search for: immedaitely

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "immedaitely".

2006 Apr 25
5
to ajax or not to ajax
before I started building my latest rails app, I made the decision to make good use of ajax. My reasonsing was that users would benefit from the quicker page updates - the application provides various different types of insurance quotes, and has several multi-page forms and reports that can be drilled down 5 or 6 levels deep in some cases - so it seemed like a good candidate for ajax Now
2016 Oct 27
2
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
On Oct 26, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com <mailto:clattner at apple.com>> wrote: > Responding to both of your emails in one, sorry for the delay: > >> On Oct 25, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk <mailto:peter at
2018 Nov 13
4
Re: collectd leaks SIGCHLD == SIG_IGN into plugins
...spawning external > processes it should take care to restore signal setup to a "normal" state. > This means not only setting SIG_DFL for all signals, but also just as > importantly, the signal mask. It should be set to all ones before calling > fork, and set back to all zeroes immedaitely before execve, as illustrated > in libvirt to avoid races: > > https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df;hb=HEAD#l304 > > https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb5...
2018 Nov 09
4
collectd leaks SIGCHLD == SIG_IGN into plugins
Peter Dimitrov and myself were debugging a very peculiar bug when libguestfs is run as a plugin from collectd: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/thread.html#00023 The long story short is that collectd leaks SIGCHLD == SIG_IGN setting into plugins: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/msg00095.html This means that any plugin that does the usual
2016 Oct 26
0
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Responding to both of your emails in one, sorry for the delay: > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > I think there are a couple of additional considerations we should make > here: > > - What are we trying to model? To me it's clear
2018 Nov 13
0
Re: collectd leaks SIGCHLD == SIG_IGN into plugins
...n app or library is spawning external processes it should take care to restore signal setup to a "normal" state. This means not only setting SIG_DFL for all signals, but also just as importantly, the signal mask. It should be set to all ones before calling fork, and set back to all zeroes immedaitely before execve, as illustrated in libvirt to avoid races: https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df;hb=HEAD#l304 https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df;h...
2008 Mar 24
2
Theora performance
Hi list, I just came across this site: http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html I was wondering are these issues being addressed or will be addressed before the 1.0 release? Theora is like the only open sourced free code people can use, i will be nice if it performs close to other libs. please keep up the good work! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2016 Oct 27
1
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 26, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: > >> Responding to both of your emails in one, sorry for the delay: >> >> On Oct 25, 2016, at 11:20 AM,
2016 Oct 26
7
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
Responding to both of your emails in one, sorry for the delay: > On Oct 25, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > I think there are a couple of additional considerations we should make here: > What are we trying to model? To me it's clear that GlobalConstant is for modelling integers, not pointers. That alone may not necessarily be enough to
2016 Oct 26
0
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > You get the code you want with > > > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > > > or > > > > @foo = external protected global i8 > > Sorry, not quiet. What you get is > > leaq foo(%rip), %rax > > Since it is still assuming foo is a
2016 Oct 25
4
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands
> You get the code you want with > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > or > > @foo = external protected global i8 Sorry, not quiet. What you get is leaq foo(%rip), %rax Since it is still assuming foo is a position in the file. So yes, we need a way to declare an absolute value. If we can declare it, we may as well use the same construct to define it. I guess the