search for: relaibl

I have an icecast server (B) which relays another icecast server (A). Server B is configured to play a local fallback file when server A is unavaliable. Both are version 2.3.3 When I listen to server B (the relay), while server A is turned off, all works fine ie I can listen to the fallback track without problem. However if I listen to Server B while server A is running then I quickly get: INFO

...#39;s whether the intrinsic properties of auto-vec pass fit with the criteria which one uses for enabling passes at O2. I think you were suggesting that "aggressive" transforms don't belong in O2 and auto-vec is "aggressive", while I tend to think of simplicity/performance-relaiblity as the criteria for O2 and it's unclear if auto-vec fits that. > > Cheers, > Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130605/b52ff794/attachment.html>

On 5 June 2013 13:32, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: > This is what I'd like to know about: what specific potential to change > results have you seen in the vectorizer? > No changes, just conceptual. AFAIK, the difference between the passes on O2 and O3 are minimal (looking at the code where this is chosen) and they don't seem to be particularly amazing to

Hi list, I just came across this site: http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html I was wondering are these issues being addressed or will be addressed before the 1.0 release? Theora is like the only open sourced free code people can use, i will be nice if it performs close to other libs. please keep up the good work! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Not a silly thought. I've instead of spending x hunderd thousand on brandname ibm servers and sans, how you could create a RAID array of PCs running IDE hard drives. If a PC dies just plug in some more and rebuild. If you want to add more space just add more PCs. :) that would be cool. Obviously you wouldn't use it still for critical data like databases etc, but our user

Hmmm... I've sent a couple of questions to the list recently, with no responses. Are my messages getting out? Since upgrading to 2.0.2, our Win95 boxes are having problems accessing shares. WinNT works perfectly. Win95 worked fine with 1.whatever, but now it can only see files that are actually in the share directory. It can see subdirectories of the share, but they appear as empty

...trinsic properties of > auto-vec pass fit with the criteria which one uses for enabling passes at > O2. I think you were suggesting that "aggressive" transforms don't belong in > O2 and auto-vec is "aggressive", while I tend to think of > simplicity/performance-relaiblity as the criteria for O2 and it's unclear if > auto-vec fits that. > > Cheers, > Dave > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mail...

Hello About every three months, my dad's little Asterisk server that handles his business phone line with an OpenVox PCI card stops taking calls. To check if it's the cause, I'd like to run a CRON job every night to restart Zaptel and Asterisk. Before I go ahead, I'd like to know if I can just send the following commands, or if there are issues I should know about:

Hi, I would like to start a discussion about enabling the loop vectorizer by default for -Os. The loop vectorizer can accelerate many workloads and enabling it for -Os and -O2 has obvious performance benefits. At the same time the loop vectorizer can increase the code size because of two reasons. First, to vectorize some loops we have to keep the original loop around in order to handle the last