wine users - Feb 2010 - winehq mailing list silently reject my emails?

Following the GitWine guide, I sent a 6k e-mail to wine-patches at winehq.org
and it didn't appear in the archive. But more recent letters are already
there. No errors returned.
I'm not subscribed to wine-patches, only to wine-devel. 
Last month I sent to wine-devel, and I thought that simply no one replied. But
it also didn't appear in the archive (I mean
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/ )

What could be the reason? Never sent any patches before. 

 
Code:
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:37:17 +0300
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX at gmail.com
X-Mailer: Voyager (v3.99.4) Professional
Reply-To: wine-devel <wine-devel at winehq.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <191934556.20100211173717 at gmail.com>
To: wine-patches <wine-patches at winehq.org>
Subject: [PATCH] shell32/tests: add tests for the parser of
SHELLEXECUTEINFO.lpFile (resend)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi!...

If you aren't subscribed to the list your patch awaits moderation.

James McKenzie wrote:
> Thunderbird wrote:
> 
> > If you aren't subscribed to the list your patch awaits moderation.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> If you are not subscribed to the list, your patch is REJECTED.  There is
> NO moderation.  You have to subscribe to submit patches.  It would be
> BEST to send your patch, for comments to the Wine Development list
> (after subscribing) before submission.  This way you can discover how
> things are done before getting 'blasted'.
> 
> James McKenzie

This is not true, wine-patches is moderated by a few people, me included. 
It's possible that it was mistakenly discarded it with the spam that is also
sent.  I am quite careful to check each mail before discarding it though.

My message was list the next day and I already got 1 reply. jeffz do you
moderate e-mails from subscribed?

leniviy wrote:
> My message was list the next day and I already got 1 reply. jeffz do you
moderate e-mails from subscribed?

Subscribers have their emails posted without moderation, but I think the only
exception is for very large mails, but they are not very common.

jeffz wrote:
> leniviy wrote:
>   
>> My message was list the next day and I already got 1 reply. jeffz do
you moderate e-mails from subscribed?
>>     
>
>
> Subscribers have their emails posted without moderation, but I think the
only exception is for very large mails, but they are not very common.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   
Jeffz:

The list information needs to be updated on Wine HQ then.  It states
that you must be subscribed to post.  That and Wine-Devel as well.  This
is the only open list for Wine.

James McKenzie

James McKenzie wrote:
> jeffz wrote:
> 
> > leniviy wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > My message was list the next day and I already got 1 reply. jeffz
do you moderate e-mails from subscribed?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Subscribers have their emails posted without moderation, but I think
the only exception is for very large mails, but they are not very common.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> Jeffz:
> 
> The list information needs to be updated on Wine HQ then.  It states
> that you must be subscribed to post.  That and Wine-Devel as well.  This
> is the only open list for Wine.
> 
> James McKenzie


Well, you do need to be subscribed to post, we don't very well want everyone
to not subscribe or we'd be spending all our time moderating queued mail.

The situation stays the same, everyone should subscribe who intends to post. 
The moderation is just there to catch any one-offs that people send through.