Thanks very much. You mean both encode and decode simulateusly (duplex)? Could you test the Java version (jspeex) on that iPaq too? (I do not have anything other than very fast PC, so I cant do this...) And, in phone, the mic can record not only the users speech but also voice from the other side (from speaker)... Does this make compression harder or the result worse? How can this impact bitrate? Can Speex eliminate this effect? Beside this, can Speex be compiled by anything other than gcc? (I do not know if gcc can create binaries for Symbian on that phone and if I remember good the SDK for Symbian on 6600 comes with some Borland C++ compiler...) thanks once more <p>Grzegorz <p><p>On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:> > When "current" code would be able to do it in Your opinion? > > I just tested the non-asm version on a 140 MHz iPaq (Intel > StrongARM-1110 rev 8) and it can do real-time encode+decode with about > 50% CPU. This means it might actually work on your CPU. > > Jean-Marc > > Compiled with gcc 3.2 (-mcpu=strongarm1100)--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> You mean both encode and decode simulateusly (duplex)?Yes.> Could you test the Java version (jspeex) on that iPaq too? (I do not have > anything other than very fast PC, so I cant do this...)Actually, I don't own an iPaq (though I'm willing to accept one :), so I long on to ipaqN.handhelds.org.> And, in phone, the mic can record not only the users speech but also voice > from the other side (from speaker)... Does this make compression harder or > the result worse? How can this impact bitrate? Can Speex eliminate this > effect?This is called echo cancellation and I don't think it's possible to do a decent job with the amount of CPU available an ARM can provide.> Beside this, can Speex be compiled by anything other than gcc? (I do not > know if gcc can create binaries for Symbian on that phone and if I > remember good the SDK for Symbian on 6600 comes with some Borland C++ > compiler...)Yes, Speex is portable code. Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr. LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius) Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée. Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040130/3d115f9e/signature-0001.pgp
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:34:52AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:> > > Beside this, can Speex be compiled by anything other than gcc? (I do not > > know if gcc can create binaries for Symbian on that phone and if I > > remember good the SDK for Symbian on 6600 comes with some Borland C++ > > compiler...) > > Yes, Speex is portable code.you can build C code for symbian 7s, no need to port to c++ or java. anyone here got libspeex running on symbian? Conrad. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.