Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "grc2".
Did you mean:
gcc2
2002 Jan 30
3
RC2 better than RC3? Graphed!
Well, this question comes once and again.
I have RC3 and Garf's RC2 tuned versions (160 and 350) in a nice graph.
Nobody should be surprised that RC3 is better, but in some cases GRC2 shows
better EAQUAL/bitrate results. There seems to be room for improvement in RC3
with some tweaking.
See it by yourself at
http://audio.sinderman.com/
Cheers, AGS.
<p>P.S. do not abuse the dynamic graph generator. If overloaded the machine will
sw...
2003 Apr 11
1
Pearson's Chi-squared Test
...-----+---------+--------+-------------+
Total 42 14 28 84
if i do:
y<- matrix(c(5,6,16, 19,7,6,7,2,5,10,0,1), nc=3)
and
chisq.test(y) i found that X-squared=20.3176 but the true value is 15.075
(http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/Courses/grcat/grc2.html#H2_43:Sample)
Now i tried:
the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Squared Test for Count Data:
x <- array(c(6, 19, 7, 10,
5, 7, 2, 0,
16, 6, 5, 1),
dim = c(2, 2, 3),
dimnames = list(
Active = c("Female", "Male"),
Placebo = c("...