I get this kind of a report on boot: Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones agpgart: Detected SiS 651 chipset agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 691M agpgart: unable to get memory for graphics translation table. agpgart: agp_backend_initialize() failed. agpgart-sis: probe of 0000:00:00.0 failed with error -12 Upon starting X, I get this in xen dmesg: (XEN) mtrr: no more MTRRs available (XEN) mtrr: no more MTRRs available My /proc/mtrr looks like: reg00: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=0 reg01: base=0xd0000000 (3328MB), size= 128MB: write-combining, count=0 reg02: base=0xffff80000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 reg03: base=0xffff82000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 reg04: base=0xffff84000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 reg05: base=0xffff86000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 reg06: base=0xffff88000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 reg07: base=0xffff8a000 (65535MB), size= 4KB: uncachable, count=0 So, where to start looking first? -- Naked ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones > agpgart: Detected SiS 651 chipset > agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 691M > agpgart: unable to get memory for graphics translation table.Are you running 2.0-testing with the agp.patch? Ian ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
Ian Pratt wrote:>> Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones >> agpgart: Detected SiS 651 chipset >> agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 691M >> agpgart: unable to get memory for graphics translation table. > > Are you running 2.0-testing with the agp.patch?No, this is 2.0.4 (the debian packages) with the agp.patch from 2.0.4. Are there important advances in this area in 2.0-testing compared to 2.0.4? -- Naked ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nuutti Kotivuori [mailto:naked@iki.fi] > No, this is 2.0.4 (the debian packages) with the agp.patch from > 2.0.4. Are there important advances in this area in 2.0-testing > compared to 2.0.4?I don''t think this made it into 2.0.4: http://xen.bkbits.net:8080/xen-2.0-testing.bk/cset@1.1720?nav=index.html |ChangeSet@-7d Ian ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
Ian Pratt wrote:> From: Nuutti Kotivuori [mailto:naked@iki.fi] >> No, this is 2.0.4 (the debian packages) with the agp.patch from >> 2.0.4. Are there important advances in this area in 2.0-testing >> compared to 2.0.4? > > I don''t think this made it into 2.0.4: > > http://xen.bkbits.net:8080/xen-2.0-testing.bk/cset@1.1720?nav=index.html > |ChangeSet@-7dI will try Debian packages (including kernel patch) updated to 2.0-testing soon. However, the machine with that chipset is at work and I do most of my Xen testing at home for now. -- Naked ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel