similar to: Bridging to vlan interface?

Hi, I updated my installation to snv_105 from pkg.opensolaris.org/dev. Booting xvm kernel doesn''t work. The last working xvm version that I tested was on snv_98. I filed a bug report earlier on http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5905 Is anyone using xmv on opensolaris 2008.11 (stable or dev)? Is it suppose to work, or is it one of those

Machine is running x86 snv_94 after recent upgrade from opensolaris 2008.05. ZFS and zpool reported no troubles except suggesting upgrade for from ver.10 to ver.11. seemed like a good idea at the time. system up for several days after that point then took down for some unrelated maintenance. now will not boot the opensol, drops to grub prompt, no menus. zfs was mirrored on two disks c6d0s0 and

Hi, I''m trying to work out a solution for multiple zones with exclusive IP stacks, and existing on the same VLAN. For example, I have 3 zones on the same subnet (lets say 10.10.10.0/24), and want to put them in the same VLAN (let''s say 20). If they weren''t zones, I would plumb up e1000g20000 or equiv on each and off we go, but with zones and exclusive IP stack, I

Hi everyone, I''m Ezequiel from Buenos Aires. I''m new in this list, so please forgive me if my questions are not the correct one''s fro this alias. I''m working as a campus ambassador in Sun, while finishing my engineer degree, creating communities around opensolaris in Argentina. I discovered this project, and this group, looking for something that I could

After googling around and reading the material on the opensolaris.org xvm community site, I still do not understanding the configuration of networking and would appreciate some assistance. Problem: I have successfully installed an hvm domU running Windows XP on opensolaris 2005.11 (build 94), and when the laptop (lenovo t61, core2 9300) is connected via the e1000g0 interface networking works

I have a requirement in my current project to support multiple co-located zones on the same VLAN. Our current deployment OS is Solaris 10 Update 4. I''d like to use exclusive IP zones, but I gather the only way to currently have multiple exclusive zones with interfaces on the same VLAN is through the use of VNICs. From my initial look at S10u4, it seems VNIC support been not yet been

Hi All, I have bfu''ed to net-virt_xb-21_snv_81_021308. The dladm command on my machine does not have create-etherstub option. Please let me know what could be the issue. Thanks Khushal

How do I create a vnic that represents the factory assigned MAC address of my physical nic? The bge device in my system (x2100) appears to support 4 MAC addresses. The driver reserves the first as the ''primary/default'' address and allows manipulation of the other three via the MAC_CAPAB_MULTIADDRESS interface. I''d like to use vnics on this system, as I have Xen guest

On OpenSolaris 2009.06 I created a flow, half a dozen VNICs, and I set some properties, and everything was working, then I rebooted my system and everything disappeared from show-vnic, show-flow, and show-prop. When I tried to re-create the objects, dladm said they already existed. While I could not see the objects, I could delete them. Example: # dladm show-vnic # dladm create-vnic -l bge0

Following is a short description on assigning priorities to a link (via dladm). Flows will have a similar mechanism (via flowadm). thanks, -venu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components associated with a link or flow, such as Soft Ring Sets, Soft Rings and squeues, have kernel threads processing inbound/outbound packets. The scheduler

Hi, >From what I have read, the create-vnic feature in dladm is only available within the context of crossbow...? Specifically, what I am wondering is whether it is at all possible to successfully install crossbow on top of Sun''s "Standard/sunsolve supported" Solaris 10/08 rather than OpenSolaris, per. Se.... Is this at all feasible? Many thanks in advance.. Best

Hi the Crossbow team, I am testing my UV fastpath bits and I found several issues that need your suggestion: 1. dladm show-usage won''t work if UV fastpath is enabled. Since the link usage data are collected based on the statistics of the mac_client_impl_t, and UV fastpath skips the GLDv3 processing, that won''t be available. I don''t see a solution for this except

I have installed on a VirtualBox vm the crossbow ISO Now I''m trying to create the network map described in the "getting started" pdf I have this situation: On global zone, I have the real NIC: e1000g0 with ip 10.0.2.15 (VirtualBox NAT this IP, I can get web access with it) I have created an etherstub (etherstub n?2) with 2 vnics (vnic5 and vnic6), I''ve plumbed

redirecting to crossbow-discuss... On 03/12/09 15:17, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > In snv_108, I''m playing with creating a vnic over an etherstub, and I > might not be doing it right, but the behaviour I''m seeing doesn''t look > right either. > > So this is what I did... > > # dladm create-etherstub estub0 > # dladm create-vnic -l estub0 vnic0 > #

Hi Folks, I have a snv_105 sxce host that I just can''t get to work as expected with crossbow + zones. My test host persephone, is a virtual machine running under VMware ESXi 3.5, with 2 virtual network cards (e1000), all on the same flat network/subnet. It started life just 2 days ago with a clean install of snv_95, and I LUed to 105 yesterday. To rule out any sharing issue, the first

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Folks, I just posted an updated Crossbow virtualization architecture document. The new revision is available at: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/Docs/crossbow-virt.pdf The main changes are the addition of support for multiple MAC addresses per client, and an explicit separation between consolidation private and project private MAC API entry points. See in particular the

Ok, I''m hoping this is a fairly trivial issue, and I''m missing something. I''m trying to use Solaris zones (Nevada Build 117) to act as a DMZ and a router, using exclusive IPs, VNICs (from Crossbow), and connecting to the internet (static IP from my ISP). I''ve got the DMZ working - that zone sees the internet, can do name lookups, ftp, telnet, ssh, etc etc etc.

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Bitstream Vera Sans"><br>     Hello,<br> <br>     I am trying to have dns <b>automatically</b> configured through