patches@linaro.org > Cc: patches@apm.com > --- > v2: Update foreign header reference sizes, fix xenctx. > --- > tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size | 2 +- > tools/xentrace/xenctx.c | 2 +- > xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 11 ++++++----- > xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 2 +- > xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 6 ++++-- > 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size b/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size > index b3347b4..60ee262 100644 > --- a/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size > +++ b/tools/include/xen-foreign/reference.size > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ start_info | - - 1112 1168 > trap_info | - - 8 16 > cpu_user_regs | - - 68 200 > vcpu_guest_core_regs | 304 304 - - > -vcpu_guest_context | 336 336 2800 5168 > +vcpu_guest_context | 344 344 2800 5168 > arch_vcpu_info | 0 0 24 16 > vcpu_time_info | 32 32 32 32 > vcpu_info | 48 48 64 64 > diff --git a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c > index ba502fd..7275a00 100644 > --- a/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c > +++ b/tools/xentrace/xenctx.c > @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void print_ctx(vcpu_guest_context_any_t *ctx_any) > #endif > > printf("SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctx->sctlr); > - printf("TTBCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctx->ttbcr); > + printf("TTBCR: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbcr); > printf("TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbr0); > printf("TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctx->ttbr1); > } > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > index 8144b2b..458128e 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c > @@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static void inject_undef64_exception(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int instr_len) > > struct reg_ctxt { > /* Guest-side state */ > - uint32_t sctlr_el1, tcr_el1; > + uint32_t sctlr_el1; > + register_t tcr_el1; > uint64_t ttbr0_el1, ttbr1_el1; > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32 > uint32_t dfsr, ifsr; > @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void show_registers_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > if ( guest_mode ) > { > printk(" SCTLR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); > - printk(" TCR: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > + printk(" TCR: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > printk(" TTBR0: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); > printk(" TTBR1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); > printk(" IFAR: %08"PRIx32", IFSR: %08"PRIx32"\n" > @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static void show_registers_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > printk(" FAR_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->far); > printk("\n"); > printk(" SCTLR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->sctlr_el1); > - printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIx32"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > + printk(" TCR_EL1: %08"PRIregister"\n", ctxt->tcr_el1); > printk(" TTBR0_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr0_el1); > printk(" TTBR1_EL1: %016"PRIx64"\n", ctxt->ttbr1_el1); > printk("\n"); > @@ -1257,14 +1258,14 @@ static void do_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > > void dump_guest_s1_walk(struct domain *d, vaddr_t addr) > { > - uint32_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG32(TCR_EL1); > + register_t ttbcr = READ_SYSREG(TCR_EL1); > uint64_t ttbr0 = READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL1); > paddr_t paddr; > uint32_t offset; > uint32_t *first = NULL, *second = NULL; > > printk("dom%d VA 0x%08"PRIvaddr"\n", d->domain_id, addr); > - printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", ttbcr); > + printk(" TTBCR: 0x%08"PRIregister"\n", ttbcr); > printk(" TTBR0: 0x%016"PRIx64" = 0x%"PRIpaddr"\n", > ttbr0, p2m_lookup(d, ttbr0 & PAGE_MASK)); > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > index d5cae2e..8ebee3e 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu > > /* MMU */ > register_t vbar; > - uint32_t ttbcr; > + register_t ttbcr; > uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; > > uint32_t dacr; /* 32-bit guests only */ > diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > index cb41ddc..475cb4a 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; > typedef uint64_t xen_ulong_t; > #define PRI_xen_ulong PRIx64 > > +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__) > struct vcpu_guest_context { > #define _VGCF_online 0 > #define VGCF_online (1<<_VGCF_online) > @@ -285,11 +286,12 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { > > struct vcpu_guest_core_regs user_regs; /* Core CPU registers */ > > - uint32_t sctlr, ttbcr; > - uint64_t ttbr0, ttbr1; > + uint32_t sctlr; > + uint64_t ttbcr, ttbr0, ttbr1; > }; > typedef struct vcpu_guest_context vcpu_guest_context_t; > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_context_t); > +#endif > > struct arch_vcpu_info { > }; > -- > 1.7.10.4 > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information > that is confidential and proprietary to Applied Micro Circuits Corporation or its subsidiaries. > It is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the parties'' business relationship. > All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail > and destroy all copies of the original message. >- Pranav
Ian Campbell
2013-Dec-04 14:52 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Fixing ttbcr (TCR_EL1 for AArch64) size.
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 23:14 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:50 +0530, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote: > >> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > > > >> Thanks for spotting other changes. > >> Patch looks good for me. > > > > Thanks. May I translate that into an Acked-by? > Yes, i missed adding acked by in last mail :) > Acked-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>Applied, thanks!
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH v3 00/46] initial arm v8 (64-bit) support
- [PATCH 00/45] initial arm v8 (64-bit) support
- [PATCH v2 02/15] xen: arm64: Add Basic Platform support for APM X-Gene Storm.
- [PATCH+RFC+HACK 00/16] xen: arm initial support for xgene arm64 platform
- [PATCH v2 00/14] xen: arm: 64-bit guest support and domU FDT autogeneration