similar to: Powering off the big stuff first

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Powering off the big stuff first"

2023 Jul 16
1
Powering off the big stuff first
Interesting. Something similar came up in late May. Look for "[Nut-upsuser] Synthesize low batt (LB) fron SNMP UPS which does not support this?? Is there an archive of this list? I an?t find it. I?d been trying to figure out how to do that itself, but then found some code in drivers/dstate.c that looked like it would work, but someone else replied that they?d tried it and it didn?t work. But
2023 Jul 16
1
Powering off the big stuff first
One thing that I think NUT misses is the client side being able to decide to shutdown by itself based on time (this can be done), battery charge (ex if bellow 10%), and estimated runtime left (if available and considered reliable/calibrated). Without having to sort on the LB state from the server. Sent from my iPhone with ? iTypos > On Jul 16, 2023, at 4:34 PM, Willcox David via Nut-upsuser
2023 Oct 27
2
FSD sequence: Waiting for bigger and slower clients before cutting power
Hi, and thanks for this great piece of free software! I've been meaning to sort this out for some time, but we don't get power outages that often, fortunately... So, correct me if I'm wrong, but from the documentation at https:// networkupstools.org/docs/user-manual.chunked/ Configuration_notes.html#UPS_shutdown, and also reading upsmon.c, when a UPS goes OB LB (assuming we have a
2020 Sep 11
1
UPS recommendation for NUT and power-on-delay support
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Bartosz wrote: > Dear All, > > Could you please recommend me a UPS with 100% support of the ondelay parameter and NUT compatibility? > > 850 or 1000 VA > > I have the EATON 5E850iUSBDIN UPS and it does not support this parameter so I would like to buy another UPS that for sure will support it. > > Thank you, > Bart Can you tell
2020 Sep 04
2
Monitoring slaves via dummy-ups
Hello, I wondered how folks monitored slaves. In my case, I am using Nagios and the check_ups plugin. It seems to work fine but being new to nut, I'm seeking confirmation that this is a sane approach. The goal: confirm the slaves have contact with the master. The environment: * FreeBSD 12.1 * nut-2.7.4 installed from package Background: I am replacing an APC 2200 UPS (still in use) with
2023 Mar 09
1
Question on EATON UPS
Laurent Taieb via Nut-upsuser wrote on 3/9/23 9:25 AM: > > Hi NUT Users, > > One of my APC UPS is having battery issue and apparently we cannot > change battery in that UPS. (not super green?) > > I have purchased an EATON UPS and added the ref in ups.conf > > When restarting the driver, I got this error > > >0.030612[D2] Checking device 2 of 10 (0463/FFFF)
2014 Dec 31
2
Postfix and Dovecot SASL - wiki update
I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki entry yesterday. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL The entry: submission inet n - - - - smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will
2020 Sep 04
1
Monitoring slaves via dummy-ups
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Dan Langille wrote: > > > I wondered how folks monitored slaves. > > A NUT solution is to use a "heartbeat" generated in each slave and monitored in > say the master or elsewhere. I did find this earlier today: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2017-April/010590.html Is
2013 Oct 22
2
doveadm: Fatal: open(/dev/tty)
I received this message today, and remembered, you can't do that... $ doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT Enter new password: doveadm(dan): Fatal: open(/dev/tty) failed: No such file or directory </pre> It seems if you have no tty, you can't create a password. Surely there is a better way to do this? Looking at the code, it's trying to open the tty and turn off echo. For the
2003 May 18
3
ad0: READ command timeout....
This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
2023 Mar 09
1
Question on EATON UPS
On Thursday, March 9th, 2023 at 8:34 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: >> The UPS has been defined in ups.conf as: >> >> [myups3] >> >> driver : usbhid-ups >> >> port = auto >> >> vendorid = 0463 >> >> productid = ffff >> >> desc = "5S" >> >> bus
2010 Jul 25
4
zpool destroy causes panic
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains nothing of value. # zpool status pool: storage state: ONLINE status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.
2020 Sep 12
1
UPS recommendation for NUT and power-on-delay support
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, Bartosz wrote: > Could you please recommend me a UPS with 100% support of the ondelay parameter > and NUT compatibility? 850 or 1000 VA I have the EATON 5E850iUSBDIN UPS and it > does not support this parameter so I would like to buy another UPS that for > sure will support it. I have an Eaton Ellipse Eco 1600 bought in 2016 which has a delayed start feature.
2008 Feb 23
1
packet loss with re(4)
With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems:
2004 Apr 22
2
IPsec - got ESP going, but not AH
Hi folks, I've been working on getting my WiFi network running with IPsec. I'm at the point where all traffic on the wifi subnet is encrypted (i.e. ESP). Then I tried to add AH to the equation. I failed. This picture describes the network setup: http://beta.freebsddiary.org/images/ipsec-wireless.gif Here's what I'm trying and failing with. With these rules, I get no
2004 Jul 09
3
bash as a login shell (was Root users shell == no existant shell /bin/bash)
On 9 Jul 2004 at 13:11, Daniel Brown wrote: > On the other hand, I've run across a sysadmin who always enables his > toor accounts -- and changes its shell to bash. As a result, not only > is there an alternate root account (good in case 'root' trampled on by > accident or purpose), but you can get root bash as a login shell while > leaving the real root to its normal
2006 Aug 08
4
choosing a UPS (in the United States)
I do a bunch of "kindness of strangers" hosting in my basement and my three kVA apc unit died recently. In looking around, it looked like Belkin was a reasonable low-end replacement for a few machines. Then I read this mailing list after I purchased one and was gifted another. It looks like people don't like Belkin. ;-) So the question is what's a good UPS for running
2023 Mar 09
1
Question on EATON UPS
Thanks Larry, I tried. Got the following traces and the driver doesn?t start. 1.036797 [D2] - VendorID: 0463 1.036812 [D2] - ProductID: ffff 1.036826 [D2] - Manufacturer: unknown 1.036840 [D2] - Product: unknown 1.036872 [D2] - Serial Number: unknown 1.036912 [D2] - Bus: 002 1.036942 [D2] - Device: unknown 1.036965 [D2] - Device
2013 Sep 13
3
SSL with startssl.com certificates
I'm using Dovecot 2.2.5. I'm setting up and new IMAPS server for personal use (i.e. only me). I have success with self-signed certificates but not with others (e.g. StartSSL.com) With StartSSL certs: I've been able to connect and test commands via: openssl s_client -connect imaps.unixathome.org:993 Can you configure your iPhone or Macbook to access the above? Authentication
2013 Oct 18
1
Which MTA for a personal-use dovecot instance?
I'm planning to deploy a personal dovecot IMAP server (i.e. I am the only user) in a FreeBSD jail. At present, I have IMAP deployed on the same host as one of my mail servers, which is running Postfix. I do like Postfix, but it seems to be a bit overkill for this particular situation. All my incoming MX are provided by Google. They handle the incoming mail and forward to my private MX,