too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!
stimpak wrote:> too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing!They are slowly being closed as abandoned if no one replies for over 6 months with the current status.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote:> too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing! > > > > > >Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones to verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones. I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs: http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565 In short: Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6. Look at these bugs: http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Wine&keywords=download&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=days_elapsed&type0-0-0=greaterthan&value0-0-0=180 Test in a clean WINEPREFIX. Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other bug/busted download link/etc. -- -Austin
Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> at Oct 21, 2008 8:16 AM wrote about Re: [Wine] Bugzilla comment> >On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote: >> too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing! >> >> >> >> >> >> > >Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones to >verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones. > >I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got >time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs: >http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565 > >In short: >Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6. >Look at these bugs: >http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Wine&keywords=download&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=days_elapsed&type0-0-0=greaterthan&value0-0-0=180 >Test in a clean WINEPREFIX. >Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other >bug/busted download link/etc.Austin: Would you also like confirmation/denial on Darwine or would you rather these be confirmed only on Linux? James McKenzie