Xen devel - Oct 2006 - double invoke of hvm_do_resume

Keir:
	Not sure from when, at least now hvm_do_resume is double invoked
in both 1: arch_vmx_do_resume from schedule_tail, and 2)
vmx_asm_do_vmentry of ASM code for both x86 32 & 64 bits. I am wondering
if the #1 is a redundant, can u have a double check?
thx,eddie


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 24/10/06 14:58, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> wrote:
> Keir: 
>         Not sure from when, at least now hvm_do_resume is double invoked in
> both 1: arch_vmx_do_resume from schedule_tail, and 2) vmx_asm_do_vmentry of
> ASM code for both x86 32 & 64 bits. I am wondering if the #1 is a
redundant,
> can u have a double check?
> 
> thx,eddie 
> 
#2 was redundant. It¹s gone from xen-unstable already.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Yes, thanks!
Eddie

________________________________

From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk] 
Sent: 2006年10月24日 23:38
To: Dong, Eddie
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: double invoke of hvm_do_resume





On 24/10/06 14:58, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> wrote:



	Keir: 
	        Not sure from when, at least now hvm_do_resume is double invoked in
both 1: arch_vmx_do_resume from schedule_tail, and 2) vmx_asm_do_vmentry of ASM
code for both x86 32 & 64 bits. I am wondering if the #1 is a redundant, can
u have a double check?
	
	thx,eddie 
	
	

#2 was redundant. It’s gone from xen-unstable already.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel