Speex dev - Jun 2011 - Acoustic echo cancellation

On 06/22/2011 04:57 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:39 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and it's
all
>> floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will try to
>> see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I
>> assume should serve as an adequate reference.
> Surprisingly, if I use -O0 instead of -O2, I see a difference in the
> output. Nothing very observable in Audacity, but the actual output
> definitely differs.
If you use a floating point build the output is likely to change with 
the optimisation level selected, the compiler version, and maybe even 
the day of the week :-)
> Still trying to figure out why they're both so different from your run
> from 5 years ago, though.
Steve

Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread),

Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just
open-sourced?  It looks like their AEC also has code to handle differential
sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it thoroughly.

There is really a lot of code in the drop ? basically all of the GIPS DSP
stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise, echo canceller, etc), their transport layer,
hardware access (audio/video capture), etc.  It's all wrapped up to be part
of a javascript API in the browser, but it seems like the individual
components are useable without the rest.

https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/

-SteveK


From:  Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org>
Date:  Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:05:16 +0800
To:  <speex-dev at xiph.org>
Subject:  Re: [Speex-dev] Acoustic echo cancellation
> On 06/22/2011 04:57 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>  On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:39 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>  [...]
>>>  I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and
it's all
>>>  floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will
try to
>>>  see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I
>>>  assume should serve as an adequate reference.
>>  Surprisingly, if I use -O0 instead of -O2, I see a difference in the
>>  output. Nothing very observable in Audacity, but the actual output
>>  definitely differs.
> If you use a floating point build the output is likely to change with
> the optimisation level selected, the compiler version, and maybe even
> the day of the week :-)
> 
>>  Still trying to figure out why they're both so different from your
run
>>  from 5 years ago, though.
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20110621/3b603e2d/attachment.htm

On 06/22/2011 09:30 AM, Steve Kann wrote:
> Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread),
>
> Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just 
> open-sourced? It looks like their AEC also has code to handle 
> differential sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it 
> thoroughly.
>
> There is really a lot of code in the drop ? basically all of the GIPS 
> DSP stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise, echo canceller, etc), their transport 
> layer, hardware access (audio/video capture), etc. It's all wrapped up 
> to be part of a javascript API in the browser, but it seems like the 
> individual components are useable without the rest.
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/
>
> -SteveK
>
As I said last week on this very list.... yes.

Steve