On 01/21/09 10:11, Darren Reed wrote:> So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have...
>
> e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10
> vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22
> I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic.
> I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works.
> I stop the snoop on e1000g2.
> I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work.
> I start the snoop on e1000g2.
> I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works.
>
>
<sarcasm>> Is this a new feature with crossbow?
>
</sarcasm>> Or should I open a P1 for this?
>
>
there doesn''t seem to be any crossbow bugs which
describe this behaviour so feel free...
> And what category/subcat should I file the test suite bug?
> - there should be some sort of test that makes sure this
> kind of bug is never introduced.
>
>
product: stc
cat: net
sub: gldv3
this where all the vnic tests live.
-mike> The commands are/were:
> # ifconfig e1000g2 plumb
> # ifconfig e1000g2 192.168.85.10 up
> # dladm create-vnic -l e1000g2 vnic0
> # ifconfig vnic0 plumb
> # ifconfig vnic0 192.168.85.22 up
> # snoop -d e1000g2
>
> Darren
>
> _______________________________________________
> crossbow-discuss mailing list
> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-discuss
>