search for: gip

...m included in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC codec. We've determined that the change necessary to fix Asterisk's iLBC build process is rather trivial, and so we're planning to make that change in Asterisk 1.8.7.0-rc2, and subsequently in 1.8.7.0. We are not planning on making ne...

...m included in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC codec. We've determined that the change necessary to fix Asterisk's iLBC build process is rather trivial, and so we're planning to make that change in Asterisk 1.8.7.0-rc2, and subsequently in 1.8.7.0. We are not planning on making ne...

...ust not match [0-9A-Fa-f]) and requires 2-digit entry for the octet. This is an extremely loose input format such that users may utilize it in their preferred format. After adding this, I believe I have about everything implemented except I'm uncertain about the DHCP field giaddr (pxe_bootp_t.gip). My current test environment doesn't utilize this (just 0). I'm mostly looking to see if it's something that it might be desirable to modify. DHCP fields sname and siaddr are already adjusted as needed. -- -Gene

...ysical clock for ADC and DAC seperately? What on earth causes this problem? Who knows its intrinsic real reason? Isn't there any other solutions? For example, I have also tested Microsoft MSN and Skype. It seems that AEC function of those softwares are all no problem. Their AEC are designed by GIPS. I guess that must be some solutions. The solution of GIPS is only echo suppression? Em 02-06-2010 04:41, ce09 at polyu.edu.hk escreveu: > Hi All, > > I am a research associate in the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. One of > my research interests is acoustic echo cancellation. Now I...

...responsible for cached_pkt != NULL and for + * initializing *cached_pkt (no garbge pointers, please) + */ +static void dump_cached_pkt(struct cached_pkt * cached_pkt) { + pxe_bootp_t * pkt; + struct ipaddr_str cip; + struct ipaddr_str yip; + struct ipaddr_str sip; + struct ipaddr_str gip; + + pkt = cached_pkt->buffer; + mk_ipaddr(&cip, pkt->cip), + mk_ipaddr(&yip, pkt->yip), + mk_ipaddr(&sip, pkt->sip), + mk_ipaddr(&gip, pkt->gip), + printf( + "opcode: %u Hardware: %u Hardlen: %u Gatehops: %u ident: %08x\n" +...

Hi, We are planning to use Speex as the speech codec for a VoIP application. 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking or fair comparisons? 2) In particular, how is the jitter buffer control for Speex in response to intermitent poor connection hiccups? Is it robust enough to smooth out lost packets (error con...

> Obviously this is Jean-Marc's decision and I'm not telling > him not to support this compiler. I am however pointing > out that this compiler is yet more work for very little > payoff. In the case of my project, the proponent of C++ > Builder sent me a huge, monsterously ugly and totally > unmaintainable patch to add C++ Builder support. Needless > to say, that

On 06/22/2011 09:30 AM, Steve Kann wrote: > Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread), > > Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just > open-sourced? It looks like their AEC also has code to handle > differential sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it > thoroughly. > > There is really a lot of code in the drop ? basically all of the GIPS > DSP stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise,...

...luded in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as a result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC codec. If you are a user of Asterisk and iLBC together, and you've already executed a license agreement with GIPS, we believe you can continue using iLBC with Asterisk. If you are a user of Asterisk and iLBC together, but you had not execut...

...luded in our Asterisk source code releases to download and build support for the iLBC codec had stopped working correctly; a little investigation revealed that this occurred because of some changes on the ilbcfreeware.org website. These changes occurred as a result of Google's acquisition of GIPS, who produced (and provided licenses for) the iLBC codec. If you are a user of Asterisk and iLBC together, and you've already executed a license agreement with GIPS, we believe you can continue using iLBC with Asterisk. If you are a user of Asterisk and iLBC together, but you had not execut...

On 06/22/2011 04:57 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:39 -0700, Arun Raghavan wrote: > [...] >> I'm also running this on x86 (x86_64, technically), and it's all >> floating-point, so I guess this is a regression somewhere. Will try to >> see if I can run it without any optimisations if possible, which I >> assume should serve as an adequate

...ay (LAN), while there is almost half a second of delay regardless of the codec on Asterisk. An even if we were to eliminate the latency on asterisk, Skype has at least 2x the quality of PSTN, let alone any codec on asterisk. So I ask: are there no royalty-free codecs that come close to those from GIPS? (I understand these people are supplying the codecs for Skype). Or is there something I'm doing wrong? What configuration yields the highest quality and the lowest bitrate? I'm talking LAN communication here: plenty of bandwidth, no latency. (I'm aware that this could be a flamebait...

> 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, > Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking > or fair comparisons? I think these two emails sum up my opinion about Speex vs. iLBC: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003410.html http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/...

...; > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:59 PM > To: Joe Anny > Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Speex and Builder > > > 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, > > Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking > > or fair comparisons? > > I think these two emails sum up my opinion about Speex vs. iLBC: > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003410.html > ht...

speex-dev How can I user echo canceller with real time net stream,when I test it with file,it's very good,but when I use it in my voice chat,it is not work,is there some working demo like GIPS? best regards Yong Chen szcj23@tom.com

Speaking of AEC (thought not quite on topic for this thread), Has anyone on this list played with the GIPS code that google just open-sourced? It looks like their AEC also has code to handle differential sample rates, though I haven't really evaluated it thoroughly. There is really a lot of code in the drop ? basically all of the GIPS DSP stuff (AGC, VAD, Denoise, echo canceller, etc), their tran...

Hi, My distribution is Debian 5.0 "Lenny" stable. I?ve got Wine 1.0.1 and I?ve installed Warcraft III on it. If I try to connect to Battle.Net, it says, that it can?t connect and if I search for games in lan, I can?t find anything.

...for quality/bitrate, the first thing is that Speex supports a lot > more settings (from 4 to 42 kbps) and does wideband (16 kHz sampling), There's a wideband version of iLBC, but it's not free(as in beer). Skype uses this. (Actually I'm not 100% sure it's called speex, but GIPS makes it, and it's probably closely related). > which iLBC doesn't do. I've only tested iLBC once, but I've found that > Speex has a better quality for the same bit-rate (or lower bit-rate > for > the same quality). This is mainly due to the fact that iLBC is >...

...tablished. 2. It is too slow to reach the balance. According to its experiment, it will cost about 35-40 seconds to decrease the frequence difference to 0Hz and ERLE will increase only when frequence difference is very close to 0Hz. These results are under the environment without double talk. Have GIPS and Microsoft some secret high efficient method? They AECs converge very quickly, I could hardly hear any echo in the process. How can they do it? Maoquan > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On 04/13/2011 02:58 AM, Shridhar, Vasant wrote:...

...the ROM space, and it costs > them nothing. It costs them nothing as long as they can afford to run real time floating point code, which is the only one released as open source and royalty-free. The fixed point version (a requirement for almost all ARM plaftorms, to say) has to be bought from GIPS. Ettore Benedetti THALES COMMUNICATIONS B.V. Bestevaer 46, 1271 ZA Huizen The Netherlands Unclassified