Well, this question comes once and again.
I have RC3 and Garf's RC2 tuned versions (160 and 350) in a nice graph.
Nobody should be surprised that RC3 is better, but in some cases GRC2 shows
better EAQUAL/bitrate results. There seems to be room for improvement in RC3
with some tweaking.
See it by yourself at
http://audio.sinderman.com/
Cheers, AGS.
<p>P.S. do not abuse the dynamic graph generator. If overloaded the
machine will
switch to a static page.
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:14:46AM +0100, AGS wrote:> > Well, this question comes once and again. > > I have RC3 and Garf's RC2 tuned versions (160 and 350) in a nice graph. > Nobody should be surprised that RC3 is better, but in some cases GRC2 shows > better EAQUAL/bitrate results. There seems to be room for improvement in RC3 > with some tweaking. > > See it by yourself at > > http://audio.sinderman.com/This page does not seem to exist; it refers to ebay.sinderman.ddts.net which does not exist. Roland -- --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:14:46AM +0100, AGS wrote:> > Well, this question comes once and again. > > I have RC3 and Garf's RC2 tuned versions (160 and 350) in a nice graph. > Nobody should be surprised that RC3 is better, but in some cases GRC2 shows > better EAQUAL/bitrate results. There seems to be room for improvement in RC3 > with some tweaking.EAQUAL is not a reliable test of anything, really. It's model is considerably less sophisticated than the psychoacoustics in Vorbis. Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> EAQUAL is not a reliable test of anything, really. It's model is > considerably less sophisticated than the psychoacoustics in Vorbis. > > MontyGood to know. Being EAQUAL not a reliable test of anything, or at least anything related to Ogg Vorbis, and being the purpose of those pages to test this encoder, I proceed to discontinue them and add the above quotation at the entrance page. Cheers, AGS. <p><p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.