Hi list, I just came across this site: http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html I was wondering are these issues being addressed or will be addressed before the 1.0 release? Theora is like the only open sourced free code people can use, i will be nice if it performs close to other libs. please keep up the good work! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/attachments/20080324/4c6afe83/attachment.htm
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:11 AM, zhongshan zhang <zhangzs at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi list, > > I just came across this site: > http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html > > I was wondering are these issues being addressed or will be addressed before > the 1.0 release?The Thusnelda encoder, which is correcting the encoder deficiencies, is an extensive set of changes and we're likely to release 1.0 without Thusnelda, then immedaitely switch mainline development to the new encoder in Thusnelda. The primary motivation is stability; although the old encoder is not high-performance, it is very rugged and relaible. The new Thusnelda encoder needs more testing to be considered trustworthy. See the update at: http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo2.html Monty
Is there a deadline/plan of when thusnelda will become the mainline encoder ? On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:16 PM, <xiphmont at xiph.org> wrote:> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:02 PM, zhongshan zhang <zhangzs at gmail.com> wrote: > > nice, does Thusnelda comply with Theora specs? will it require can change to > > the decoder? > > Thusnelda complies with Theora spec. It will work with a normal Theora decoder. > > > > Monty > _______________________________________________ > theora-dev mailing list > theora-dev at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora-dev >-- ________________________________________ Felipe Portavales Goldstein <portavales at gmail> Undergraduate Student - IC-UNICAMP Computer Systems Laboratory http://lampiao.lsc.ic.unicamp.br/~portavales/