I keep getting the following errors on different machines (x86_32 and
x86_64). Hg version is 0.6c.
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hg", line 13, in ?
commands.run()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/commands.py",
line
1461, in run
sys.exit(dispatch(sys.argv[1:]))
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/commands.py",
line
1571, in dispatch
return d()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/commands.py",
line
1556, in <lambda>
d = lambda: func(u, repo, *args, **cmdoptions)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/commands.py",
line
938, in pull
r = repo.pull(other)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/hg.py", line
1404,
in pull
return self.addchangegroup(cg)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/hg.py", line
1526,
in addchangegroup
n = fl.addgroup(getgroup(), revmap, tr)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/mercurial/revlog.py", line
517, in addgroup
raise "unknown base %s" % short(chain[:4])
unknown base 4ff10995
transaction abort!
rollback completed
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 08/09/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote:> I keep getting the following errors on different machines (x86_32 and > x86_64). Hg version is 0.6c.Were you trying to use a seed archive? I kept getting errors using the unstable seed tarballs. A ''hg pull'' of the whole repository worked fine. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Chris Bainbridge wrote:> On 08/09/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote: >> I keep getting the following errors on different machines (x86_32 and >> x86_64). Hg version is 0.6c. > > Were you trying to use a seed archive? I kept getting errors using the > unstable seed tarballs. A ''hg pull'' of the whole repository worked > fine. >Actually I tried two things, a seed archive and the local tree I was using, which used to be working until today. Anyway, it worked fine if I pull the whole repository. Thanks. Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> On 08/09/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote: > > I keep getting the following errors on different machines > (x86_32 and > > x86_64). Hg version is 0.6c. > > Were you trying to use a seed archive? I kept getting errors > using the unstable seed tarballs. A ''hg pull'' of the whole > repository worked fine.Yes, the seed repositories only work with 0.6b due to the directory name ''init.d'' issue. We either need to update them or delete them. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Pratt wrote:>> On 08/09/05, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote: >>> I keep getting the following errors on different machines (x86_32 >>> and x86_64). Hg version is 0.6c. >> >> Were you trying to use a seed archive? I kept getting errors >> using the unstable seed tarballs. A ''hg pull'' of the whole >> repository worked fine. > > Yes, the seed repositories only work with 0.6b due to the directory > name ''init.d'' issue. We either need to update them or delete them. > > Ian >I always ran the James''s script, but I got the error. Anyway I think we should update the seed archive. With the current seed archive, we don''t save network traffic significantly because a number of changes have been made since then ;-). Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel