search for: underwood

Steve, Do you know if there are many differences between the Mexican and Brazilian variant ? Kind regards, Miguel Antonio Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 22:51:53 +0800 From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RES: Working E1 MFC/R2 M?xico !!! To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <4162B509.5000705@coppice.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowe...

Uys, Steve Underwood I just got a Sangoma A101 card and Im using unicall 0.0.3.pre9 for R2MFC, I get the far and local end unblocked but as soon as I try to make a call I get dialing and then protocol failure.. Do you guys know if there are any issues with sangoma and unicall? Anybody has an a101 card working with u...

Does anyone know if there is a Smartnet contract or whatnot available from Cisco for access to the latest 7920 images? I've got one w/ asterisk that is exhibiting a few of the documented bugs running 1.0.3 (1.0.7 is the latest IIRC). Thanks! -- /* Ian A. Underwood - agentgrn@dcne.net - http://www.agentgreen.org There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. */

hi, there is T.38 fax gateway for asterisk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12931 please test it and report bugs for people from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+T.38+Bounty if you still want donate t.38 development please contact me at cervajs at fpf.slu.cz --------------------------------------- Marek Cervenka =======================================

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kurt > > Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't > change. Every dam law office that I been in has at > least one fax machine that is constantly printing > something out. But to say fax is dead is an >

>>> kurtwp@yahoo.com 6/15/2004 7:29:33 AM >>> >Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't >change. Every dam law office that I been in has at >least one fax machine that is constantly printing >something out. But to say fax is dead is an >understatement. >AT&T said that about teletype service, you know 50 - >300 baud service, years ago and

Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't change. Every dam law office that I been in has at least one fax machine that is constantly printing something out. But to say fax is dead is an understatement. AT&T said that about teletype service, you know 50 - 300 baud service, years ago and then one day they noticed that traffic across their teletype seservicetarted growing. If

Hi, I have a very simple server setup, using shorewall as my firewall. I have a line like this at the top of my rules file to allow ssh connections, but limited to 3 connection per minute with a burst rate of 3: SSH/ACCEPT net $FW - - - - 3/min:3 - Now when I have that in place, and from a remote machine run scp server:/some/file ., I find

Hi all, I would like to announce the availability of an initial test version of a totally software FAX facility, suitable for use with Asterisk. This is a first public test release, so don't expect a solid polished product just yet. People have shown interest in what I am doing, and here is the evidence that it is not vapourware. If the notion of a software FAX machine is new to you,

Hi list, I'm running current SpanDSP http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully. Most Fax machines do work but I have problems with people having Tobit FaxWare and Shamrock CapiFax. http://www.tobit.com/login/mrd.asp?CategoryID=120 http://www.shamrock.de/ I've got black bars over the pages. In Tobit some content is Ok,

...end your call to a T.38 gateway and you must not use NAT anywhere in your network and you must enable re-invites which could cause CDRs not to reflect the true details of the call. Asterisk/Digium also has no interest in any further interest in expanding T.38 or faxing support in Asterisk. Steve Underwood and the other fine persons that have helped to develop the software DSPs and other stuff required for FoIP support also have no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax, TxFax + the newest span_dsp wont even compile, much less work under Asterisk any more) probably because...

If I make a call to asterisk's r2 E1 I get these errors *CLI> Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Rx bits 0x1 [1/ 1/ 0/ 0] Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Detected Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Making a new call with CRN

...nd contribute. *** ITU T.38 -- Fax over VoIP Fax over VoIP is a hot issue. VoIP service providers encourage people to switch to VoIP, but often forget to mention that faxing over VoIP is like russian roulette. On a local LAN, it might work if you pick a clear channel codec like G.711. Steve Underwood, member of the Asterisk developer team, has writen a good article about the problems involved and the solutions for it on his web site, the URL is http://soft- switch.org/foip.html T.38 is an ITU standard for fax over VoIP. To simplify, the idea is to decode the fax audio stream at the ingres...

Hi, Maybe I missed it while checking it, but which spandsp version is recommended to play with Asterisk 10 and T.38/T.30 gatewaying ? I can see both spandsp-0.0.6pre17.tgz and spandsp-0.0.6pre18.tgz here (http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/) but I couldn't find a changelog documenting differences between them. So I prefer to double check ask for recommendations. Regards

...mean that this year they would update to version 2.11.1 and would just miss 2.12.0 and would not update again until September 2011. I think we might need a more flexible strategy than this and am curious how others manage it. Thanks in advance Fiona ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dr Fiona M. Underwood Lecturer in Applied Statistics ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Has anyone found a solution for asterisk and r2 signaling ? Steve Underwood had given some information saying he had a working asterisk working. I need it to work with Argentina R2 signaling Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040915/3289f694/attachment.htm

Regardless of the xsl files. Can't we communicate with the icecast server directly to retrieve the information ?? On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:58:56 -0500, Ian A. Underwood <agentgrn@dcne.net> wrote: > lluis wrote: > > i need to access the info of the files > > > > /admin/stats.xsl > > /admin/listmounts.xsl > > /admin/listclients.xsl > > > > from a remote machine and i don't want to send every time the admin passw...

Hello Steve. On 17/05/2005, at 10:54 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: > When a fax is received the header you see is part of the image. As > such, it ends up in the TIFF file as part of the image. It is not > available as text anywhere. The only way to make it available as > text would be to implement OCR. That is complex and messy, and I...

If call recordings were stored in stereo and the callers were evenly distributed along the stereo spectrum. BAM. Just a cool idea I thought up, but probably completely impossible, and even if not, likely too much work for too little reward. Even less likely would be live stereo conference calling. But hey, RTP certainly supports stereo streams, right? I don't know if any of the used codecs

Hi, I am looking at using the softfax that Steve Underwood has developed. It's very straight forward when you assign an extension for the fax. A function that several pbx's has is that they listen for the 'faxtone' for 5 seconds after 'answer' in the menu where you can enter your local extension number, it's normally done in pa...